EEGNET: An Open Source Tool for Analyzing and Visualizing M/EEG Connectome

Mahmoud Hassan, Mohamad Shamas, Mohamad Khalil, Wassim El Falou, Fabrice Wendling, Mahmoud Hassan, Mohamad Shamas, Mohamad Khalil, Wassim El Falou, Fabrice Wendling

Abstract

The brain is a large-scale complex network often referred to as the "connectome". Exploring the dynamic behavior of the connectome is a challenging issue as both excellent time and space resolution is required. In this context Magneto/Electroencephalography (M/EEG) are effective neuroimaging techniques allowing for analysis of the dynamics of functional brain networks at scalp level and/or at reconstructed sources. However, a tool that can cover all the processing steps of identifying brain networks from M/EEG data is still missing. In this paper, we report a novel software package, called EEGNET, running under MATLAB (Math works, inc), and allowing for analysis and visualization of functional brain networks from M/EEG recordings. EEGNET is developed to analyze networks either at the level of scalp electrodes or at the level of reconstructed cortical sources. It includes i) Basic steps in preprocessing M/EEG signals, ii) the solution of the inverse problem to localize / reconstruct the cortical sources, iii) the computation of functional connectivity among signals collected at surface electrodes or/and time courses of reconstructed sources and iv) the computation of the network measures based on graph theory analysis. EEGNET is the unique tool that combines the M/EEG functional connectivity analysis and the computation of network measures derived from the graph theory. The first version of EEGNET is easy to use, flexible and user friendly. EEGNET is an open source tool and can be freely downloaded from this webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/eegnetworks/.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Basic workflow of EEGNET.
Fig 1. Basic workflow of EEGNET.
The M/EEG data are imported (256 dense EEG signals is this example). The functional connectivity is then computed directly between the scalp signals. Network measures can be extracted from the adjacency matrix and the scalp network can be visualized in an interactive way. On the other hand, the original M/EEG data can be used to estimate the brain sources by solving the inverse problem. Functional connectivity measures can be applied on the reconstructed sources. Graph measures can also be computed and the correspondent cortex network can be visualized. Node’s size and color can be used to encode any chosen network measures (their strength for instance) as well as the edges (their weight for instance).
Fig 2. Scalp networks.
Fig 2. Scalp networks.
A) The different steps performed to obtain a ‘static’ scalp network, B) typical example of the dynamics of scalp networks obtained during a picture naming task (see [47] for about the data). The node color represents the modules and the size represents the strength values.
Fig 3. Example of the nodes visualization…
Fig 3. Example of the nodes visualization control.
A. All nodes are showed with and without thresholding (about 1000 ROIs). Node’s color represents the module and nod’s size represents the strength values. B. The left view of the same network with the corresponding Desikan Atlas imported from scout file.
Fig 4. Example of the edges visualization…
Fig 4. Example of the edges visualization control.
A. Edge’s color represents strength values B. Multiview option (5 views) selected from the control panel (bottom).
Fig 5. An example of the quantification…
Fig 5. An example of the quantification analysis.
The strength measure is selected. The strength values for each ROIs in the left (L) and right (R) hemispheres are showed. The labels of the ROIs are used from the already loaded scout file.
Fig 6. Identification of brain networks involved…
Fig 6. Identification of brain networks involved in picture naming task.
A. The signals were loaded to EEGNET and the averaged signal over trials was visualized. The connectivity measure was chosen (PLV in this case) and the frequency bands were set to 30–45Hz (Low Gamma band). B. The network obtained at scalp level in the period 120–150ms. C. The network obtained at the same period after source reconstruction using wMNE and connectivity measurement (using PLV). D. The degree value of each nodes (based on Destrieux Atlas) was computed and visualized. E. The network obtained at 190–320ms after source reconstruction using wMNE and connectivity measurement (using PLV) and F. the corresponding degree values. Node’s color and size represent the modularity and the degree respectively. The time periods were chosen based on automatic segmentation of such cognitive task [47, 74].

References

    1. Bartolomei F, Bosma I, Klein M, Baayen JC, Reijneveld JC, Postma TJ, et al. How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study. Annals of neurology. 2006;59(1):128–38.
    1. Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Renault B, Varela FJ. Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature. 1999;397(6718):430–3.
    1. Hassan M, Dufor O, Merlet I, Berrou C, Wendling F. EEG Source Connectivity Analysis: From Dense Array Recordings to Brain Networks. PloS one. 2014;9(8):e105041 10.1371/journal.pone.0105041
    1. Schoffelen JM, Gross J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Human brain mapping. 2009;30(6):1857–65. 10.1002/hbm.20745
    1. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10(3):186–98. 10.1038/nrn2575
    1. Bassett DS, Bullmore E. Small-world brain networks. The neuroscientist. 2006;12(6):512–23.
    1. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E. A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. The Journal of neuroscience. 2006;26(1):63–72.
    1. Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore ET. Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2010;4.
    1. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Carlson JM, Grafton ST. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(18):7641–6.
    1. Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey CJ, Wedeen VJ, et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS biology. 2008;6(7):e159 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159
    1. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. The Journal of neuroscience. 2011;31(44):15775–86. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011
    1. Bressler SL, Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2010;14(6):277–90. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004
    1. Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2015;16(3):159–72. 10.1038/nrn3901
    1. Gong G, Rosa-Neto P, Carbonell F, Chen ZJ, He Y, Evans AC. Age-and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. The Journal of neuroscience. 2009;29(50):15684–93. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-09.2009
    1. Meunier D, Achard S, Morcom A, Bullmore E. Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks. Neuroimage. 2009;44(3):715–23. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.062
    1. Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Aging and functional brain networks. Molecular psychiatry. 2012;17(5):549–58.
    1. Stam C, Jones B, Nolte G, Breakspear M, Scheltens P. Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. Cerebral cortex. 2007;17(1):92–9.
    1. He Y, Chen Z, Evans A. Structural insights into aberrant topological patterns of large-scale cortical networks in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of neuroscience. 2008;28(18):4756–66. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0141-08.2008
    1. Lo C-Y, Wang P-N, Chou K-H, Wang J, He Y, Lin C-P. Diffusion tensor tractography reveals abnormal topological organization in structural cortical networks in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30(50):16876–85. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4136-10.2010
    1. Mallio CA, Schmidt R, Reus MA, Vernieri F, Quintiliani L, Curcio G, et al. Epicentral Disruption of Structural Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2015.
    1. Liao W, Zhang Z, Pan Z, Mantini D, Ding J, Duan X, et al. Altered functional connectivity and small-world in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. PloS one. 2010;5(1):e8525 10.1371/journal.pone.0008525
    1. Zhang Z, Liao W, Chen H, Mantini D, Ding J-R, Xu Q, et al. Altered functional–structural coupling of large-scale brain networks in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Brain. 2011;134(10):2912–28.
    1. Ponten S, Bartolomei F, Stam C. Small-world networks and epilepsy: graph theoretical analysis of intracerebrally recorded mesial temporal lobe seizures. Clinical neurophysiology. 2007;118(4):918–27.
    1. Liu Y, Liang M, Zhou Y, He Y, Hao Y, Song M, et al. Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. Brain. 2008;131(4):945–61.
    1. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O, Collin G, Scheewe T, Mandl RC, Cahn W, et al. Abnormal rich club organization and functional brain dynamics in schizophrenia. JAMA psychiatry. 2013;70(8):783–92. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1328
    1. Guye M, Bettus G, Bartolomei F, Cozzone PJ. Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional connectivity MRI in normal and pathological brain networks. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine. 2010;23(5–6):409–21.
    1. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2004;134(1):9–21.
    1. Brunet D, Murray MM, Michel CM. Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2011;2011:2.
    1. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2010;2011 10.1155/2011/156869
    1. Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Pantazis D, Leahy RM. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2011;2011:8.
    1. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010;52(3):1059–69. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
    1. Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68910 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910
    1. Seth AK. A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2010;186(2):262–73. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.020
    1. Daducci A, Gerhard S, Griffa A, Lemkaddem A, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, et al. The connectome mapper: an open-source processing pipeline to map connectomes with MRI. PloS one. 2012;7(12):e48121 10.1371/journal.pone.0048121
    1. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM. 2009;8:361–2.
    1. Gerhard S, Daducci A, Lemkaddem A, Meuli R, Thiran J-P, Hagmann P. The connectome viewer toolkit: an open source framework to manage, analyze, and visualize connectomes. Frontiers in neuroinformatics. 2011;5.
    1. He B, Dai Y, Astolfi L, Babiloni F, Yuan H, Yang L. eConnectome: A MATLAB toolbox for mapping and imaging of brain functional connectivity. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2011;195(2):261–9. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.11.015
    1. LaPlante RA, Douw L, Tang W, Stufflebeam SM. The Connectome Visualization Utility: Software for Visualization of Human Brain Networks. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e113838 10.1371/journal.pone.0113838
    1. Kruschwitz J, List D, Waller L, Rubinov M, Walter H. GraphVar: A user-friendly toolbox for comprehensive graph analyses of functional brain connectivity. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2015;245:107–15. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.021
    1. Li X, Yao X, Fox J, Jefferys JG. Interaction dynamics of neuronal oscillations analysed using wavelet transforms. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2007;160(1):178–85.
    1. Hassan M, Terrien J, Karlsson B, Marque C. Application of wavelet coherence to the detection of uterine electrical activity synchronization in labor. Irbm. 2010;31(3):182–7.
    1. Torrence C, Compo GP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological society. 1998;79(1):61–78.
    1. Wendling F, Ansari-Asl K, Bartolomei F, Senhadji L. From EEG signals to brain connectivity: a model-based evaluation of interdependence measures. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2009;183(1):9–18. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.04.021
    1. Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human brain mapping. 1999;8(4):194–208.
    1. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):968–80.
    1. Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. NeuroImage. 2010;53(1):1–15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010
    1. Mheich A, Hassan M, Khalil M, Berrou C, Wendling F. A new algorithm for spatiotemporal analysis of brain functional connectivity. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2015;242: 77–81. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.002
    1. Gramfort A, Papadopoulo T, Olivi E, Clerc M. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9(1):45.
    1. Becker H, Albera L, Comon P, Haardt M, Birot G, Wendling F, et al. EEG extended source localization: tensor-based vs. conventional methods. NeuroImage. 2014;96:143–57. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.043
    1. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi R. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Medical & biological engineering & computing. 1994;32(1):35–42.
    1. Engel AK, König P, Kreiter AK, Singer W. Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science. 1991;252(5010):1177–9.
    1. Müller MM, Gruber T. Induced gamma-band responses in the human EEG are related to attentional information processing. Visual Cognition. 2001;8(3–5):579–92.
    1. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Ohla K, Müller MM. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2009;21(1):42–57. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21004
    1. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):774–81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021
    1. Barlow JS, Brazier MA. A note on a correlator for electroencephalographic work. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1954;6:321–5.
    1. Brazier MA, Casby JU. Crosscorrelation and autocorrelation studies of electroencephalographic potentials. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1952;4(2):201–11.
    1. Wendling F, Bartolomei F, Bellanger J, Chauvel P. Interpretation of interdependencies in epileptic signals using a macroscopic physiological model of the EEG. Clinical neurophysiology. 2001;112(7):1201–18.
    1. Pijn JP, da Silva FL. Propagation of electrical activity: nonlinear associations and time delays between EEG signals Basic Mechanisms of the EEG: Springer; 1993. p. 41–61.
    1. Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human brain mapping. 2007;28(11):1178–93.
    1. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clinical neurophysiology. 2004;115(10):2292–307.
    1. Maars NJ, Da Silva FHL. Propagation of seizure activity in kindled dogs. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1983;56(2):194–209.
    1. Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann DA, Strohmeier D, Brodbeck C, et al. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 2014;86:446–60. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027
    1. Zhou D, Thompson WK, Siegle G. MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2009;47(4):1590–607. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.089
    1. Wilke C, Worrell G, He B. Graph analysis of epileptogenic networks in human partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52(1):84–93. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02785.x
    1. Caparos M, Louis-Dorr V, Wendling F, Maillard L, Wolf D. Automatic lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy based on scalp EEG. Clinical neurophysiology. 2006;117(11):2414–23.
    1. Lu Y, Yang L, Worrell GA, He B. Seizure source imaging by means of FINE spatio-temporal dipole localization and directed transfer function in partial epilepsy patients. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012;123(7):1275–83. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.007
    1. Dai Y, Zhang W, Dickens DL, He B. Source connectivity analysis from MEG and its application to epilepsy source localization. Brain topography. 2012;25(2):157–66. 10.1007/s10548-011-0211-0
    1. He B, Yang L, Wilke C, Yuan H. Electrophysiological imaging of brain activity and connectivity—challenges and opportunities. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2011;58(7):1918–31.
    1. Jung T-P, Humphries C, Lee T-W, Makeig S, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, et al. Extended ICA removes artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings. Advances in neural information processing systems. 1998:894–900.
    1. Scherg M, Ebersole J. Models of brain sources. Brain topography. 1993;5(4):419–23.
    1. Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, Fawcett IP, Singh KD. Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images. Human brain mapping. 2004;23(2):120–7.
    1. Amblard C, Lapalme E, Lina J-M. Biomagnetic source detection by maximum entropy and graphical models. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2004;51(3):427–42.
    1. Chowdhury RA, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C. MEG source localization of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: comparing entropic and hierarchical Bayesian approaches. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e55969 10.1371/journal.pone.0055969
    1. Mheich A, Hassan M, Dufor O, Khalil M, Berrou C, Wendling F, editors. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Brain Functional Connectivity. 6th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering; 2015: Springer.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir