The 'Pleasure&Pregnancy' web-based interactive educational programme versus expectant management in the treatment of unexplained subfertility: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Eline A F Dancet, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Felicia Dreischor, Madelon van Wely, Ellen T M Laan, Cornelius B Lambalk, Sjoerd Repping, Inge M Custers, Eline A F Dancet, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Felicia Dreischor, Madelon van Wely, Ellen T M Laan, Cornelius B Lambalk, Sjoerd Repping, Inge M Custers

Abstract

Introduction: Many subfertile couples are diagnosed with (relatively) unexplained subfertility and a good prognosis. National professional guidelines (eg, the Netherlands and UK) advise 'expectant management (EM)' for 6-12 months, in which no interaction with healthcare staff is offered. Underpowered studies indicate that face-to-face sex-counselling increases the ongoing pregnancy rates of these couples. In patients with other conditions, web-based interactive educational programmes have the same effect on sexual functioning as face-to-face sex counselling. The 'Pleasure&Pregnancy randomised controlled trial (RCT)' will examine in couples with unexplained subfertility and a good prognosis whether a new web-based interactive educational programme results in a higher chance of naturally conceiving an ongoing pregnancy within 6 months as compared with EM.

Methods and analysis: A multicentre RCT with cost-effectiveness analysis will include heterosexual couples diagnosed with (relatively) unexplained subfertility and a good prognosis in Dutch and Belgian secondary or tertiary fertility clinics. Couples will be randomised between 6 months of EM and 6 months of the Pleasure&Pregnancy-programme. This new web-based interactive educational programme includes eight progressive modules of information (on the biology of conception and pleasurable sex) and sensate focus, couple communication and mindfulness exercises. Couples are offered interaction with their coaches via email and can take part in three moderated chat sessions with peers. The primary outcome of this RCT is the probability of naturally conceiving an ongoing pregnancy within 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include time-to-pregnancy, live birth rate, costs, sexual functioning and personal and relational well-being. Analysis will be according to intention to treat.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committees of the Academic Medical Centre (the Netherlands) and the Leuven University Hospital (Belgium). The findings of this RCT will be disseminated through presentations at international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications.

Trail registration number: NTR5709; Pre-results.

Keywords: patient education; randomized controlled trial; sexuality; subfertility.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart of the Pleasure&Pregnancy-RCT. (PROMs, patient reported outcome measures; RCT, randomised controlled trial).

References

    1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, et al. . International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506–12. 10.1093/humrep/dem046
    1. van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ, et al. . CECERM study group (Collaborative Effort for Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine). Pregnancy is predictable: a large-scale prospective external validation of the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 2007;22:536–42.
    1. NVOG Richtlijn: Onverklaarde subfertiliteit: 2010-09-15, Versie: 1.0. (Accessed 23 Oct 2018).
    1. Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Hompes PG, et al. . Collaborative Effort on the Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2006;368:216–21.
    1. van Asselt K, Hinloopen RJ, Silvius AM, et al. . Preconceptiezorg, wiens zorg eigenlijk? Huisarts Wet 2010;53:2–14. 10.1007/s12445-010-0002-y
    1. NICE guideline: Fertility problems: assessment and treatment, 2004. Revised Feb 2013.
    1. Sarrel PM, DeCherney AH. Psychotherapeutic intervention for treatment of couples with secondary infertility. Fertil Steril 1985;43:897–900.
    1. Tuschen-Caffier B, Florin I, Krause W, et al. . Cognitive-behavioral therapy for idiopathic infertile couples. Psychother Psychosom 1999;68:15–21. 10.1159/000012305
    1. Perlis N, Lo KC, Grober ED, et al. . Coital frequency and infertility: which male factors predict less frequent coitus among infertile couples? Fertil Steril 2013;100:511–5. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.020
    1. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1517–21. 10.1056/NEJM199512073332301
    1. Hawton K, Catalan J, Fagg J. Low sexual desire: sex therapy results and prognostic factors. Behav Res Ther 1991;29:217–24.
    1. Schover LR, Canada AL, Yuan Y, et al. . A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 2012;118:500–9. 10.1002/cncr.26308
    1. Dreischor, et al. . The development of the Pleasure&Pregnancy-programme. 2019, In preparation.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing reserch: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.
    1. Pleasure&Pregnancy-RCT webpage on the ‘Zorgevaluatie’ website. (Accessed 24 Oct 2018).
    1. Hunault CC, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, et al. . Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2019–26. 10.1093/humrep/deh365
    1. (Accessed 3 Mar 2015).
    1. Adamson GD, Baker VL. Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003;17:169–85.
    1. Fuchs VR. Current challenges to academic health centers. JAMA 2013;310:1021–2. 10.1001/jama.2013.227197
    1. NVOG, email betreffende evaluatie kennishiaten. 2014.
    1. van den Boogaard NM, Musters AM, Brühl SW, et al. . Tailored expectant management: a nationwide survey to quantify patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators. Hum Reprod 2012;27:1050–7. 10.1093/humrep/des010
    1. van den Boogaard NM, van den Boogaard E, Bokslag A, et al. . Patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators of tailored expectant management in subfertile couples with a good prognosis of a natural conception. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2122–8. 10.1093/humrep/der175
    1. Anderson L, Lewis SE, McClure N. The effects of coital lubricants on sperm motility in vitro. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3351–6. 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3351
    1. Laan E, Both S. Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women. Adv PsychosomMed 2011;31:16–34.
    1. Masters W, Johnson V. Human Sexual Inadequacy. Toronto; New York: Bantam Books, 1970.
    1. Jones LM, McCabe MP. The effectiveness of an Internet-based psychological treatment program for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 2011;8:2781–92. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02381.x
    1. Hucker A, McCabe MP. Incorporating Mindfulness and Chat Groups Into an Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Mixed Female Sexual Problems. J Sex Res 2015;52:627–39. 10.1080/00224499.2014.888388
    1. Brotto LA, Krychman M, Jacobson P. Eastern approaches for enhancing women’s sexuality: mindfulness, acupuncture, and yoga (CME). J Sex Med 2008;5:2741–8. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01071.x
    1. Fahami F, Pahlavanzadeh S, Asadi M. Efficacy of communication skills training workshop on sexual function in infertile women. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2015;20:179–83.
    1. Braakhekke M, Kamphuis EI, Dancet EA, et al. . Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1203–4. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.047
    1. Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2325–41.
    1. de Liz TM, Strauss B. Differential efficacy of group and individual/couple psychotherapy with infertile patients. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1324–32. 10.1093/humrep/deh743
    1. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgård NG, et al. . Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006592 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592
    1. Hämmerli K, Znoj H, Barth J. The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental health and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:279–95. 10.1093/humupd/dmp002
    1. Verkuijlen J, Verhaak C, Nelen WL, et al. . Psychological and educational interventions for subfertile men and women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD011034 10.1002/14651858.CD011034.pub2
    1. Levin RJ. The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: a recreational and procreational synthesis. Arch Sex Behav 2002;31:405–11.
    1. Wildt L, Kissler S, Licht P, et al. . Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and Doppler sonography. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:655–66. 10.1093/humupd/4.5.655
    1. Blaicher W, Gruber D, Bieglmayer C, et al. . The role of oxytocin in relation to female sexual arousal. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;47:125–6. 10.1159/000010075
    1. Pound N, Javed MH, Ruberto C, et al. . Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiol Behav 2002;76(4-5):685–9.
    1. van Roijen JH, Slob AK, Gianotten WL, et al. . Sexual arousal and the quality of semen produced by masturbation. Hum Reprod 1996;11:147–51. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019008
    1. Kutteh WH, Chao CH, Ritter JO, et al. . Vaginal lubricants for the infertile couple: effect on sperm activity. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996;41:400–4.
    1. Custers IM, van Rumste MM, van der Steeg JW, et al. . Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment. Hum Reprod 2012;27:444–50. 10.1093/humrep/der389
    1. Bloch M, Azem F, Aharonov I, et al. . GnRH-agonist induced depressive and anxiety symptoms during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2011;95:307–9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1073
    1. Bouwmans CA, Lintsen BA, Al M, et al. . Absence from work and emotional stress in women undergoing IVF or ICSI: an analysis of IVF-related absence from work in women and the contribution of general and emotional factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:1169–75. 10.1080/00016340802460305
    1. Bouwmans CA, Lintsen BM, Eijkemans MJ, et al. . A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil Steril 2008;89:331–41. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.003
    1. Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Prein J, et al. . Growth during infancy and early childhood in relation to blood pressure and body fat measures at age 8-18 years of IVF children and spontaneously conceived controls born to subfertile parents. Hum Reprod 2009;24:2788–95. 10.1093/humrep/dep273
    1. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. . Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1803–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1008095
    1. Hart R, Norman RJ. The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment: Part I-General health outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:232–43. 10.1093/humupd/dms062
    1. Fauser BC, Devroey P, Macklon NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet 2005;365:1807–16. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66478-1
    1. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. . Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18:485–503. 10.1093/humupd/dms018
    1. Sanders SA, Herbenick D, Reece M, et al. . The development and validation of a brief Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) scale: results from a nationally representative sample of men and women in the United States. J Sex Med 2013;10:2409–17. 10.1111/jsm.12198
    1. Mulhall JP, King R, Kirby M, et al. . Evaluating the sexual experience in men: validation of the sexual experience questionnaire. J Sex Med 2008;5:365–76. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00694.x
    1. Nederlandse vereniging voor seksuologie. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. FSFI Questionnaire. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. ter Kuile MM, Brauer M, Laan E. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): psychometric properties within a Dutch population. J Sex Marital Ther 2006;32:289–304. 10.1080/00926230600666261
    1. IJselland Ziekenhuis. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 2002;14:226–44. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900857
    1. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822–30.
    1. Hand & Pols Centrum Dordrecht. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. EQ-5D. (Accessed 6 Apr 2014).
    1. Tran BX, Ohinmaa A, Nguyen LT. Quality of life profile and psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in HIV/AIDS patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:132 10.1186/1477-7525-10-132
    1. Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, et al. . A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther 1995;21:289–308. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
    1. Stavem K, Frøland SS, Hellum KB. Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS. Qual Life Res 2005;14:971–80.
    1. Aggarwal R, Wilke CT, Pickard AS, et al. . Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1209–16. 10.3899/jrheum.081022
    1. Cardiff University Fertility quality of life tool. (Accessed 1 Dec 2017).
    1. Cardiff University Fertility quality of life tool. (Accessed 1 Dec 2017).
    1. Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Boivin J, et al. . Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1112–8. 10.1093/humrep/der051
    1. Psychiatrie Web. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. Registry of Scales and Measures. (Accessed 6 Apr 2014).
    1. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, et al. . A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med 1997;27:363–70.
    1. Amini P, Maroufizadeh S, Omani Samani R. Evaluating the factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency of hospital anxiety and depression scale in Iranian infertile patients. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017;15:287–96.
    1. The Relationship Doc. (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
    1. Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, et al. . A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and non-distressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1995;21:289–308.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir