A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Escalating Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Subcutaneous Eflapegrastim in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Subjects

Yoomin Jeon, Nora Lee, Seungjae Baek, JaeDuk Choi, Stanford Jhee, Howard Lee, Yoomin Jeon, Nora Lee, Seungjae Baek, JaeDuk Choi, Stanford Jhee, Howard Lee

Abstract

Background: Eflapegrastim (Rolontis®) is a novel long-acting pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Eflapegrastim has been developed to reduce the duration and incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in cancer patients using patient-friendly, less-frequent administration.

Objective: This phase I study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and immunogenicity of eflapegrastim following a single subcutaneous administration to healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, dose-escalation study was conducted in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Eligible subjects randomly received a single subcutaneous administration of eflapegrastim (1.1, 3.3, 10, 45, 135, and 270 μg/kg), pegfilgrastim 6 mg, or placebo in a ratio of 6:2:2 (Cohorts 1-2, Caucasian subjects only) or 12:2:2 (Cohorts 3-6, Japanese and Caucasian subjects). Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Serial blood samples were collected predose and up to day 22 postdose for PK and PD analyses. PK assessments were performed in the 45, 135, and 270 µg/kg dose groups. Antidrug antibodies to eflapegrastim were determined at baseline up to day 42 after the first dose for immunogenicity.

Results: A total of 84 subjects (42 males and 42 females) were enrolled, and 78 (31 Japanese and 47 Caucasian subjects) completed the study as planned. Japanese and Caucasian subjects showed similar PK and PD profiles. In the 45, 135, and 270 µg/kg dose groups, the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of eflapegrastim exhibited a dose-proportional increase, whereas its exposure increased greater than dose proportional in both ethnic groups. The mean area under the effect-time curve (AUEClast) and maximum serum concentration of both absolute neutrophil count (ANCmax) and CD34+ cell count (CD34+max) increased in a dose-dependent manner. There were no significant adverse events attributable to eflapegrastim or pegfilgrastim in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects. No neutralizing antibodies against G-CSF were detected.

Conclusions: Eflapegrastim was safe and well tolerated at doses up to 270 μg/kg in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. In both ethnic groups, eflapegrastim showed dose-dependent PK and the exposure to eflapegrastim was positively correlated with ANC and CD34+ cell count. The comparable PK and PD profiles of eflapegrastim in Japanese and Caucasian subjects may indicate the same dosage regimen is acceptable.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01037543 (23 December 2009).

Conflict of interest statement

NL, SB, and JDC are employees of Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. YJ and HL have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the contents of this article. SJ received funding from Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to conduct this study.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Subject disposition. A total of 36 Japanese and 48 Caucasian subjects randomly received a single subcutaneous administration of eflapegrastim, pegfilgrastim, or placebo in a ratio of 6:2:2 (Cohorts 1 and 2) or 12:2:2 (Cohorts 3–6)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean serum concentration-time profiles of eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim after a single subcutaneous administration in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Concentrations are shown in the log scale. The error bars represent the standard deviations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change from baseline in absolute neutrophil count over time after a single subcutaneous administration of eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Baseline was the last nonmissing assessment prior to dosing. The error bars denote the standard deviations. ANC absolute neutrophil count
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean change from baseline in CD34-positive cell count over time after a single subcutaneous administration of eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Baseline was the last nonmissing assessment prior to dosing. The error bars denote the standard deviations. CD34+ CD34-positive cell count
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship of eflapegrastim: a ln(AUClast) vs. ln(AUEClast of ANC) and b ln(AUClast) vs. ln (AUEClast of CD34+). ANC absolute neutrophil count, AUClast area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observed concentration, AUEClast area under the effect-time curve, CD34+ CD34-positive cell count

References

    1. Caggiano V, Weiss RV, Rickert TS, Linde-Zwirble WT. Incidence, cost, and mortality of neutropenia hospitalization associated with chemotherapy. Cancer. 2005;103:1916–1924. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20983.
    1. Mehta HM, Malandra M, Corey SJ. G-CSF and GM-CSF in neutropenia. J Immunol. 2015;195:1341–1349. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500861.
    1. Filgrastim. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacist. . Accessed 23 Jul 2021.
    1. Panopoulos AD, Watowich SS. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: molecular mechanisms of action during steady state and ‘emergency’ hematopoiesis. Cytokine. 2008;42:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.03.002.
    1. Kuwabara T, Kobayashi S, Sugiyama Y. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Drug Metab Rev. 1996;28:625–658. doi: 10.3109/03602539608994020.
    1. Ballestrero A, Boy D, Gonella R, Miglino M, Clavio M, Barbero V, et al. Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with solid tumours and lymphomas. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:49–55. doi: 10.1007/s00277-007-0366-7.
    1. Becker PS, Griffiths EA, Alwan LM, Bachiashvili K, Brown A, Cool R, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2020;18:12–22. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0002.
    1. Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, et al. Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3199–3212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488.
    1. Weycker D, Wu H, Hagiwara M, Li X, Barron RL. Use of chemotherapy and same-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice. Blood. 2014;124:4825. doi: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.4825.4825.
    1. Shin KH, Kim TE, Lim KS, Yoon SH, Cho JY, Kim SE, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HM10460A) in healthy volunteers. BioDrugs. 2013;27:149–158. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0010-0.
    1. Cobb PW, Moon YW, Mezei K, Láng I, Bhat G, Chawla S, et al. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): a phase 3 study. Cancer Med. 2020;9:6234–6243. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3227.
    1. Barrett JA, Choi J, Lakshmikanthan S, Kim Y-Y, Greene D, Kolli P, et al. Eflapegrastim's enhancement of efficacy compared with pegfilgrastim in neutropenic rats supports potential for same-day dosing. Exp Hematol. 2020;92:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2020.09.199.
    1. Kim YH, Choi I, Kolli P, Reddy G. Abstract 1347: in vivo efficacy of eflapegrastim in rats with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Can Res. 2017;77:1347.
    1. Hauschke D. Bioequivalence and statistics in clinical pharmacology. Biometrics. 2006;62:945–946. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00588_8.x.
    1. NEULASTA® (Pegfilgrastim) Injection, for Subcutaneous Use Prescribing Information. Amgen Inc.; 2021. . Accessed 27 May 2021.
    1. Abboud CN, Lang N, Fung H, Lammerich A, Buchner A, Liu P, et al. Real-world safety experience of tevagrastim/ratiograstim/biograstim and tbo-filgrastim, short-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:2569–2577. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4522-5.
    1. Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Bellodi A, Pronzato P. The five “Ws” for bone pain due to the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;89:112–128. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.08.006.
    1. Tigue CC, Mckoy JM, Evens AM, Trifilio SM, Tallman MS, Bennett CL. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration to healthy individuals and persons with chronic neutropenia or cancer: an overview of safety considerations from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports project. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:185–192. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705722.
    1. Stroncek D, Clay M, Petzoldt M, Smith J, Jaszcz W, Oldham F, et al. Treatment of normal individuals with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: donor experiences and the effects on peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and on the collection of peripheral blood stem cells. Transfusion. 1996;36:601–610. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36796323059.x.
    1. Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, Galid A, Guillem V, Gascon P, et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:29–35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.
    1. Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, et al. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:903–909. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
    1. Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, Jones SE, Shogan J, Savin M, et al. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:727–731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727.
    1. van der Auwera P, Platzer E, Xu Z-X, Schulz R, Feugeas O, Capdeville R, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of single doses of subcutaneous pegylated human G-CSF mutant (Ro 25–8315) in healthy volunteers: Comparison with single and multiple daily doses of filgrastim. Am J Hematol. 2001;66:245–251. doi: 10.1002/ajh.1052.
    1. Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S, Bjurstrom T, Lockbaum P, Roskos L, et al. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2522–2528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2522.
    1. Molineux G, Kinstler O, Briddell B, Hartley C, McElroy P, Kerzic P, et al. A new form of Filgrastim with sustained duration in vivo and enhanced ability to mobilize PBPC in both mice and humans. Exp Hematol. 1999;27:1724–1734. doi: 10.1016/S0301-472X(99)00112-5.
    1. Roskos L, Yank B, Schwab G, Lockbaum P, Molineux G, Johnston E, et al. Cytokinetic model of rmethHuG-CSF-SD/01 (SD/01) mediated granulopoiesis and the ‘self-regulation’ of SD/01 elimination in non-small cell lung cancer. Blood. 1998;92:507A. doi: 10.1182/blood.V92.2.507.
    1. Yang B, Kido A, Salfi M, Swan S, Sullivan JT. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim in subjects with various degrees of renal function. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;48:1025–1031. doi: 10.1177/0091270008320318.
    1. Vacirca JL, Chan A, Mezei K, Adoo CS, Pápai Z, Mcgregor K, et al. An open-label, dose-ranging study of Rolontis, a novel long-acting myeloid growth factor, in breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2018;7:1660–1669. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1388.
    1. Schwartzberg LS, Bhat G, Peguero J, Agajanian R, Bharadwaj JS, Restrepo A, et al. Eflapegrastim, a long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of a phase III trial. Oncologist. 2020;25(8):e1233–e1241. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0105.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir