Microvascular adaptations to resistance training are independent of load in resistance-trained young men

Tanya M Holloway, Robert W Morton, Sara Y Oikawa, Sean McKellar, Steven K Baker, Stuart M Phillips, Tanya M Holloway, Robert W Morton, Sara Y Oikawa, Sean McKellar, Steven K Baker, Stuart M Phillips

Abstract

Resistance training promotes microvasculature expansion; however, it remains unknown how different resistance training programs contribute to angiogenesis. Thus, we recruited experienced resistance-trained participants and determined the effect of 12 wk of either high-repetition/low-load or low-repetition/high-load resistance training performed to volitional fatigue on muscle microvasculature. Twenty men performed either a high-repetition [20-25 repetitions, 30-50% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM); n = 10] or a low-repetition (8-12 repetitions, 75-90% of 1RM; n = 10) resistance training program. Muscle biopsies were taken before and after resistance training, and immunohistochemistry was used to assess fiber type (I and II)-specific microvascular variables. High-repetition/low-load and low-repetition/high-load groups were not different in any variable before resistance training. Both protocols resulted in an increase in capillarization. Specifically, after resistance training, the capillary-to-fiber ratio, capillary contacts, and capillary-to-fiber perimeter exchange index were elevated, and sharing factor was reduced. These data demonstrate that resistance training performed to volitional failure, using either high repetition/low load or low repetition/high load, induced similar microvascular adaptations in recreationally resistance-trained young men.

Keywords: capillary; health; resistance training; skeletal muscle.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Representative images of muscle fiber type-specific analyses. A: laminin (blue). B: myosin heavy chain (MHC)-I (green). C: CD31 (red); D: MHC-I (green) + laminin (blue) + CD31 (red). “x” depicts the same fiber followed throughout. Color enhancement of different channels has been performed for visual clarity (i.e., after recording and analysis).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Fiber type-specific capillary-fiber index ratio (C/Fi; A and B), capillary contacts (CC; D and E), and capillary-fiber perimeter exchange (CFPE) index (G and H) before (Pre) and after (Post) 12 wk of high-repetition/low-load (n = 10 men) or low-repetition/high-load (n = 10) resistance training and individual percent change in C/Fi (C), CC (F), and CFPE index (I) after training in type I and II fibers. C/Fi, CC, and CFPE were significantly elevated as a result of both training programs. Data are presented as medians (lines) with interquartile ranges (boxes) ± range (minimum and maximum), where + indicates the mean. *Significant main effect of time (P < 0.02) from baseline. †Significantly different from high repetition/low load.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; A) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS; B) before (Pre) and after (Post) 12 wk of high-repetition/low-load (n = 10) or low-repetition/high-load (n = 10) resistance training. A: 12 wk of both high-repetition/low-load and low-repetition/high-load resistance training resulted in significant increase in VEGF protein in whole muscle homogenate. B: 12 wk of both high-repetition/low-load and low-repetition/high-load resistance training resulted in significant increase in eNOS protein in whole muscle homogenate. C: representative blots. Data are presented as medians (lines) with interquartile ranges (boxes) ± range (minimum and maximum), where + indicates the mean. *Significant main effect of time (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Mitochondrial content of whole muscle homogenate before (Pre) and after (Post) 12 wk of high-repetition/low-load (n = 10) or low-repetition/high-load (n = 10) resistance training. AD: 12 wk of both high-repetition/low-load and low-repetition/high-load resistance training resulted in no change in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) protein contents. E: representative blot. Data are presented as medians (lines) with interquartile ranges (boxes) ± range (minimum and maximum), where + indicates the mean.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir