Estimation of salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, calcium, total protein content and total antioxidant capacity in relation to dental caries severity, age and gender

Pallavi Pandey, N Venugopal Reddy, V Arun Prasad Rao, Aditya Saxena, C P Chaudhary, Pallavi Pandey, N Venugopal Reddy, V Arun Prasad Rao, Aditya Saxena, C P Chaudhary

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, calcium, total protein content and total antioxidant capacity in relation to dental caries, age and gender.

Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 120 healthy children aged 7-15 years that was further divided into two groups: 7-10 years and 11-15 years. In this 60 children with DMFS/dfs = 0 and 60 children with DMFS/dfs ≥5 were included. The subjects were divided into two groups; Group A: Children with DMFS/dfs = 0 (caries-free) Group B: Children with DMFS/dfs ≥5 (caries active). Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from all groups. Flow rates were determined, and samples analyzed for pH, buffer capacity, calcium, total protein and total antioxidant status. Salivary antioxidant activity is measured with spectrophotometer by an adaptation of 2,2'-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) assays.

Results: The mean difference of the two groups; caries-free and caries active were proved to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) for salivary calcium, total protein and total antioxidant level for both the sexes in the age group 7-10 years and for the age 11-15 years the mean difference of the two groups were proved to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) for salivary calcium level for both the sexes. Salivary total protein and total antioxidant level were proved to be statistically significant for male children only.

Conclusions: In general, total protein and total antioxidants in saliva were increased with caries activity. Calcium content of saliva was found to be more in caries-free group and increased with age.

Keywords: Antioxidant; dental caries; saliva.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Saliva sample collection
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measuring pH
Figure 3
Figure 3
Measuring calcium
Figure 4
Figure 4
Measuring total protein

References

    1. Battino M, Ferreiro MS, Gallardo I, Newman HN, Bullon P. The antioxidant capacity of saliva. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:189–94.
    1. Dowd FJ. Saliva and dental caries. Dent Clin North Am. 1999;43:579–97.
    1. Lamey PJ, Lewis MA. Oral medicine in practice: Salivary gland disease. Br Dent J. 1990;168:237–43.
    1. Tulunoglu O, Demirtas S, Tulunoglu I. Total antioxidant levels of saliva in children related to caries, age, and gender. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16:186–91.
    1. Dawes C. Physiological factors affecting salivary flow rate, oral sugar clearance, and the sensation of dry mouth in man. J Dent Res. 1987;66:648–53.
    1. Stookey GK. The effect of saliva on dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:272–85.
    1. Kaufman E, Lamster IB. The diagnostic applications of saliva - A review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13:197–212.
    1. Mandel ID. The diagnostic uses of saliva. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19:119–25.
    1. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Measuring salivary flow challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:309–26.
    1. Dawes C. Salivary flow patterns and the health of hard and soft oral tissues. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:172–90.
    1. Moritsuka M, Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Ikeda M, Tagami J. The pH change after HCl titration into resting and stimulated saliva for a buffering capacity test. Aust Dent J. 2006;51:170–4.
    1. Neil JG. J Oral Pathol Med. 4th ed. 1978. The Physiology and Biochemistry of the Mouth; pp. 284–359.
    1. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Stacey M, Huq L, Reynolds EC, Tagami J. Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:140–4.
    1. Karshan M, Rosebury T, Waugh LM. Factors in Saliva Correlated with Dental Caries. Am J Dis Child. 1939;57:1026.
    1. Helmerhorst EJ, Oppenheim FG. Saliva: A dynamic proteome. J Dent Res. 2007;86:680–93.
    1. Schlesier K, Harwat M, Böhm V, Bitsch R. Assessment of antioxidant activity by using different in vitro methods. Free Radic Res. 2002;36:177–87.
    1. Koracevic D, Koracevic G, Djordjevic V, Andrejevic S, Cosic V. Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:356–61.
    1. Carnelio S, Khan SA, Rodrigues G. Definite, probable or dubious: Antioxidant triology in clinical dentistry. Br Dent J. 2008:204.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir