Immunopotentiation of trivalent influenza vaccine when given with VAX102, a recombinant influenza M2e vaccine fused to the TLR5 ligand flagellin

H Keipp Talbot, Michael T Rock, Casey Johnson, Lynda Tussey, Uma Kavita, Anita Shanker, Alan R Shaw, David N Taylor, H Keipp Talbot, Michael T Rock, Casey Johnson, Lynda Tussey, Uma Kavita, Anita Shanker, Alan R Shaw, David N Taylor

Abstract

Background: Currently controversy exists about the immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine in certain populations, especially the elderly. STF2.4×M2e (VAX102) is a recombinant fusion protein that links four copies of the ectodomain of influenza virus matrix protein 2 (M2e) antigen to Salmonella typhimurium flagellin, a TLR5 ligand. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of giving VAX102 and TIV in combination in an effort to achieve greater immunogenicity and to provide cross-protection.

Methodology/principal findings: Eighty healthy subjects, 18-49 years old, were enrolled in May and June 2009 in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial at two clinical sites. Subjects were randomized to receive either TIV + VAX102 or TIV + placebo. Both arms tolerated the vaccines. Pain at the injection site was more severe with TIV + VAX102. Two weeks after immunization the HAI responses to the H1 and H3 antigens of TIV were higher in those that received TIV + VAX102 than in TIV + placebo (309 vs 200 and 269 vs 185, respectively), although statistically non-significant. There was no difference in the HAI of the B antigen. In the TIV + VAX102 arm, the geometric mean M2e antibody concentration was 0.5 µg/ml and 73% seroconverted.

Conclusions/significance: The combination of TIV + VAX102 has the potential to increase the immune response to the influenza A components of TIV and to provide M2e immunity which may protect against influenza A strains not contained in seasonal TIV.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00921973.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: HKBT has received research funding from Protein Sciences, VaxInnate, Sanofi Pasteur and Wyeth. MR has no conflicts of interest. Casey Johnson works for Johnson County Clin-Trials, which was hired by VaxInnate. Anita Shanker works for Health Decisions, which was hired by VaxInnate for data management. Lynda Tussey, Uma Kavita, Alan Shaw and David Taylor work for VaxInnate. This will not interfere with sharing data.

Figures

Figure 1. Comparison of Geometric Mean HAI…
Figure 1. Comparison of Geometric Mean HAI Titers among subjects who received TIV +placebo or TIV plus VAX102.

References

    1. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, et al. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. Jama. 2003;289:179–186.
    1. Poland GA, Mulligan MJ. The imperative of influenza vaccines for elderly individuals-an evolving story. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:161–163.
    1. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:152–179.
    1. Treanor JJ, Tierney EL, Zebedee SL, Lamb RA, Murphy BR. Passively transferred monoclonal antibody to the M2 protein inhibits influenza A virus replication in mice. J Virol. 1990;64:1375–1377.
    1. Huleatt JW, Nakaar V, Desai P, Huang Y, Hewitt D, et al. Potent immunogenicity and efficacy of a universal influenza vaccine candidate comprising a recombinant fusion protein linking influenza M2e to the TLR5 ligand flagellin. Vaccine. 2008;26:201–214.
    1. Baldwin SL, Shaverdian N, Goto Y, Duthie MS, Raman VS, et al. Enhanced humoral and Type 1 cellular immune responses with Fluzone adjuvanted with a synthetic TLR4 agonist formulated in an emulsion. Vaccine. 2009;27:5956–5963.
    1. Goodwin K, Viboud C, Simonsen L. Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: a quantitative review. Vaccine. 2006;24:1159–1169.
    1. Kendal AP, Pereira MS, Skehel JJ, editors. Atlanta,, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Pan American Health Organization; 1982. Concepts and Procedures for Laboratory-Based Influenza Surveillance.
    1. Ohigashi Y, Ma C, Jing X, Balannick V, Pinto LH, et al. An amantadine-sensitive chimeric BM2 ion channel of influenza B virus has implications for the mechanism of drug inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:18775–18779.
    1. Falsey AR, Treanor JJ, Tornieporth N, Capellan J, Gorse GJ. Randomized, double-blind controlled phase 3 trial comparing the immunogenicity of high-dose and standard-dose influenza vaccine in adults 65 years of age and older. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:172–180.
    1. Cherry James D, Chang SJ, Klein D, Lee M, Barenkamp S, et al. Prevalence of Antibody to Bordetella pertussis Antigens in Serum Specimens Obtained from 1793 Adolescents and Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;39:1715–1718.
    1. Fan J, Liang X, Horton MS, Perry HC, Citron MP, et al. Preclinical study of influenza virus A M2 peptide conjugate vaccines in mice, ferrets, and rhesus monkeys. Vaccine. 2004;22:2993–3003.
    1. Black S, Kushner I, Samols D. C-reactive Protein. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48487–48490.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir