Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carboplatin administered in a high-dose combination regimen with thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and peripheral stem cell support

L J van Warmerdam, S Rodenhuis, E van der Wall, R A Maes, J H Beijnen, L J van Warmerdam, S Rodenhuis, E van der Wall, R A Maes, J H Beijnen

Abstract

The aim of this pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study was to define the relationships of the carboplatin exposure with the toxicity in patients treated with high dose carboplatin (400 mg m-2 day-1), cyclophosphamide (1500 mg m-2 day-1) and thiotepa (120 mg m-2 day-1) for four consecutive days, followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation. Exposure to carboplatin was studied in 200 treatment days by measuring the area under the carboplatin plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) concentration vs time curve (AUC). The AUC was obtained by using a previously validated limited sampling model. A total of 31 patients was studied who received one, two or three courses of this high-dose chemotherapy regimen. The unbound, plasma ultrafiltrate carboplatin was almost completely cleared from the body before each next treatment day in a course; the day-to-day AUC variation was 3.3%. The mean cumulative AUC over 4 days was 19.6 (range 14.1-27.2) mg ml-1 min-1. In 97 treatment days the carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). For these courses, the inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics was significantly reduced from 21% to 15% (P = 0.007) in comparison with the schemes where it was given as a fixed dose of 400 mg m-2. There were no relationships found between toxicity and the AUC of carboplatin, which may be due to the influence of overlapping toxicities of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. However, the ototoxicity was strongly related to the cumulative carboplatin AUC. This toxicity was dose limiting for carboplatin in this schedule. It appeared that the carboplatin pharmacokinetics in these regimens were similar to those reported at conventional dosages. To reduce the inter-patient variation, the carboplatin dose can be calculated using the Calvert-formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the GFR.

References

    1. Cancer Res. 1993 Aug 15;53(16):3730-5
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jun;11(6):1156-64
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Nov;11(11):2118-26
    1. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1994;120(7):427-33
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jun;12(6):1223-31
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;35(2):179-81
    1. Ann Oncol. 1994 Nov;5(9):795-802
    1. Br J Cancer. 1995 Apr;71(4):857-62
    1. Cancer Invest. 1995;13(4):355-62
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Feb;5(2):197-201
    1. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 Sep;23(9):1399-405
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1988;21(1):61-4
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 1;110(1):51-65
    1. Drugs. 1989 Feb;37(2):162-90
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1989 May;7(5):651-61
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Nov;7(11):1748-56
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Jan;10(1):102-10
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991 Oct;21(4):242-61
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Apr;10(4):520-8
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993;31(4):324-7
    1. Cancer Treat Rev. 1993;19 Suppl C:11-20

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir