Deferring Elective Urologic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Patients' Perspective

Riccardo Campi, Riccardo Tellini, Antonio Andrea Grosso, Daniele Amparore, Andrea Mari, Lorenzo Viola, Andrea Cocci, Paolo Polverino, Enrico Checcucci, Paolo Alessio, Cristian Fiori, Andrea Minervini, Marco Carini, Francesco Porpiglia, Sergio Serni, Riccardo Campi, Riccardo Tellini, Antonio Andrea Grosso, Daniele Amparore, Andrea Mari, Lorenzo Viola, Andrea Cocci, Paolo Polverino, Enrico Checcucci, Paolo Alessio, Cristian Fiori, Andrea Minervini, Marco Carini, Francesco Porpiglia, Sergio Serni

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the perspective of urological patients on the possibility to defer elective surgery due to the fear of contracting COVID-19.

Methods: All patients scheduled for elective urological procedures for malignant or benign diseases at 2 high-volume centers were administered a questionnaire, through structured telephone interviews, between April 24 and 27, 2020. The questionnaire included 3 questions: (1) In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, would you defer the planned surgical intervention? (2) If yes, when would you be willing to undergo surgery? (3) What do you consider potentially more harmful for your health: the risk of contracting COVID-19 during hospitalization or the potential consequences of delaying surgical treatment?

Results: Overall, 332 patients were included (51.5% and 48.5% in the oncology and benign groups, respectively). Of these, 47.9% patients would have deferred the planned intervention (33.3% vs 63.4%; P < .001), while the proportion of patients who would have preferred to delay surgery for more than 6 months was comparable between the groups (87% vs 80%). These answers were influenced by patient age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (in the Oncology group) and by the underlying urological condition (in the benign group). Finally, 182 (54.8%) patients considered the risk of COVID-19 potentially more harmful than the risk of delaying surgery (37% vs 73%; P < .001). This answer was driven by patient age and the underlying disease in both groups.

Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the importance of shared decision-making before urological surgery, leveraging patients' values and expectations to refine the paradigm of evidence-based medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients’ perspectives on refusal of elective urological surgery and their drivers, stratified by the nature of underlying urological condition (malignant disease [group A] vs benign disease [group B]). The factors influencing the answers to questions Q1-Q3 are shown in the lower portion of the figure and are highlighted in light grey (for patient-related variables) and dark grey (for disease-related variables). ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists. (Color version available online.)

References

    1. Ficarra V, Novara G, Abrate A. Urology practice during COVID-19 pandemic. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03846-1. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Teoh JYC, Lay Keat Ong W, Gonzalez-Padilla D. A Global survey on the impact of COVID-19 on urological services. Eur Urol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.025. In Press.
    1. Luciani LG, Mattevi D, Giusti G. Guess who's coming to dinner: COVID-19 in a COVID-free unit. Urology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.011. [published online ahead of print]
    1. Puliatti S, Eissa A, Eissa R. COVID-19 and urology: a comprehensive review of the literature. BJU Int. 2020;125:E7–E14.
    1. Amparore D, Claps F, Cacciamani GE. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency training in Italy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;10:23736. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D. Slowdown of urology residents' learning curve during the COVID-19 emergency. BJU Int. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bju.15076. [published online ahead of print]
    1. Vargo E, Ali M, Henry F. Cleveland Clinic Akron General Urology Residency Program's COVID-19 Experience [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 2] Urology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.001.
    1. Kwon YS, Tabakin AL, Patel HV. Adapting urology residency training in the COVID-19 era. Urology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.065. [published online ahead of print]
    1. Porreca A, Colicchia M, D'Agostino D. Urology in the time of coronavirus: reduced access to urgent and emergent urological care during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Italy. Urol Int. 2020:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000508512.
    1. Amparore D, Campi R, Checcucci E. Forecasting the future of Urology practice: a comprehensive review of the recommendations by International and European Associations on priority procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 S2405-4569(20)30142-5.
    1. Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A. Considerations in the triage of urologic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Urol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.027. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Ribal MJ, Cornford P, Briganti A. EAU Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: an organisation-wide collaborative effort to adapt the EAU guidelines recommendations to the COVID-19 era. Eur Urol. 2020 In Press. Available at:
    1. Goldman HB, Haber GP. Recommendations for tiered stratification of urologic surgery urgency in the COVID-19 era. J Urol. 2020 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Ficarra V, Mucciardi G, Giannarini G. Re: Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Umberto Capitanio, et al. Assessing the burden of urgent major uro-oncologic surgery to guide prioritisation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from three Italian high-volume referral centres. Eur Urol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.054. In press.
    1. Bryan AF, Milner R, Roggin KK. Unknown unknowns: surgical consent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Surgery. 2020 In Press.
    1. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5146.
    1. Morlacco A, Motterle G, Zattoni F. The multifaceted long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology. Nat Rev Urol. 2020:1–3.
    1. Campi R, Amparore D, Capitanio U. Assessing the burden of nondeferrable major uro-oncologic surgery to guide prioritisation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from three Italian high-volume referral centres. Eur Urol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.054. Epub ahead of print.
    1. Campi R, Amparore D, Capitanio U. Reply to Vincenzo Ficarra, Giuseppe Mucciardi, and Gianluca Giannarini's Letter to the Editor re: Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Umberto Capitanio, et al. Assessing the burden of nondeferrable major uro-oncologic surgery to guide prioritisation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from three Italian high-volume referral centres. Eur Urol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.054.
    1. Borchert A, Baumgarten L, Dalela D. Managing urology consultations during COVID-19 pandemic: application of a structured care pathway. Urology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.059. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 21]
    1. Tan YQ, Wang Z, Tiong HY. The START (Surgical Triage And Resource Allocation Tool) of surgical prioritisation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.021. [published online ahead of print]
    1. Amparore D, Campi R, Checcucci E. Patients’ perspective on the use of telemedicine for outpatient urological visits: learning from the COVID-19 outbreak. Actas Urol Esp. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.06.008. In press.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir