Importance of authorship and inappropriate authorship assignment in paediatric research in low- and middle-income countries

Chris A Rees, Elizabeth M Keating, Kirk A Dearden, Heather Haq, Jeff A Robison, Peter N Kazembe, Florence T Bourgeois, Michelle Niescierenko, Chris A Rees, Elizabeth M Keating, Kirk A Dearden, Heather Haq, Jeff A Robison, Peter N Kazembe, Florence T Bourgeois, Michelle Niescierenko

Abstract

Objective: To understand the importance of authorship and authorship position, and gauge perceptions of inappropriate authorship assignment, among authors publishing paediatric research conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study using an online survey of both corresponding and randomly selected, non-corresponding authors who published research conducted in LMICs from 2006 to 2015 in the top four paediatric journals by Eigenfactor score. We used chi-square tests to compare responses by authors living in LMICs to authors living in high-income countries (HICs). We analysed qualitative responses using thematic analysis.

Results: Of 1420 potential respondents, 19.6% (n = 279) completed the survey. 57% (n = 159) lived in LMICs and 43% (n = 120) in HICs. LMIC authors more commonly perceived first authorship as most important for their academic advancement than HIC authors (74.2% vs. 60.8%, P = 0.017), while HIC authors reported last authorship as most important (25.1% vs. 38.3%, P = 0.018). 65% (n = 181) of respondents believed that their collaborators had been inappropriately assigned authorship positions (no difference in LMIC and HIC responses) and 32.6% (n = 91) reported personally accepting inappropriate authorship positions (more common in HIC respondents, P = 0.005). In qualitative data, respondents questioned the applicability of standard authorship guidelines for collaborative research conducted in LMICs.

Conclusions: LMIC and HIC authors held different perceptions about the importance of authorship position. Reported inappropriate authorship assignment was common among both LMIC and HIC respondents. Alternatives to standard authorship criteria for research conducted in LMICs merit further studies.

Keywords: authorship; global health; paediatric; paternité d'auteur; perceptions; pédiatrie; santé globale.

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References

    1. Siriwardhana C. Promotion and reporting of research from resource-limited settings. Infect Dis Res Treat 2015: 8: 25-29.
    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009: 373: 1993-1995.
    1. Keiser J, Utzinger J, Tanner M, Singer BH. Representation of authors and editors from countries with different human development indexes in the leading literature on tropical medicine: survey of current evidence. BMJ 2004: 328: 1229-1232.
    1. Bukusi EA, Manabe YC, Zunt JR. Mentorship and ethics in global health: fostering scientific integrity and responsible conduct of research. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019: 100: 42-47.
    1. ICMJE. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals [Internet], 2015. (Available from: ) [17 May 2016].
    1. Zachariah R, Reid T, Van den Bergh R et al. Applying the ICMJE authorship criteria to operational research in low-income countries: the need to engage programme managers and policy makers. Trop Med Int Health 2013: 18: 1025-1028.
    1. The Cope Report. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers [Internet], 2003. (Available from: ) [17 May 2016].
    1. Walsh A, Brugha R, Byrne E. “The way the country has been carved up by researchers”: Ethics and power in north - south public health research. Int J Equity Health 2016: 15: 204.
    1. Hedt-Gauthier B, Airhihenbuwa CO, Bawah AA et al. Academic promotion policies and equity in global health collaborations. Lancet 2018: 392: 1607-1609.
    1. Jacobsen KH. Patterns of co-authorship in international epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Heal 2009: 63: 665-669.
    1. Aluede EE, Phillips J, Bleyer J, Jergesen HE, Coughlin R. Representation of developing countries in orthopaedic journals: a survey of four influential orthopaedic journals. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012: 470: 2313-2318.
    1. Pastrana T, Vallath N, Mastrojohn J et al. Disparities in the contribution of low- and middle-income countries to palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manag 2010: 39: 54-68.
    1. Chersich MF, Blaauw D, Dumbaugh M et al. Local and foreign authorship of maternal health interventional research in low- and middle-income countries: systematic mapping of publications 2000-2012. Glob Heal 2016: 12: 35.
    1. Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E et al. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open 2017: 7: e018467.
    1. World Bank. Country and Lending Groups [Internet], 2016. Available from: ) [10 January 2018].
    1. Eigenfactor.org.Ranking and mapping scientific knowledge [Internet], 2016. (Available from: ) [15 Jan 2016].
    1. Rees CA, Lukolyo H, Keating EM et al. Authorship in paediatric research conducted in low- and middle-income countries: parity or parasitism? Trop Med Int Heal 2017: 22: 1362-1370.
    1. . Random Integer Generator [Internet], 1998. (Available from: ) [14 Jan 2018].
    1. Al-Herz W, Haider H, Al-Bahhar M, Sadeq A. Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist? J Med Ethics 2014: 40: 346-348.
    1. Dawes J. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int J Mark Res 2008: 50: 61-77.
    1. REDCap. REDCap, [Internet]. (Available from: ) [14 Jan 2018].
    1. Patel V, Kim YR. Contribution of low- and middle-income countries to research published in leading general psychiatry journals, 2002-2004. Br J Psychiatry 2007: 190: 77-78.
    1. Smith E, Hunt M, Master Z et al. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Med Ethics 2014: 15: 42.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J et al. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis 2004: 189: 930-937.
    1. Nordling L. Kenyan doctors win landmark discrimination case. Nature, [Internet], 2014. (Available from: ) [18 Mar 2019].
    1. Breet E, Botha J, Horn L, Swartz L. Academic and scientific authorship practices: a survey among South African researchers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018: 13: 412-420.
    1. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis C. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 2011: 343: d6128.
    1. Dhingra D, Mishra D. Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India. Indian J Med Ethics 2014: 11: 104-107.
    1. Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jeroncic A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS ONE 2011: 6: e23477.
    1. Šupak-Smolčić V, Mlinarić A, Antončić D et al. ICMJE authorship criteria are not met in a substantial proportion of manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica. Biochem Med 2015: 25: 324-334.
    1. Hwang SS, Song HH, Baik JH et al. Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology 2003: 226: 16-23.
    1. Mayhew SH, Doherty J, Pitayarangsarit S. Developing health systems research capacities through north-south partnership: An evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Heal Res Policy Syst 2008: 6: 1-12.
    1. Kombe F, Anunobi EN, Tshifugula NP et al. Promoting research integrity in Africa: An African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward. Dev World Bioeth 2014: 14: 158-166.
    1. Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Evaluat Higher Educat 2008: 33: 301-14.
    1. Evans JR, Mathur A. The value of online surveys. Inter Res 2005: 15: 195-219.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir