Cross-sectoral communication by bringing together patient with cancer, general practitioner and oncologist in a video-based consultation: a qualitative study of oncologists' and nurse specialists' perspectives

Dorte Gilså Hansen, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Jeffrey James Sisler, Jens Søndergaard, Lars Henrik Jensen, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Jeffrey James Sisler, Jens Søndergaard, Lars Henrik Jensen

Abstract

Shared care models in the field of cancer aim to improve care coordination, role clarification and patient satisfaction. Cross-sectoral communication is pivotal. Involvement of patients may add to intended mechanisms.A randomised controlled trial 'The Partnership Study' tested the effect of bringing together patient, general practitioner (GP) and oncologist for a consultation conducted by video.

Purpose: As part of the process evaluation, this study aimed to explore experiences, attitudes and perspectives of the oncological department on sharing patient consultations with GPs using video.

Methods: Four semistructured interviews with five oncologists and four nurse specialists were conducted in February 2020. We focused on the informants' experiences and reflections on the potential of future implementation of the concept 'inviting the GP for a shared consultation by video'. The analyses were based on an inductive, open-minded, hermeneutic phenomenological approach.

Results: A total of six overall themes were identified: structuring consultation and communication, perceptions of GP involvement in cancer care, stressors, making a difference, alternative ways of cross-sector communication and needs for redesigning the model. The concept made sense and was deemed useful, but solving the many technical and organisational problems is pivotal. Case-specific tasks and relational issues were targeted by pragmatically rethinking protocol expectations and the usual way of communication and structuring patient encounters. Case selection was discussed as one way of maturing the concept.

Conclusion: This Danish study adds new insight into understanding different aspects of the process, causal mechanisms as well as the potential of future implementation of video-based tripartite encounters. Beyond solving the technical problems, case selection and organisational issues are important. Acknowledging the disruption of the usual workflow, the introduction of new phases of the usual encounter and the variety of patient-GP relationships to be embraced may help to better understand and comply with barriers and facilitators of communication and sharing.

Trial registration number: NCT02716168.

Keywords: adult oncology; primary care; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Haggerty JL, Roberge D, Freeman GK, et al. . Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple clinicians: a qualitative metasummary. The Annals of Family Medicine 2013;11:262–71. 10.1370/afm.1499
    1. Grunfeld E. The two solitudes of primary care and cancer specialist care: is there a bridge? Curr Oncol 2017;24:69–70. 10.3747/co.24.3488
    1. Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al. . The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1231–72. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3
    1. Lawrence RA, McLoone JK, Wakefield CE, et al. . Primary care physicians' perspectives of their role in cancer care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:1222–36. 10.1007/s11606-016-3746-7
    1. Dossett LA, Hudson JN, Morris AM, et al. . The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:156–69. 10.3322/caac.21385
    1. Tomasone JR, Vukmirovic M, Brouwers MC, et al. . Challenges and insights in implementing coordinated care between oncology and primary care providers: a Canadian perspective. Curr Oncol 2017;24:120–3. 10.3747/co.24.3426
    1. Zhao Y, Brettle A, Qiu L. The effectiveness of shared care in cancer Survivors-A systematic review. Int J Integr Care 2018;18:2. 10.5334/ijic.3954
    1. Perfors IAA, May AM, Boeijen JA, et al. . Involving the general practitioner during curative cancer treatment: a systematic review of health care interventions. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026383. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026383
    1. Voruganti T, Grunfeld E, Makuwaza T, et al. . Web-Based tools for Text-Based patient-provider communication in chronic conditions: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e366. 10.2196/jmir.7987
    1. Bergholdt SH, Larsen PV, Kragstrup J, et al. . Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000764. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000764
    1. Brennan ME, Gormally JF, Butow P, et al. . Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Br J Cancer 2014;111:1899–908. 10.1038/bjc.2014.505
    1. Tomasone JR, Brouwers MC, Vukmirovic M, et al. . Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review. ESMO Open 2016;1:e000077. 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000077
    1. Lawn S, Fallon-Ferguson J, Koczwara B. Shared care involving cancer specialists and primary care providers - What do cancer survivors want? Health Expect 2017;20:1081–7. 10.1111/hex.12551
    1. Hong YA, Hossain MM, Chou W-YS. Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: a systematic review. Psychooncology 2020;29:591–603. 10.1002/pon.5310
    1. Steffensen KD, Vinter M, Crüger D, et al. . Lessons in integrating shared decision-making into cancer care. J Oncol Pract 2018;14:229–35. 10.1200/JOP.18.00019
    1. Trabjerg TB, Jensen LH, Søndergaard J, et al. . Improving continuity by bringing the cancer patient, general practitioner and oncologist together in a shared video-based consultation - protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2019;20:86. 10.1186/s12875-019-0978-8
    1. Jess M, Timm H, Dieperink KB. Video consultations in palliative care: a systematic integrative review. Palliat Med 2019;33:942–58. 10.1177/0269216319854938
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. . Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. 10.1136/bmj.h1258
    1. Malterud K. Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: why and how? Scand J Public Health 2016;44:120–9. 10.1177/1403494815621181
    1. Cyr J. The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociol Methods Res 2016;45:231–59. 10.1177/0049124115570065
    1. Vicsek L. Issues in the analysis of focus groups: Generalisability, Quantifiability, treatment of context and quotations. Qualitative Report 2010;15:122–41. 10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1143
    1. Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract 2018;24:9–18. 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
    1. Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ 2019;8:90–7. 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
    1. O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. . Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89:1245–51. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
    1. Ammentorp J, Graugaard LT, Lau ME, et al. . Mandatory communication training of all employees with patient contact. Patient Educ Couns 2014;95:429–32. 10.1016/j.pec.2014.03.005
    1. Trabjerg TB, Jensen LH, Sondergaard J, et al. . Investigating whether shared video-based consultations with patients, oncologists, and GPs can benefit patient-centred cancer care: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2020;4. 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101023. [Epub ahead of print: 23 Jun 2020].
    1. Prip A, Møller KA, Nielsen DL, et al. . The Patient-Healthcare professional relationship and communication in the oncology outpatient setting: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 2018;41:E11–22. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000533
    1. Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, et al. . Real-World implementation of video outpatient consultations at macro, meso, and micro levels: Mixed-Method study. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e150. 10.2196/jmir.9897
    1. Donaghy E, Atherton H, Hammersley V, et al. . Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:e586–94. 10.3399/bjgp19X704141
    1. Mikkelsen T, Sondergaard J, Sokolowski I, et al. . Cancer survivors' rehabilitation needs in a primary health care context. Fam Pract 2009;26:221–30. 10.1093/fampra/cmp004
    1. Larsen MB, Hansen RP, Olesen F, et al. . Patients' confidence in their GP before and after being diagnosed with cancer. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e215–22. 10.3399/bjgp11X572409
    1. Mitchell GK, Burridge LH, Colquist SP, et al. . General practitioners' perceptions of their role in cancer care and factors which influence this role. Health Soc Care Community 2012;20:607–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01075.x
    1. Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Søndergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25 Suppl 1:S34–8. 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110216
    1. Wright M, Mainous A. Can continuity of care in primary care be sustained in the modern health system? Aust J Gen Pract 2018;47:667–9. 10.31128/AJGP-06-18-4618
    1. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S. Video consultations for covid-19. An opportunity in a crisis. BMJ 2020;368:m998.
    1. Funderskov KF, Raunkiær M, Danbjørg DB, et al. . Experiences with video consultations in specialized palliative home-care: qualitative study of patient and relative perspectives. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e10208. 10.2196/10208
    1. Thornton J. Covid-19: how coronavirus will change the face of general practice forever. BMJ 2020;368:m1279. 10.1136/bmj.m1279
    1. Guassora AD, Jarlbaek L, Thorsen T. Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:202. 10.1186/s12913-015-0856-6
    1. Easley J, Miedema B, O’Brien MA, et al. . The role of family physicians in cancer care: perspectives of primary and specialty care providers. Current Oncology 2017;24:75–80. 10.3747/co.24.3447
    1. Easley J, Miedema B, Carroll JC, et al. . Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: importance of communication. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:e608–15.
    1. Trabjerg TB, Jensen LH, Søndergaard J, et al. . Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners. Support Care Cancer 2021;29:107–16. 10.1007/s00520-020-05467-0
    1. Nekhlyudov L, Mollica MA, Jacobsen PB, et al. . Developing a quality of cancer survivorship care framework: implications for clinical care, research, and policy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019;111:1120–30. 10.1093/jnci/djz089

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir