A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication

Victoria A Wade, Jonathan Karnon, Adam G Elshaug, Janet E Hiller, Victoria A Wade, Jonathan Karnon, Adam G Elshaug, Janet E Hiller

Abstract

Background: Telehealth is the delivery of health care at a distance, using information and communication technology. The major rationales for its introduction have been to decrease costs, improve efficiency and increase access in health care delivery. This systematic review assesses the economic value of one type of telehealth delivery--synchronous or real time video communication--rather than examining a heterogeneous range of delivery modes as has been the case with previous reviews in this area.

Methods: A systematic search was undertaken for economic analyses of the clinical use of telehealth, ending in June 2009. Studies with patient outcome data and a non-telehealth comparator were included. Cost analyses, non-comparative studies and those where patient satisfaction was the only health outcome were excluded.

Results: 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. 22(61%) of the studies found telehealth to be less costly than the non-telehealth alternative, 11(31%) found greater costs and 3 (9%) gave the same or mixed results. 23 of the studies took the perspective of the health services, 12 were societal, and one was from the patient perspective. In three studies of telehealth to rural areas, the health services paid more for telehealth, but due to savings in patient travel, the societal perspective demonstrated cost savings. In regard to health outcomes, 12 (33%) of studies found improved health outcomes, 21 (58%) found outcomes were not significantly different, 2(6%) found that telehealth was less effective, and 1 (3%) found outcomes differed according to patient group. The organisational model of care was more important in determining the value of the service than the clinical discipline, the type of technology, or the date of the study.

Conclusion: Delivery of health services by real time video communication was cost-effective for home care and access to on-call hospital specialists, showed mixed results for rural service delivery, and was not cost-effective for local delivery of services between hospitals and primary care.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study inclusions.

References

    1. Higgins C, Dunn E, Conrath D. Telemedicine: an historical perspective. Telecommunications Policy. 1984;8:307–313. doi: 10.1016/0308-5961(84)90044-2.
    1. Fragmentation to integration: national scoping study: the telemedicine industry in Australia.
    1. Bashshur RL, Reardon TG, Shannon GW. Telemedicine: a new health care delivery system. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:613–637. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.613.
    1. Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, Merrell RC. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:573–590. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0073.
    1. Tulu B, Chatterjee S, Maheshwari M. Telemedicine taxonomy: a classification tool. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2007;13:349–358. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0055.
    1. Cusack C, Pan E, Hook J, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Middleton B. The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2008;14:167–168. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2007.007043.
    1. Hakansson S, Gavelin C. What do we really know about the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine? J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S133–136. doi: 10.1258/1357633001934438.
    1. Mair FS, Haycox A, May C, Williams T. A review of telemedicine cost-effectiveness studies. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S38–40. doi: 10.1258/1357633001934096.
    1. Whitten P, Kingsley C, Grigsby J. Results of a meta-analysis of cost-benefit research: is this a question worth asking? J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S4–6. doi: 10.1258/1357633001934177.
    1. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. Cmaj. 2001;165:765–771.
    1. Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. Bmj. 2002;324:1434–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434.
    1. Jennett PA, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9:311–320. doi: 10.1258/135763303771005207.
    1. Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R. Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:318–324. doi: 10.1258/1357633042602053.
    1. Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddard G, Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Monnier J, Knapp RG, Frueh BC. Recent advances in telepsychiatry: an updated review. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:1604–1609. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.12.1604.
    1. Norman S. The use of telemedicine in psychiatry. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006;13:771–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.01033.x.
    1. Hilty DM, Marks SL, Urness D, Yellowlees PM, Nesbitt TS. Clinical and educational telepsychiatry applications: a review. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49:12–23.
    1. Brebner JA, Brebner EM, Ruddick-Bracken H. Accident and emergency teleconsultation for primary care--a systematic review of technical feasibility, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and level of local management. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(Suppl 1):5–8. doi: 10.1258/135763306777978542.
    1. Cummings J, Krsek C, Vermoch K, Matuszewski K. Intensive care telemedicine: review and consensus recommendations. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2007;22:239–250. doi: 10.1177/1062860607302777.
    1. Pare G, Jaana M, Sicotte C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:269–277. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2270.
    1. Martinez A, Everss E, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Figal DP, Garcia-Alberola A. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12:234–241. doi: 10.1258/135763306777889109.
    1. Seto E. Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:679–686. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0114.
    1. Bergmo TS. Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Eff and Resourc Alloc. 2009;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-7-18.
    1. Chiou CH, Hay JW, Wallace JF, Bloom BS, Neumann PJ, Sullivan SD, Yu HT, Keeler EB, Henning JM, Ofman JJ. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Medical Care. 2003;41:32–44. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00007.
    1. Ohinmaa A, Vuolio S, Haukipuro K, Winblad L. A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2002;8:283–289. doi: 10.1258/135763302760314252.
    1. Loane MA, Oakley A, Rademaker M, Bradford N, Fleischl P, Kerr P, Wootton R. A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2001;7:233–238. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936453.
    1. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Evans C, Hicks N, Jacklin P, Lotery HE, Mathews C, Paisley J. et al.A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of real-time teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2001;7:108–118. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936246.
    1. Persaud DD, Jreige S, Skedgel C, Finley J, Sargeant J, Hanlon N. An incremental cost analysis of telehealth in Nova Scotia from a societal perspective. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2005;11:77–84. doi: 10.1258/1357633053499877.
    1. Shore JH, Brooks E, Savin DM, Manson SM, Libby AM. An economic evaluation of telehealth data collection with rural populations. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:830–835. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.830.
    1. Bergmo TS. An economic analysis of teleconsultation in otorhinolaryngology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 1997;3:194–199. doi: 10.1258/1357633971931156.
    1. Pronovost A, Peng P, Kern R. Telemedicine in the management of chronic pain: A cost analysis study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2009;56:590–596. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9123-9.
    1. Loane MA, Oakley A, Rademaker M, Bradford N, Fleischl P, Kerr P, Wootton R. A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7:233–238. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936453.
    1. Ohinmaa A, Vuolio S, Haukipuro K, Winblad I. A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8:283–289. doi: 10.1258/135763302760314252.
    1. Dowie R, Mistry H, Young TA, Weatherburn GC, Gardiner HM, Rigby M, Rowlinson GV, Franklin RCG. Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: Economic evaluation of a service in English hospitals. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2007;23:116–125. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051653.
    1. Crow SJ, Mitchell JE, Crosby RD, Swanson SA, Wonderlich S, Lancanster K. The cost effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa delivered via telemedicine versus face-to-face. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2009;47:451–453. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.006.
    1. Chua R, Craig J, Wootton R, Patterson V. Cost implications of outpatient teleneurology. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(Suppl 1):62–64. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936769.
    1. Jerant AF, Azari R, Nesbitt TS. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care. 2001;39:1234–1245. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00010.
    1. Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Potthoff S. Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12:128–136. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.128.
    1. Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH. Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:40–45. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.40.
    1. Eron L, Marineau M. Telemedicine: treating infections in the home. Infections in Medicine. 2006;23:517.
    1. Bohnenkamp SK, McDonald P, Lopez AM, Krupinski E, Blackett A. Traditional versus telenursing outpatient management of patients with cancer with new ostomies. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31:1005–1010. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1005-1010.
    1. Smith CE, Cha JJ, Kleinbeck SVM, Clements FA, Cook D, Koehler J. Feasibility of in-home telehealth for conducting nursing research. Clinical Nursing Research. 2002;11:220–233.
    1. DeMaio J, Schwartz L, Cooley P, Tice A. The application of telemedicine technology to a directly observed therapy program for tuberculosis: a pilot project. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:2082–2084. doi: 10.1086/324506.
    1. Johnston B. Outcomes of the kaiser permanente tele-home health research project. Archives of Family Medicine. 2000;9:40–45. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.40.
    1. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, Mathews C, Paisley J, Steele K, Wootton R. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1241–1247. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03895.x.
    1. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, Mathews C, Paisley J, Steele K, Loane MA. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. Bmj. 2000;320:1252–1256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1252.
    1. Jacklin PB, Roberts JA, Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber JA, Thompson SG, Lewis L, Currell R, Parker S, Wainwright P. Virtual outreach: economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion. Bmj. 2003;327:84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7406.84.
    1. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, Mathews C, Paisley J, Steele K, Loane MA. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. Bmj. 2000;320:1252–1256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1252.
    1. Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA, Doerfler M, Burke G, Yates G, Stone DJ, Tomaszewicz P, Hochman R, Plocher DW. Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:31–38. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104204.61296.41.
    1. Rosenfeld BA, Dorman T, Breslow MJ, Pronovost P, Jenckes M, Zhang N, Anderson G, Rubin H. Intensive care unit telemedicine: alternate paradigm for providing continuous intensivist care. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3925–3931. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00034.
    1. Ruskin PE, Silver-Aylaian M, Kling MA, Reed SA, Bradham DD, Hebel JR, Barrett D, Knowles F, Hauser P. Treatment outcomes in depression: comparison of remote treatment through telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:1471–1476. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1471.
    1. Bergmo TS. An economic analysis of teleconsultation in otorhinolaryngology. J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3:194–199. doi: 10.1258/1357633971931156.
    1. Persaud DD, Jreige S, Skedgel C, Finley J, Sargeant J, Hanlon N. An incremental cost analysis of telehealth in Nova Scotia from a societal perspective. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:77–84. doi: 10.1258/1357633053499877.
    1. Oakley AMM, Kerr P, Duffill M, Rademaker M, Fleischl P, Bradford N, Mills C. Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology - A comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2000;6:97–101. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935112.
    1. Sable C, Roca T, Gold J, Gutierrez A, Gulotta E, Culpepper W. Live transmission of neonatal echocardiograms from underserved areas: accuracy, patient care, and cost. Telemed J. 1999;5:339–347. doi: 10.1089/107830299311907.
    1. Sicotte C, Lehoux P, Van Doesburg N, Cardinal G, Leblanc Y. A cost-effectiveness analysis of interactive paediatric telecardiology. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:78–83. doi: 10.1258/135763304773391503.
    1. Duchesne JC, Kyle A, Simmons J, Islam S, Schmieg RE Jr, Olivier J, McSwain NE Jr. Impact of telemedicine upon rural trauma care. J Trauma. 2008;64:92–97. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815dd4c4. discussion 97-98.
    1. Chan HH, Woo J, Chan WM, Hjelm M. Teledermatology in Hong Kong: a cost-effective method to provide service to the elderly patients living in institutions. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:774–778. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00034.x.
    1. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Evans C, Hicks N, Jacklin P, Lotery HE, Mathews C, Paisley J. et al.A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7:108–118. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936246.
    1. Kunkler IH, Prescott RJ, Lee RJ, Brebner JA, Cairns JA, Fielding RG, Bowman A, Neades G, Walls AD, Chetty U. et al.TELEMAM: a cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision making. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:2506–2514. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.026.
    1. Noble SM, Coast J, Benger JR. A cost-consequences analysis of minor injuries telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:15–19. doi: 10.1258/1357633053430421.
    1. Bishai DM, Ferris DG, Litaker MS. What is the least costly strategy to evaluate cervical abnormalities in rural women? Comparing telemedicine, local practitioners, and expert physicians. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:463–470. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03260136.
    1. Mielonen ML, Ohinmaa A, Moring J, Isohanni M. Psychiatric inpatient care planning via telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:152–157. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935248.
    1. Wong HT, Poon WS, Jacobs P, Goh KY, Leung CH, Lau FL, Kwok S, Ng S, Chow L. The comparative impact of video consultation on emergency neurosurgical referrals. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:607–613. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000228926.13395.F9. discussion 607-613.
    1. Doolittle GC, Williams AR, Cook DJ. An estimation of costs of a pediatric telemedicine practice in public schools. Medical Care. 2003;41:100–109. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00012.
    1. Grady BJ. A comparative cost analysis of an integrated military telemental health-care service. Telemed J E Health. 2002;8:293–300. doi: 10.1089/15305620260353180.
    1. Scuffham PA, Steed M. An economic evaluation of the Highlands and Islands teledentistry project. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2002;8:165–177. doi: 10.1258/135763302320118915.
    1. Smith AC, Scuffham P, Wootton R. The costs and potential savings of a novel telepaediatric service in Queensland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-35.
    1. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health. 2001;7:293–316. doi: 10.1089/15305620152814700.
    1. Rojas SV, Gagnon MP. A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:896–904. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0009.
    1. Dowie R, Mistry H, Young TA, Weatherburn GC, Gardiner HM, Rigby M, Rowlinson GV, Franklin RC. Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: economic evaluation of a service in English hospitals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:116–125. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051653.
    1. Modai I, Jabarin M, Kurs R, Barak P, Hanan I, Kitain L. Cost effectiveness, safety, and satisfaction with video telepsychiatry versus face-to-face care in ambulatory settings. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12:515–520. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.515.
    1. O'Reilly R, Bishop J, Maddox K, Hutchinson L, Fisman M, Takhar J. Is telepsychiatry equivalent to face-to-face psychiatry? Results from a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:836–843. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.836.
    1. Oakley AM, Kerr P, Duffill M, Rademaker M, Fleischl P, Bradford N, Mills C. Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology--a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:97–101. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935112.
    1. Rendina MC, Long WA, DeBliek R. Effect size and experimental power analysis in a paediatric cardiology telemedicine system. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 1997;3:56–57. doi: 10.1258/1357633971930382.
    1. Ehlers L, Muskens WM, Jensen LG, Kjolby M, Andersen G. National use of thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine in Denmark: a model of budgetary impact and cost effectiveness. CNS Drugs. 2008;22:73–81. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822010-00006.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir