Improving Pediatric Academic Global Health Collaborative Research and Agenda Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study

Chris A Rees, Elizabeth M Keating, Kirk A Dearden, Heather Haq, Jeff A Robison, Peter N Kazembe, Florence T Bourgeois, Michelle Niescierenko, Chris A Rees, Elizabeth M Keating, Kirk A Dearden, Heather Haq, Jeff A Robison, Peter N Kazembe, Florence T Bourgeois, Michelle Niescierenko

Abstract

Academic global health collaborations have the potential to improve joint understanding of health issues in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our objective was to elucidate perceptions of benefits and challenges of academic global health collaborations as well as areas for improving collaborative research conducted in LMICs. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study surveyed investigators' perceptions of benefits and challenges of pediatric academic global health collaborations. Authors of articles from four pediatric journals reporting pediatric research conducted in LMICs published between 2006 and 2015 were surveyed. Responses of LMIC investigators were compared with those of investigators in high-income countries (HICs). Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using a combined thematic and content analysis approach. Of 1,420 potential respondents, 252 (17.7%) responded to the survey. Collaborative research with investigators from other countries was perceived as beneficial by 88.5% of respondents (n = 223), although this perception was more common among HIC respondents (n = 110, 94.0%) than LMIC respondents (n = 113, 83.7%) (p = 0.014). Sixty-seven percent (n = 170) of respondents perceived that HIC investigators had set the research agenda in work conducted in a LMIC. Respondents identified several critical factors to improve academic global health collaborations, including research capacity building, communication, and early involvement of LMIC investigators with shared decision-making during study conception and grant writing. Pediatric academic global health collaboration was widely perceived as positive. However, despite calls for capacity building and locally generated research ideas, many respondents felt that HIC investigators set the research agenda for work conducted in LMICs. This study provides suggestions for improving collaboration among pediatric academicians globally.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: M. N. has been a paid consultant for both the World Bank and Avenir Analytics. Otherwise, the authors do not have any potential, perceived, or real conflicts of interest relating to this work.

References

    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, Wasserheit JN; Cons ortium of Universities for Global Health Executive Board , 2009. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 373: 1993–1995.
    1. Smith E, Hunt M, Master Z, 2014. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Med Ethics 15: 42.
    1. Denburg AE, Joffe S, Gupta S, Howard SC, Ribeiro RC, Antillon FA, Vasquez R, Sung L, 2012. Pediatric oncology research in low income countries: ethical concepts and challenges. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58: 492–497.
    1. Bull S, et al. 2015. Best practices for ethical sharing of individual-level health research data from low- and middle-income settings. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 10: 302–313.
    1. Gautier L, Sieleunou I, Kalolo A, 2018. Deconstructing the notion of “global health research partnerships” across northern and African contexts. BMC Med Ethics 19 (Suppl 1): 49.
    1. Dean L, Njelesani J, Smith H, Bates I, 2015. Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom-Africa capacity strengthening award scheme. Heal Res Policy Syst 13: 81.
    1. Syed SB, et al. 2012. Developed-developing country partnerships: benefits to developed countries? Global Health 8: 17.
    1. Chu KM, Jayaraman S, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G, 2014. Building research capacity in Africa : equity and global health collaborations. PLoS Med 11: e1001612.
    1. Thompson MJ, Huntington MK, Hunt DD, Pinsky LE, Brodie JJ, 2003. Educational effects of international health electives on U.S. and Canadian medical students and residents: a literature review. Acad Med 78: 342–347.
    1. Shiffman J, 2015. Correspondence global health as a field of power relations : a response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag 4: 497–499.
    1. Keiser J, Utzinger J, Tanner M, Singer BH, 2004. Representation of authors and editors from countries with different human development indexes in the leading literature on tropical medicine: survey of current evidence. BMJ 328: 1229–1232.
    1. Hedt-Gauthier BL, Riviello R, Nkurunziza T, Kateera F, 2019. Growing research in global surgery with an eye towards equity. Br J Surg 106: e151–e155.
    1. Hudspeth JC, Rabin TL, Dreifuss BA, Schaaf M, Lipnick MS, Russ CM, Autry AM, Pitt MB, Rowthorn V, 2019. Reconfiguring a one-way street: a position paper on why and how to improve equity in global physician training. Acad Med 94: 482–489.
    1. Crane JT, 2010. Unequal ‘partners’. AIDS, academia, and the rise of global health. Behemoth 3: 78–97.
    1. Sanghera B, 2016. Charitable giving and lay morality: understanding sympathy, moral evaluations and social positions. Sociol Rev 64: 294–311.
    1. Hedt-Gauthier B, et al. 2018. Academic promotion policies and equity in global health collaborations. Lancet 392: 1607–1609.
    1. Citrin D, et al. 2017. Power, potential, and pitfalls in global health academic partnerships: review and reflections on an approach in Nepal. Glob Health Action 10: 1367161.
    1. Walsh A, Brugha R, Byrne E, 2016. “The way the country has been carved up by researchers”: ethics and power in north–south public health research. Int J Equity Health 15: 204.
    1. Hedt-gauthier BL, Chilengi R, Jackson E, Michel C, Napua M, Odhiambo J, Bawah A; with input from the AHI PHIT Partnership Collaborative , 2017. Research capacity building integrated into PHIT projects : leveraging research and research funding to build national capacity. BMC Health Serv Res 17 (Suppl 3): 825.
    1. Evensen A, et al. 2017. Family medicine in Ethiopia : lessons from a global collaboration. J Am Board Fam Med 30: 670–677.
    1. Lavery JV, IJsselmuiden C, 2018. The Research Fairness Initiative: filling a critical gap in global research ethics. Gates Open Res 2: 58.
    1. Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) , 2013. Where There Is No Lawyer: Guidance for Fairer Contract Negotiation in Collaborative Research Partnerships. Available at: . Accessed June 5, 2019.
    1. World Conferences on Research Integrity , 2013. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. Available at: . Accessed June 5, 2019.
    1. Kelly E, Doyle V, Weakliam D, Schönemann Y, 2015. A rapid evidence review on the effectiveness of institutional health partnerships. Global Health 11: 48.
    1. , 2016. Ranking and Mapping Scientific Knowledge. Available at: . Accessed January 15, 2018.
    1. World Bank , 2016. Country and Lending Groups. Available at: . Accessed January 10, 2018.
    1. , 1998. Random Integer Generator. Available at: . Accessed 14 January 2018.
    1. REDCap , 2018. Available at: . Accessed January 14, 2018.
    1. Nulty DD, 2008. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Evaluat Higher Educat 33: 301–314.
    1. Evans JR, Mathur A, 2005. The value of online surveys. Inter Res 15: 195–219.
    1. Rees CA, Keating EM, Dearden KA, Haq H, Robison JA, Kazembe PN, Bourgeois FT, Niescierenko M, 2019. Importance of authorship and inappropriate authorship assignment in paediatric research in low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health 24: 1229–1242.
    1. Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, Garner P, 2017. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open 7: e018467.
    1. Virginia B, Clarke V, 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 77–101.
    1. Rees CA, Lukolyo H, Keating EM, Dearden KA, Luboga SA, Schutze GE, Kazembe PN, 2017. Authorship in paediatric research conducted in low- and middle-income countries: parity or parasitism? Trop Med Int Health 22: 1362–1370.
    1. Chersich MF, et al. 2016. Local and foreign authorship of maternal health interventional research in low- and middle-income countries: systematic mapping of publications 2000–2012. Global Health 12: 35.
    1. Rohra DK, 2011. Representation of less-developed countries in pharmacology journals : an online survey of corresponding authors. BMC Med Res Methodol 11: 60.
    1. Horton R, 2000. Public health north and south: bridging the information gap. Lancet 355: 2231–2236.
    1. Horton R, 2003. Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. Lancet 361: 712–713.
    1. Tutarel O, 2005. How international are leading general paediatric journals? Arch Dis Child 90: 816–817.
    1. Arora G, Russ C, Batra M, Butteris SM, Watts J, Pitt MB, 2017. Bidirectional exchange in global health: moving toward true global health partnership. Am J Trop Med Hyg 97: 6–9.
    1. Steenhoff AP, et al. 2017. Partnerships for global child health. Pediatrics 140: e20163823.
    1. Edejer TT, 1999. North-south research partnerships: the ethics of carrying out research in developing countries. BMJ 319: 438–441.
    1. Sheikh K, Bennett SC, El Jardali F, Gotsadze G, 2017. Privilege and inclusivity in shaping global health agendas. Health Policy Plan 32: 303–304.
    1. Vasquez EE, Hirsch JS, Giang le M, Parker RG, 2013. Rethinking health research capacity strengthening. Glob Public Health 8 (Suppl 1): 104–124.
    1. Davies J, Mullan Z, 2016. Research capacity in Africa-will the sun rise again? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4: 375.
    1. Fogarty International Center , 2015. Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI). Available at: . Accessed June 6, 2019.
    1. Fogarty International Center , 2015. AIDS International Training and Research Program (AITRP). Available at: . Accessed June 6, 2019.
    1. Alemayehu C, Mitchell G, Nikles J, 2018. Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 17: 37.
    1. Franzen SR, Chandler C, Enquselassie F, Siribaddana S, Atashili J, Angus B, Lang T, 2013. Understanding the investigators: a qualitative study investigating the barriers and enablers to the implementation of local investigator-initiated clinical trials in Ethiopia. BMJ Open 3: e003616.
    1. Fogarty International Center , 2019. Global Health Program for Fellows and Scholars. Available at: . Accessed October 6, 2019.
    1. Bennet S, Paina L, Ssengooba F, Waswa D, M’Imunya JM, 2013. The impact of Fogarty International Center research training programs on public health policy and program development in Kenya and Uganda. BMC Public Health 13: 770.
    1. Kempker RR, Tukvadze N, Sthreshley L, Sharling L, Comeau DL, Magee MJ, Del Rio C, Avaliani Z, Blumberg HM, 2018. The impact of a Fogarty International Center-supported tuberculosis research training program in the country of Georgia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 98: 1069–1074.
    1. Parker M, Kingori P, 2016. Good and bad research collaborations: researchers’ views on science and ethics in global health research. PLoS One 11: e0163579.
    1. Larkan F, Uduma O, Lawal SA, van Bavel B, 2016. Developing a framework for successful research partnerships in global health. Global Health 12: 17.
    1. TDR for Research on Diseases of Poverty , 2014. Seven Principles for Strengthening Research Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Simple Ideas in a Complex World. Available at: . Accessed July 15, 2019.
    1. USAID , 2019. Academic Partnerships. Available at: . Accessed July 15, 2019.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir