Five-Year Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in the Horsens-Aarhus Femoroacetabular Impingement (HAFAI) Cohort

Signe Kierkegaard, Inger Mechlenburg, Ulrik Dalgas, Bent Lund, Signe Kierkegaard, Inger Mechlenburg, Ulrik Dalgas, Bent Lund

Abstract

Background: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are offered hip arthroscopic surgery to decrease hip pain, improve their function, and decrease development of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Nonetheless, long-term follow-up data are few.

Purpose: To investigate patient-reported outcomes, clinical tests, reoperations, and radiographic status 5 years after primary hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A total of 60 patients (age, 36 ± 9 years; 63% female) diagnosed with FAIS were included in the study and followed for 5 years after hip arthroscopy. Follow-up included Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS); Hip Sports Activity Scale; and clinical tests (flexion, adduction, internal rotation [FADIR]; flexion, abduction, external rotation [FABER]; and psoas muscle/tendon major pain provocation). Radiographic evaluation included lateral joint-space width (LJSW) and Tönnis classification for hip OA. Reoperations and conversion to total hip replacement (THR) were recorded. We calculated the proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal important change (MIC), achieved the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and were within the 95% reference interval of age- and sex-matched persons with no hip problems. Changes were investigated using paired t tests.

Results: Compared with preoperatively, all HAGOS subscales were improved substantially 5 years after surgery (mean, ≥21 points; P < .001), and 67% to 89% of patients reported improvements exceeding MIC. Between 56% and 80% achieved PASS, but only 7% to 24% reached the 95% reference interval for the HAGOS subscales. A total of 36% had a positive FADIR test and 25% had a positive FABER test, which were improvements compared with preoperatively (P < .001 for both). Patients with a positive FADIR test had significantly worse HAGOS subscales. Six patients (10%) had a THR since their primary hip arthroscopy. In the remaining patients, the mean LJSW was decreased (-0.4 mm; P = .043), and hip OA had worsened in 9 patients (23%; P = .003).

Conclusion: Five years after surgery, the majority of patients experienced HAGOS improvements exceeding MIC while also showing an acceptable PASS. However, clinical tests, participation in physical activities, and quality of life indicated that many patients still experience hip problems.

Registration: NCT04590924 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Keywords: clinical tests; femoroacetabular impingement; hip arthroscopy; hip osteoarthritis; patient-reported outcomes; total hip replacement.

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding for this study was received from The Health Research Fund in the Middle Region of Denmark and the Augustinus Foundation. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

© The Author(s) 2022.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of patients from before hip arthroscopic surgery to the 5-year follow-up in the Horsens-Aarhus femoroacetabular impingement (HAFAI) cohort; 7 of 10 patients requiring reoperation and 2 of 6 patients who underwent total hip replacement completed the 5-year patient-reported outcome measures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
HAGOS subscale values (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = no problems) before, 1 year after, and 5 years after surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the Horsens-Aarhus femoroacetabular impingement cohort. *Statistically significant difference from before to 5 years after surgery. ADL, activities of daily living; HAGOS, Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score; PA, participation in physical activities; QoL, hip-related quality of life.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
HAGOS subscale values (0 = worst imaginable, 100 = no problems) for positive (ie, abnormal test result) and negative (ie, normal test result) ratings of (A) flexion, adduction, internal rotation (FADIR) test, (B) flexion, abduction, external rotation (FABER) test, and (C) psoas test. *Statistically significant difference (P < .05). ADL, activities of daily living; HAGOS, Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score; PA, participation in physical activities; QoL, hip-related quality of life.

References

    1. Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Arden NK, et al. Cam impingement of the hip---a risk factor for hip osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(10):630–634.
    1. Busse J, Gasteiger W, Tönnis D. [A new method for roentgenologic evaluation of the hip joint---the hip factor]. Article in German. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1972;72(1):1–9.
    1. Domb BG, Chen SL, Go CC, et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy: 5-year follow-up analysis of 1038 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):112–120.
    1. Gold GE, Cicuttini F, Crema MD, et al. OARSI clinical trials recommendations: hip imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(5):716–731.
    1. Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O’Donnell J, et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(19):1169–1176.
    1. Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, et al. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2225–2235.
    1. Hevesi M, Krych AJ, Johnson NR, et al. Multicenter analysis of midterm clinical outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(2):280–287.
    1. Ishøi L, Thorborg K, Kraemer O, Hölmich P. Return to sport and performance after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in 18- to 30-year-old athletes: a cross-sectional cohort study of 189 athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(11):2578–2587.
    1. Ishøi L, Thorborg K, Ørum MG, Kemp JL, Reiman MP, Hölmich P. How many patients achieve an acceptable symptom state after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome? A cross-sectional study including PASS cutoff values for the HAGOS and iHOT-33. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(4):2325967121995267.
    1. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2065–2073.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Dalgas U, Lund B, Lipperts M, Soballe K, Mechlenburg I. Despite patient-reported outcomes improve, patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome do not increase their objectively measured sport and physical activity level 1 year after hip arthroscopic surgery. Results from the HAFAI cohort. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(5):1639–1647.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Langeskov-Christensen M, Lund B, et al. Pain, activities of daily living and sport function at different time points after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(7):572–579.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Lund B, Dalgas U, Sorensen H, Soballe K, Mechlenburg I. The Horsens-Aarhus Femoro Acetabular Impingement (HAFAI) cohort: outcome of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008952.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Mechlenburg I, Lund B, Romer L, Soballe K, Dalgas U. Is hip muscle strength normalised in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome one year after surgery? Results from the HAFAI cohort. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(4):413–419.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Mechlenburg I, Lund B, Soballe K, Dalgas U. Impaired hip muscle strength in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(12):1062–1067.
    1. Kierkegaard S, Rømer L, Lund B, Dalgas U, Søballe K, Mechlenburg I. No association between femoral or acetabular angles and patient-reported outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome-results from the HAFAI cohort. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020;7(2):242–248.
    1. Lund B, Mygind-Klavsen B, Gronbech Nielsen T, et al. Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR): the outcome of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;4(2):170–177.
    1. MacDonald S, Garbuz D, Ganz R. Clinical evaluation of the symptomatic young adult hip. Semin Arthroplasty. 1997;8:3–9.
    1. Magee D. Orthopaedic Physical Assessment. 3rd ed. W.B. Saunders Company; 1997.
    1. Maheu E, Cadet C, Marty M, et al. Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of various methods to measure joint space width in osteoarthritis of the hip: a double reading of three different radiographic views taken with a three-year interval. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(6):R1375–R1385.
    1. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Sekiya JK. The diagnostic accuracy of a clinical examination in determining intra-articular hip pain for potential hip arthroscopy candidates. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1013–1018.
    1. Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(12):1304–1311.
    1. Mygind-Klavsen B, Nielsen TG, Lund B, Lind M. Clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are inferior compared to primary procedures. Results from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020:29(4):1340–1348.
    1. Naal FD, Miozzari HH, Kelly BT, Magennis EM, Leunig M, Noetzli HP. The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) for patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2013;23(2):204–211.
    1. Öhlin A, Ahldén M, Lindman I, et al. Good 5-year outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(4):1311–1316.
    1. Pålsson A, Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E. Combining results from hip impingement and range of motion tests can increase diagnostic accuracy in patients with FAI syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(10):3382–3392.
    1. Reiman MP, Agricola R, Kemp JL, et al. Consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(11):631–641.
    1. Sajko S, Stuber K. Psoas Major: a case report and review of its anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical implications. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009;53(4):311–318.
    1. Skendzel JG, Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Goljan P. The effect of joint space on midterm outcomes after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1127–1133.
    1. Spiker AM, Degen RM, Camp CL, Coleman SH. Arthroscopic psoas management: techniques for psoas preservation and psoas tenotomy. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(6):e1487–e1492.
    1. Thorborg K, Kraemer O, Madsen AD, Hölmich P. Patient-reported outcomes within the first year after hip arthroscopy and rehabilitation for femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral injury: the difference between getting better and getting back to normal. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(11):2607–2614.
    1. Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. Springer; 1987.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):805–835.
    1. Wörner T, Thorborg K, Stålman A, Webster KE, Momatz Olsson H, Eek F. High or low return to sport rates following hip arthroscopy is a matter of definition? Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(22):1475–1476.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir