The biomechanical demands of standing yoga poses in seniors: The Yoga empowers seniors study (YESS)

Man-Ying Wang, Sean S-Y Yu, Rami Hashish, Sachithra D Samarawickrame, Leslie Kazadi, Gail A Greendale, George Salem, Man-Ying Wang, Sean S-Y Yu, Rami Hashish, Sachithra D Samarawickrame, Leslie Kazadi, Gail A Greendale, George Salem

Abstract

Background: The number of older adults participating in yoga has increased dramatically in recent years; yet, the physical demands associated with yoga performance have not been reported. The primary aim of the Yoga Empowers Seniors Study (YESS) was to use biomechanical methods to quantify the physical demands associated with the performance of 7 commonly-practiced standing yoga poses in older adults.

Methods: 20 ambulatory older adults (70.7+-3.8 yrs) attended 2 weekly 60-minute Hatha yoga classes for 32 weeks. The lower-extremity net joint moments of force (JMOFs), were obtained during the performance of the following poses: Chair, Wall Plank, Tree, Warrior II, Side Stretch, Crescent, and One-Legged Balance. Repeated-measure ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used to identify differences in JMOFs among the poses. Electromyographic analysis was used to support the JMOF findings.

Results: There was a significant main effect for pose, at the ankle, knee and hip, in the frontal and sagittal planes (p=0.00-0.03). The Crescent, Chair, Warrior II, and One-legged Balance poses generated the greatest average support moments. Side Stretch generated the greatest average hip extensor and knee flexor JMOFs. Crescent placed the highest demands on the hip flexors and knee extensors. All of the poses produced ankle plantar-flexor JMOFs. In the frontal plane, the Tree generated the greatest average hip and knee abductor JMOFs; whereas Warrior II generated the greatest average hip and knee adductor JMOFs. Warrior II and One-legged Balance induced the largest average ankle evertor and invertor JMOFs, respectively. The electromyographic findings were consistent with the JMOF results.

Conclusions: Musculoskeletal demand varied significantly across the different poses. These findings may be used to guide the design of evidence-based yoga interventions that address individual-specific training and rehabilitation goals in seniors.

Clinical trial registration: This study is registered with NIH Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT 01411059.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01411059.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An instrumented participant performing the Warrior II pose while guided by the yoga instructor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EMG signal of the Vastus Lateralis during performance of the Crescent pose. Data analysis was conducted on the middle 3 seconds (between solid lines), during the static portion of the pose (between dashed lines).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average Support moments. The dashed line indicates the average peak support moment generated during walking at a self-selected speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. There was no statistically significant difference among the 4 poses generating the greatest average support moments (p = 0.07 – 1.00).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average Hip JMOFs in the sagittal plane. The dashed lines indicate the average peak JMOF generated during walking at a self-selective speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average flexor JMOFs: Crescent Trailing > Warrior II Trailing, Wall Plank & Tree (p < 0.001, d = 1.7 – 2.4); Warrior II Trailing > Tree (p = 0.043, d = 1.0). Average extensor JMOFs: Side Stretch Leading > Chair (p = 0.018, d = 1.2), Warrior II Leading (p = 0.002, d = 1.2) & One-legged Balance (p < 0.001, d = 1.5).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average Hip JMOFs in the frontal plane. The dashed lines indicate the average peak JMOF generated during walking at a self-selective speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average abductor JMOFs: Tree > One-legged Balance, Wall Plank & Chair (p < 0.001, d = 1.6 – 5.3); One-legged Balance > Wall Plank & Chair (p < 0.001, d = 3.0 – 4.9); Wall Plank > Chair (p < 0.001, d = 1.4). Average adductor JMOFs: Warrior II Leading > Crescent Leading & Side Stretch Leading (p < 0.001, d = 2.4 – 2.6); Warrior II Trailing > Crescent Leading & Side Stretch Leading (p < 0.001, d = 2.1 – 2.2).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average Knee JMOFs in the sagittal plane. The dashed lines indicate the average peak JMOFs generated during walking at a self-selective speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average flexor JMOFs: Side Stretch Leading > One-legged Balance (p = 0.048, d = 0.6) & Side Stretch Trailing (p = 0.023, d = 1.0). Average extensor JMOFs: Crescent Trailing > Crescent Leading (p = 0.006, d = 0.9) & Warrior II Leading (p < 0.001, d = 1.2); Chair > Crescent Leading (p = 0.035, d = 0.8)& Warrior II Leading (p < 0.001, d = 1.1).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Average Knee JMOFs in the frontal plane. The dashed lines indicate the average peak JMOFs generated during walking at a self-selective speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average abductor JMOFs: Tree > One-legged Balance, Wall Plank & Chair (p < 0.001, d = 1.2 – 3.3); One-legged Balance > Wall Plank & Chair (p < 0.001, d = 1.4 – 1.7). Average adductor JMOFs: Warrior II Trailing > Crescent Leading, Side Stretch Trailing, and Crescent Trailing (p < 0.001, d = 1.7 – 2.1).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Average Ankle JMOFs in the sagittal plane. The dashed line indicates the average peak ankle JMOFs generated during walking at a self-selected speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average plantar-flexor JMOFs: One-legged Balance > Wall Plank (p = 0.015, d = 0.9), Tree (p = 0.004, d = 0.9), & Side Stretch Trailing (p < 0.001, d = 1.9); Wall Plank > Side Stretch Trailing (p < 0.001, d = 1.6); Tree > Side Stretch Trailing (p = 0.002, d = 1.1).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Average Ankle JMOFs in the frontal plane. The dashed line indicates the average peak ankle JMOFs generated during walking at a self-selected speed. The whiskers represent standard errors. Average abductor JMOFs: Warrior II Trailing > Crescent Trailing (p = 0.032, d = 0.4). Average adductor JMOFs: One-legged Balance > Tree (p = 0.039, d = 0.4), Crescent Leading (p < 0.001, d = 1.6) & Side Stretch Leading (p < 0.001, d = 1.9); Tree > Crescent Leading & Side Stretch Leading (p < 0.001, d = 1.0 – 1.3).

References

    1. Association NSG. Sports participation in 2010: lifecycle demographics. National Sporting Goods Association; 2011.
    1. Tummers N, Hendrick F. Older adults say yes to yoga. Nat Recreat Park Assoc. 2004;39:54–60.
    1. Wang MY, Yu SY, Hashish R, Samarawickrame S, Haines M, Mulwitz L, Kazadi L, Greendale GA, Salem GJ. Biomechanical demands of therapeutic Hatha yoga poses in older adults: modified chair and downward facing dog. Long Beach, CA; 2011. (Proceedings of the Annual meeting of American society of biomechanics). .
    1. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:113–119. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090114.
    1. Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, Sato M, Baba H, Shimada S. Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:617–622. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.7.617.
    1. Greendale GA, Kazadi L, Mazdyasni S, Ramirez E, Wang MY, Yu SY, Salem GJ. The Yoga empowers seniors study (YESS): design and asana series. J Yoga Phys Ther. 2012;2:1–8.
    1. Greendale GA, Huang MH, Karlamangla AS, Seeger L, Crawford S. Yoga decreases kyphosis in senior women and men with adult-onset hyperkyphosis: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1569–1579. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02391.x.
    1. Iyengar BKS. Light on yoga. London: Thorsons; 2001.
    1. Manal K, McClay I, Stanhope S, Richards J, Galinat B. Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. Gait Posture. 2000;11:38–45. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00042-9.
    1. McClay I, Manal K. Three-dimensional kinetic analysis of running: significance of secondary planes of motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:1629–1637. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199911000-00021.
    1. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H. et al.ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech. 2002;35:543–548. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6.
    1. Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang XG. et al.ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38:981–992. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042.
    1. Winter DA. Overall principle of lower-limb support during stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 1980;13:923–927. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90162-1.
    1. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009.
    1. Salem GJ, Wang MY, Azen SP, Young JT, Greendale GA. Lower-extremity kinetic response to activity program dosing in older adults. J Appl Biomech. 2001;17:103–112.
    1. Flanagan S, Salem GJ, Wang MY, Sanker SE, Greendale GA. Squatting exercises in older adults: kinematic and kinetic comparisons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:635–643. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000058364.47973.06.
    1. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 1997;13:135–163.
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–159.
    1. Wolfson L, Whipple R, Derby C, Judge J, King M, Amerman P, Schmidt J, Smyers D. Balance and strength training in older adults: Intervention gains and Tai Chi maintenance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:498–506.
    1. Suzuki T, Kim H, Yoshida H, Ishizaki T. Randomized controlled trial of exercise intervention for the prevention of falls in community-dwelling elderly Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab. 2004;22:602–611. doi: 10.1007/s00774-004-0530-2.
    1. Hernandez ME, Goldberg A, Alexander NB. Decreased muscle strength relates to self-reported stooping, crouching, or kneeling difficulty in older adults. Phys Ther. 2010;90:67–74. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090035.
    1. Takazawa K, Arisawa K, Honda S, Shibata Y, Saito H. Lower-extremity muscle forces measured by a hand-held dynamometer and the risk of falls among day-care users in Japan: using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:399–404. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000090416.
    1. Chang A, Hayes K, Dunlop D, Song J, Hurwitz D, Cahue S, Sharma L. Hip abduction moment and protection against medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3515–3519. doi: 10.1002/art.21406.
    1. Iverson BD, Gossman MR, Shaddeau SA, Turner ME Jr. Balance performance, force production, and activity levels in noninstitutionalized men 60 to 90 years of age. Phys Ther. 1990;70:348–355.
    1. Mackinnon CD, Winter DA. Control of whole-body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. J Biomech. 1993;26:633–644. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90027-C.
    1. Winters KM, Snow CM. Body composition predicts bone mineral density and balance in premenopausal women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:865–872. doi: 10.1089/152460900750020892.
    1. Hurwitz DE, Sumner DR, Andriacchi TP, Sugar DA. Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. J Biomech. 1998;31:423–430. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00028-1.
    1. Amin S, Luepongsak N, McGibbon CA, LaValley MP, Krebs DE, Felson DT. Knee adduction moment and development of chronic knee pain in elders. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:371–376. doi: 10.1002/art.20396.
    1. Vanwanseele B, Eckstein F, Smith RM, Lange AK, Foroughi N, Baker MK, Shnier R, Singh MAF. The relationship between knee adduction moment and cartilage and meniscus morphology in women with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2010;18:894–901. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.006.
    1. Daubney ME, Culham EG. Lower-extremity muscle force and balance performance in adults aged 65 years and older. Phys Ther. 1999;79:1177–1185.
    1. Salem GJ, Flanagan SP, Wang MY, Song JE, Azen SP, Greendale GA. Lower-extremity kinetic response to weighted-vest resistance during stepping exercise in older adults. J Appl Biomech. 2004;20:260–274.
    1. Flanagan SP, Wang MY, Greendale GA, Azen SP, Salem GJ. Biomechanical attributes of lunging activities for older adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:599–605.
    1. Wang MY, Flanagan S, Song JE, Greendale GA, Salem GJ. Lower-extremity biomechanics during forward and lateral stepping activities in older adults. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:214–221. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00204-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir