Development and manufacture of novel locally produced anti-BCMA CAR T cells for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from a phase I clinical trial

Nathalie Asherie, Shlomit Kfir-Erenfeld, Batia Avni, Miri Assayag, Tatyana Dubnikov, Nomi Zalcman, Eyal Lebel, Eran Zimran, Adir Shaulov, Marjorie Pick, Yael Cohen, Irit Avivi, Cyrille Cohen, Moshe E Gatt, Sigal Grisariu, Polina Stepensky, Nathalie Asherie, Shlomit Kfir-Erenfeld, Batia Avni, Miri Assayag, Tatyana Dubnikov, Nomi Zalcman, Eyal Lebel, Eran Zimran, Adir Shaulov, Marjorie Pick, Yael Cohen, Irit Avivi, Cyrille Cohen, Moshe E Gatt, Sigal Grisariu, Polina Stepensky

Abstract

Anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy shows remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). HBI0101, a novel second generation optimized anti- BCMA CAR T-cell therapy, was developed in an academic setting. We conducted a phase I dose-escalation study of HBI0101 (cohort 1: 150x106 CAR T cells, n=6; cohort 2: 450x106 CAR T cells, n=7; cohort 3: 800x106 CAR T cells, n=7) in 20 heavily pre-treated R/R MM patients. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 18 patients (90%). Neither grade 3-4 CRS nor neurotoxicity of any grade were observed. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in any cohort. The overall response rate (ORR), (stringent) complete response (CR/sCR), and very good partial response rates were 75%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Response rates were dose-dependent with 85% ORR, 71% CR, and 57% minimal residual disease negativity in the high-dose cohort 3. Across all cohorts, the median overall survival (OS) was 308 days (range 25-466+), with an estimated OS of 55% as of June 27th (data cut-off). The median progression-free survival was 160 days, with 6 subjects remaining progression free at the time of data cut-off. Our findings demonstrate the manageable safety profile and efficacy of HBI0101. These encouraging data support the decentralization of CAR T production in an academic setting, ensuring sufficient CAR T supply to satisfy the increasing local demand. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04720313.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Objective responses in patients treated with HBI0101 CAR T cells. (A) Overall response rate (ORR). The best responses for each patient are shown according to dose (150-, 450- and 800x106 CAR+ cells/dose). Disease response was determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) consensus criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is defined as the number of multiple myeloma (MM) plasma cells detected in the bone marrow per 1x105 total nucleated cells. An MRD of 1x10-5 or less is considered MRD-negative (MRD-). (B) Response to HBI0101 treatment. Swimmer's plot of best responses among individual MM patients are shown according to cell dose (150- to 800x106 CAR+). Response assessment according to IMWG criteria. Grey: progressive disease (PD) / stable disease (SD); green: very good partial response (VGPR); light blue: stringent complete response/complete response with MRD positive (sCR/CR [MRD+]); blue: stringent complete response/complete response with MRD negative (sCR/CR [MRD-]).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival of patients with relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma administered with HBI0101 CAR T cells. Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) in all the patients (A) or grouped according to dose (B), overall survival (OS) in all patients (C) or grouped according to dose (D).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Multiple myeloma disease monitoring. Free light chain levels were determined at the indicated time points prior to and following HBI0101 infusion in cohort 1 (N=6) (A), cohort 2 (N=6) (B), and cohort 3 (N=6) (C). Normal range for Kappa light chain: 6.7-22.4 mg/L, and Lambda light chain: 8.3-27 mg/L. (D) Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) levels prior to and following CAR T infusion were determined by ELISA in the "response" (blue squares) versus "no response" (black dots) groups.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Efficacy of HBI0101 CAR T-based therapy in eliminating CD38++CD138++ malignant plasma cells. (A) Flow cytometric gating strategy for the assessment of anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD56 expression on multiple myeloma plasma cells (MM-PC) (indicated by arrows). Samples were gated on CD38++CD138++. (B) Bone marrow (BM) samples prior to and one month (mth) following HBI0101-CAR T infusion were assessed for the presence of PC (as % of CD38++CD138++ cells) by flow cytometry by gating on white blood cells (WBC), as illustrated in (A). (C-E) Analysis of BCMA and CD56 expression on MM-PC, by "response" (blue squares) versus "no response" (black dots) group. (C, D) BCMA expression levels in MM patients (N=12). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (C) and the percent of BCMA-positive PC (D) were determined by flow cytometry. (E) Percent of CD56-positive PC in "response" (N=9) versus "no response" (N=3) groups.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Soluble anti-B-cell maturation antigen clearance and HBI0101 CAR T-cell in vivo kinetics. (A) The median number of HBI0101-CAR T cells per 1 mL blood in the "response" versus "no response" group was determined by quantification of CAR transgene levels by qRT-PCR method following CAR T infusion at the indicated times and further adjusted to the copy numbers per transduced cell at the day of CAR T infusion. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 500 CAR T/mL blood. (B) HBI0101 CAR T-cell overall expansion in the first month of CAR T therapy. Area under the curve (AUC) as a measure of CAR T-cell overall expansion was calculated with Prism software (GraphPad). (C) HBI0101 cells in vivo median concentration at peak (Cmax) in "response" (blue squares) versus "no response" (black dots) groups. (D) Median time to Cmax (Tmax) in "response" (blue squares) versus "no response" (black dots) groups. Upper and lower bars I represent the maximal and minimal values, respectively. (E, F) Soluble anti-B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels prior to and following HBI0101 infusion determined by ELISA and further normalized to sBCMA concentration at baseline (right y-axis; empty circles) versus HBI0101-cell expansion indicated by the CAR T/mL (left y-axis; filled circles) in the "no response" group (E), and in the "response" group (F). **P<0.01, by unpaired t test.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Effect of belantamab pre-treatment on multiple myeloma patients’ response to HBI0101 therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) (A) and overall survival (OS) (C) in "belantamab(+)" versus "belantamab(-)" group. (B, D) Effect of belantamab prior therapy on plasma cell anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expression. Percent of BCMA-expressing bone marrow-plasma cell (BM-PC) (B) and BCMA expression mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (D) on BM-PC were determined by flow cytometry prior to HBI0101 infusion and analyzed according to patient's pre-exposure to belantamab. Samples were gated on CD38++CD138++ cells. CR: complete response; sCR: stringent complete response; VGPR: very good partial response; MRD: minimal residual disease; ns: not significant.

References

    1. Cowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M, et al. . Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(5):464-477.
    1. Gay F, Larocca A, Wijermans P, et al. . Complete response correlates with long-term progression free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. Blood. 2011;117(11):3025-3031.
    1. Gandhi UH, Cornell RF, Lakshman A, et al. . Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy. Leukemia. 2019;33(9):2266-2275.
    1. Kumar SK, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, et al. . Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study. Leukemia. 2017;31(11):2443-2448.
    1. Pick M, Vainstein V, Goldschmidt N, et al. . Daratumumab resistance is frequent in advanced-stage multiple myeloma patients irrespective of CD38 expression and is related to dismal prognosis. Eur J Haematol. 2018;100(5):494-501.
    1. Gill SK, Unawane R, Wang S, et al. . Inferior outcomes of patients with quad and penta-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) compared to those of patients who have been quad and penta exposed. Blood. 2021;138 (Supplement 1):4742.
    1. Vogl DT, Dingli D, Cornell RF, et al. . Selective inhibition of nuclear export with oral selinexor for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(9):859-866.
    1. Guo R, Lu W, Zhang Y, Cao X, Jin X, Zhao M. Targeting BCMA to treat multiple myeloma: updates from the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting. Front Immunol. 2022;13:839097.
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, et al. . Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705-716.
    1. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. . Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314-324.
    1. Du J, Wei R, Jiang S, et al. . CAR-T cell therapy targeting B cell maturation antigen is effective for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including cases with poor performance status. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(7):933-941.
    1. Frigault MJ, Bishop MR, Rosenblatt J, et al. . Phase 1 study of CART-ddBCMA for the treatment of subjects with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2023;7(5):768-777.
    1. Harush O, Asherie N, Kfir-Erenfeld S, et al. . Preclinical evaluation and structural optimization of anti-BCMA CAR to target multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2022;107(10):2395-2407.
    1. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. . International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328-e346.
    1. Theunissen P, Mejstrikova E, Sedek L, et al. . Standardized flow cytometry for highly sensitive MRD measurements in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2017;129(3):347-357.
    1. Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, et al. . ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(4):625-638.
    1. Laurent SA, Hoffmann FS, Kuhn PH, et al. . Gamma-secretase directly sheds the survival receptor BCMA from plasma cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7333.
    1. Ghermezi M, Li M, Vardanyan S, et al. . Serum B-cell maturation antigen: a novel biomarker to predict outcomes for multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica. 2017;102(4):785-795.
    1. Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, et al. . Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1726-1737.
    1. Gazeau N, Beauvais D, Yakoub-Agha I, et al. . Effective anti-BCMA retreatment in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2021;5(15):3016-3020.
    1. Mu W, Long X, Cai H, et al. . A model perspective explanation of the long-term sustainability of a fully human BCMA-targeting CAR (CT103A) T-cell immunotherapy. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:803693.
    1. Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Dogan A, et al. . Serial treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with different BCMA-targeting therapies. Blood Adv. 2019;3(16):2487-2490.
    1. Montes de Oca R, Alavi AS, Vitali N, et al. . Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) drives immunogenic cell death and immune-mediated antitumor responses in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(10):1941-1955.
    1. Carpenter RO, Evbuomwan MO, Pittaluga S, et al. . B-cell maturation antigen is a promising target for adoptive T-cell therapy of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):2048-2060.
    1. Skerget M, Skopec B, Zadnik V, et al. . CD56 expression is an important prognostic factor in multiple myeloma even with bortezomib induction. Acta Haematol. 2018;139(4):228-234.
    1. Lebel E, Nachmias B, Pick M, Gross Even-Zohar N, Gatt ME. Understanding the bioactivity and prognostic implication of commonly used surface antigens in multiple myeloma. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):1809.
    1. Pellat-Deceunynck C, Barille S, Jego G, et al. . The absence of CD56 (NCAM) on malignant plasma cells is a hallmark of plasma cell leukemia and of a special subset of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 1998;12(12):1977-1982.
    1. Li G, Huang XJ, Niu T, et al. . [Expression of CD56 in multiple myeloma cells and its relationship with extramedullary disease and extramedullary relapse]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021;29(2):553-556.
    1. Chang H, Samiee S, Yi QL. Prognostic relevance of CD56 expression in multiple myeloma: a study including 107 cases treated with high-dose melphalan-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47(1):43-47.
    1. Hayden PJ, Sirait T, Koster L, Snowden JA, Yakoub-Agha I. An international survey on the management of patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy for haematological malignancies on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT. Curr Res Transl Med. 2019;67(3):79-88.
    1. Till BG, Jensen MC, Wang J, et al. . CD20-specific adoptive immunotherapy for lymphoma using a chimeric antigen receptor with both CD28 and 4-1BB domains: pilot clinical trial results. Blood. 2012;119(17):3940-3950.
    1. Prommersberger S, Reiser M, Beckmann J, et al. . CARAMBA: a first-in-human clinical trial with SLAMF7 CAR-T cells prepared by virus-free Sleeping Beauty gene transfer to treat multiple myeloma. Gene Ther. 2021;28(9):560-571.
    1. Kebriaei P, Singh H, Huls MH, et al. . Phase I trials using Sleeping Beauty to generate CD19-specific CAR T cells. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(9):3363-3376.
    1. Townsend MH, Bennion K, Robison RA, O'Neill KL. Paving the way towards universal treatment with allogenic T cells. Immunol Res. 2020;68(1):63-70.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir