Decision-making for delivery location and quality of care among slum-dwellers: a qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India

May Sudhinaraset, Naomi Beyeler, Sandhya Barge, Nadia Diamond-Smith, May Sudhinaraset, Naomi Beyeler, Sandhya Barge, Nadia Diamond-Smith

Abstract

Background: In 2013, the Government of India launched the National Urban Health Mission (NUHM) in order to better address the health needs of urban populations, including the nearly 100 million living in slums. Maternal and neonatal health indicators remain poor in India. The objective of this study is to highlight the experiences of women, their husbands, and mothers-in-law related to maternal health services and delivery experiences.

Methods: In total, we conducted 80 in-depth interviews, including 40 with recent mothers, 20 with their husbands, and 20 with their mothers-in-law. Purposeful sampling was conducted in order to obtain differences across delivery experiences (facility vs. home), followed by their family members.

Results: Major factors that influence decision-making about where to seek care included household dynamics and joint-decision-making with families, financial barriers, and perceived quality of care. Women perceived that private facilities were higher quality compared to public facilities, but also more expensive. Disrespectful care, bribes in the facility, and payment challenges were common in this population.

Conclusions: A number of programmatic and policy recommendations are highlighted from this study. Future endeavors should include a greater focus on health education and public programs, including educating women on how to access programs, who is eligible, and how to obtain public funds. Families need to be educated on their rights and expectations in facilities. Future programs should consider the role of husbands and mothers-in-law in reproductive decision-making and support during deliveries. Triangulating information from multiple sources is important for future research efforts.

Keywords: Child health; Health providers; India; Maternal health; Quality of care; Social support; Urban health; Urbanization.

References

    1. Diamond-Smith N, Sudhinaraset M. Drivers of facility deliveries in Africa and Asia: regional analyses using the demographic and health surveys. Reprod. Health. 2015;12:6. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-6.
    1. Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. India’s Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality? PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Jul 31];8. Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.
    1. The World Bank. World Bank Data: Infant Mortality Rate [Internet]. Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.
    1. Key Indicators for Uttar Pradesh from NFHS-3 [Internet]. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); ICF Macro; Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.
    1. Kishor S, Gupta K. Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in India [Internet] Calverton: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); ICF Macro; 2009.
    1. Singh KK, Bloom SS, Tsui AO. Husbands’ reproductive health knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Uttar Pradesh, India. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1998;29:388–99. doi: 10.2307/172251.
    1. Essendi H, Mills S, Fotso J-C. Barriers to formal emergency obstetric care services’ utilization. J. Urban Health Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 2011;88(2):S356–69. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9481-1.
    1. World Urbanization Prospectives: The 2014 Revision, Highlights [Internet]. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2014. Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.
    1. Bruce SG, Blanchard AK, Gurav K, Roy A, Jayanna K, Mohan HL, et al. Preferences for infant delivery site among pregnant women and new mothers in Northern Karnataka, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0481-8.
    1. Medhi D. In Her Husband’s family: a newly Wed Woman’s expectations and Her New Family’s attitudes in rural Assam, India. J. Int. Womens Stud. 2013;4:107–16.
    1. Singh A, Ram F. Men’s Involvement during Pregnancy and Childbirth: Evidence from Rural Ahmadnagar, India. Popul. Rev. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Jul 31];48. Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.
    1. Blanchard AK, Bruce SG, Jayanna K, Gurav K, Mohan HL, Avery L, et al. An exploration of decision-making processes on infant delivery site from the perspective of pregnant women, New mothers, and their families in northern Karnataka, India. Matern. Child Health J. 2015;19:2074–80. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1720-3.
    1. Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod. Health. 2014;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71.
    1. Modugu HR, Kumar M, Kumar A, Millett C. State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1048. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1048.
    1. Gopalan SS, Varatharajan D. Addressing maternal healthcare through demand side financial incentives: experience of Janani Suraksha Yojana program in India. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012;12:319. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-319.
    1. Thind A, Mohani A, Banerjee K, Hagigi F. Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-29.
    1. Saikia N, Singh A. Does types of household affect maternal health? Evidence from India. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2009;41:329–53. doi: 10.1017/S0021932008003209.
    1. Bloom SS, Wypij D, Das GM. Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography. 2001;38:67–78. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0001.
    1. World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: . Accessed 5 July 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir