A Case for Using Electronic Health Record Data in the Evaluation of Produce Prescription Programs

Ronit A Ridberg, Amy L Yaroch, Nadine Budd Nugent, Carmen Byker Shanks, Hilary Seligman, Ronit A Ridberg, Amy L Yaroch, Nadine Budd Nugent, Carmen Byker Shanks, Hilary Seligman

Abstract

Produce prescription programs within clinical care settings can address food insecurity by offering financial incentives through "prescriptions" for fruits and vegetables to eligible patients. The electronic health record (EHR) holds potential as a strategy to examine the relationship between these projects and participant outcomes, but no studies address EHR extraction for programmatic evaluations. We interviewed representatives of 9 grantees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Grant Program's Produce Prescription Projects (GusNIP PPR) to understand their experiences with and capacity for utilizing EHR for evaluation. Five grantees planned to use EHR data, with 3 main strategies: reporting aggregate data from health clinics, contracting with external/third party evaluators, and accessing individual-level data. However, utilizing EHRs was prohibitive for others due to insufficient knowledge, training and/or staff capacity; lack of familiarity with the Institutional Review Board process; or was inappropriate for select target populations. Policy support for produce prescription programs requires a robust evidence base, deep knowledge of best practices, and an understanding of expected health outcomes. These insights can be most efficiently and meaningfully achieved with EHR data, which will require increased financial support and technical assistance for project operators.

Keywords: GusNIP; electronic health record; food insecurity; food is medicine; produce prescription.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: All authors received grant funding through Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Grant Program grant no. 2019-70030-30415/project accession no. 1020863 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. RR was previously employed as an independent consultant to the Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition under the same funding grant.

References

    1. Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt MP, Gregory CA, Singh A. Household Food Security in the United States in 2019. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2020:1-57. Accessed February 18, 2021.
    1. Gottlieb L, Sandel M, Adler NE. Collecting and applying data on social determinants of health in health care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(11):1017-1020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.560
    1. Lundeen EA, Siegel KR, Calhoun H, et al.. Clinical-community partnerships to identify patients with food insecurity and address food needs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:E113. doi:10.5888/pcd14.170343
    1. Veldheer S, Scartozzi C, Knehans A, et al.. A systematic scoping review of how healthcare organizations are facilitating access to fruits and vegetables in their patient populations. J Nutr. 2020;150(11):2859-2873. doi:10.1093/jn/nxaa209
    1. Elena Rodriguez M, Christa D, Rochelle B, Babaian A, Daniel R. Produce prescription programs US field scan report: 2010-2020. 2021. Accessed April 20, 2022.
    1. Oronce CI, Miake-Lye IM, Begashaw MM, Booth M, Shrank WH, Shekelle PG. Interventions to address food insecurity among adults in Canada and the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(8):e212001. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2001
    1. Bhat S, Coyle DH, Trieu K, et al.. Healthy food prescription programs and their impact on dietary behavior and cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:1944-1956. doi:10.1093/advances/nmab039
    1. Haslam A, Gill J, Taniguchi T, Love C, Jernigan VB. The effect of food prescription programs on chronic disease management in primarily low-income populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Health. Published online February 2, 2022. doi:10.1177/02601060211070718
    1. Conaway KM. H.R.2 - Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018. 2018. Accessed April 21, 2021.
    1. Ehrenstein V, Kharrazi H, Lehmann H, Taylor CO. Obtaining data from electronic health records. In: Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Dreyer NA, eds. Tools and Technologies for Registry Interoperability, Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. 3rd ed. Addendum 2 [Internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019. Accessed May 18, 2022.
    1. Xie J, Price A, Curran N, Østbye T. The impact of a produce prescription programme on healthy food purchasing and diabetes-related health outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24:3945-3955. doi:10.1017/S1368980021001828
    1. Cavanagh M, Jurkowski J, Bozlak C, Hastings J, Klein A. Veggie Rx: an outcome evaluation of a healthy food incentive programme. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(14):2636-2641. doi:10.1017/S1368980016002081
    1. Resource and Patient Management System (RPMS). An easy and integrated way to effectively manage resource and patient information. Accessed April 29, 2022.
    1. Berkowitz SA, Delahanty LM, Terranova J, et al.. Medically tailored meal delivery for diabetes patients with food insecurity: a randomized cross-over trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(3):396-404. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4716-z
    1. Franz C, Atwood S, Orav EJ, et al.. Community-based outreach associated with increased health utilization among Navajo individuals living with diabetes: a matched cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):460. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05231-4

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir