Phase Ib/II Trial of Ribociclib in Combination with Binimetinib in Patients with NRAS-mutant Melanoma

Martin Schuler, Lisa Zimmer, Kevin B Kim, Jeffrey A Sosman, Paolo A Ascierto, Michael A Postow, Filip Y F L De Vos, Carla M L van Herpen, Matteo S Carlino, Douglas B Johnson, Carola Berking, Micaela B Reddy, Allison S Harney, Jordan D Berlin, Rodabe N Amaria, Martin Schuler, Lisa Zimmer, Kevin B Kim, Jeffrey A Sosman, Paolo A Ascierto, Michael A Postow, Filip Y F L De Vos, Carla M L van Herpen, Matteo S Carlino, Douglas B Johnson, Carola Berking, Micaela B Reddy, Allison S Harney, Jordan D Berlin, Rodabe N Amaria

Abstract

Purpose: Enhanced MAPK pathway signaling and cell-cycle checkpoint dysregulation are frequent in NRAS-mutant melanoma and, as such, the regimen of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib and the selective CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib is a rational combination.

Patients and methods: This is a phase Ib/II, open-label study of ribociclib + binimetinib in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma (NCT01781572). Primary objectives were to estimate the MTD/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination (phase Ib) and to characterize combination antitumor activity at the RP2D (phase II). Tumor genomic characterization and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were also evaluated.

Results: Ten patients (16.4%) experienced dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 of phase Ib. Overall response rate in the phase II cohort (n = 41) for the selected RP2D (binimetinib 45 mg twice daily + ribociclib 200 mg once daily, 21 days on/7 days off) was 19.5% [8/41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8-34.9]. The response rate was 32.5% (13/40; 95% CI, 20.1-48.0) in patients with NRAS mutation with concurrent alterations of CDKN2A, CDK4, or CCND1. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.6) and median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.2) for all patients. Common treatment-related toxicities included creatine phosphokinase elevation, rash, edema, anemia, nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetics and safety were consistent with single-agent data, supporting a lack of drug-drug interaction.

Conclusions: Ribociclib + binimetinib can be safely administered and is clinically active in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. Co-mutations of cell-cycle genes may define a population with greater likelihood of treatment benefit. See related commentary by Moschos, p. 2977.

©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. BID, twice daily; BINI, binimetinib; PR, partial response; QD, once daily; RIBO, ribociclib.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of (A) PFS in phase Ib dose escalation and phase II dose expansion and (B) OS in phase II dose expansion. CI confidence interval; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Tumor change from baseline by presence of cell-cycle alterations. Waterfall plot of best change from baseline (%) tumor in evaluable patients (top). Dark gray bars = no cell-cycle gene alterations; light gray bars = cell-cycle gene alterations. Oncoprint of cell-cycle gene alteration (16) by patient (bottom). Red rectangles are amplification, blue rectangles are loss of copy, and purple squares are short variants. The biomarker analysis set consisted of all patients who provided a biomarker sample for DNA sequencing and had at least one reported result, even if the result was that no gene alteration was found. PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; UN, unknown.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7–30.
    1. van Elsas A, Zerp S, van der Flier S, Kruse-Wolters M, Vacca A, Ruiter DJ, et al. . Analysis of N-ras mutations in human cutaneous melanoma: tumor heterogeneity detected by polymerase chain reaction/single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis. Recent Results Cancer Res 1995;139:57–67.
    1. Dumaz N, Hayward R, Martin J, Ogilvie L, Hedley D, Curtin JA, et al. . In melanoma, RAS mutations are accompanied by switching signaling from BRAF to CRAF and disrupted cyclic AMP signaling. Cancer Res 2006;66:9483–91.
    1. Wang Y, Becker D. Differential expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16 and p21 in the human melanocytic system. Oncogene 1996;12:1069–75.
    1. Yang G, Rajadurai A, Tsao H. Recurrent patterns of dual RB and p53 pathway inactivation in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2005;125:1242–51.
    1. Walker GJ, Flores JF, Glendening JM, Lin AH, Markl ID, Fountain JW. Virtually 100% of melanoma cell lines harbor alterations at the DNA level within CDKN2A, CDKN2B, or one of their downstream targets. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998;22:157–63.
    1. Kwong LN, Costello JC, Liu H, Jiang S, Helms TL, Langsdorf AE, et al. . Oncogenic NRAS signaling differentially regulates survival and proliferation in melanoma. Nat Med 2012;18:1503–10.
    1. Hélias-Rodzewicz Z, Funck-Brentano E, Terrones N, Beauchet A, Zimmermann U, Marin C, et al. . Variation of mutant allele frequency in NRAS Q61 mutated melanomas. BMC Dermatol 2017;17:9.
    1. Dummer R, Ascierto PA, Gogas HJ, Arance A, Mandala M, Liszkay G, et al. . Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1315–27.
    1. Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Ascierto PA, Arance A, Dutriaux C, Di Giacomo AM, et al. . Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:435–45.
    1. Bendell JC, Javle M, Bekaii-Saab TS, Finn RS, Wainberg ZA, Laheru DA, et al. . A phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study of binimetinib (MEK162), a potent and selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor. Br J Cancer 2017;116:575–83.
    1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. KISQALI® (ribociclib) prescribing information; 2019.
    1. Infante JR, Cassier PA, Gerecitano JF, Witteveen PO, Chugh R, Ribrag V, et al. . A phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:5696–705.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47.
    1. He Y, Zhou J, Ma S, Nie Y, Yue D, Jiang Q, et al. . Multi-responsive “turn-on” nanocarriers for efficient site-specific gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Adv Healthc Mater 2016;5:2799–812.
    1. Munoz-Couselo E, Adelantado EZ, Ortiz C, Garcia JS, Perez-Garcia J. NRAS-mutant melanoma: current challenges and future prospect. Onco Targets Ther 2017;10:3941–7.
    1. Sosman JA, Kittaneh M, Lolkema MPJK, Postow MA, Schwartz G, Franklin C, et al. . A phase 1b/2 study of LEE011 in combination with binimetinib (MEK162) in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma: early encouraging clinical activity. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:9009.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir