Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005

Heather S Boon, Folashade Olatunde, Suzanna M Zick, Heather S Boon, Folashade Olatunde, Suzanna M Zick

Abstract

Background: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by women with breast cancer is often said to be increasing, yet few data exist to confirm this commonly held belief. The purpose of this paper is to compare overall patterns of CAM use, as well as use of specific products and therapies at two different points in time (1998 vs 2005) by women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Methods: Surveys were mailed to women randomly selected from the Ontario Cancer Registry (Canada) in the spring of 1998 (n = 557) and again in the spring of 2005(n = 877).

Results: The response rates were 76.3% in 1998 and 63% in 2005. In 1998, 66.7% of women reported using either a CAM product/therapy or seeing a CAM therapist at some time in their lives as compared with 81.9% in 2005 (p = 0.0002). Increases were seen in both use of CAM products/therapies (62% in 1998 vs. 70.6% in 2005) and visits to CAM practitioners (39.4% of respondents in 1998 vs 57.4% of respondents in 2005). Women in 2005 reported that 41% used CAM for treating their breast cancer. The most commonly used products and practitioners for treating breast cancer as reported in 2005 were green tea, vitamin E, flaxseed, vitamin C, massage therapists and dietitians/nutritionists.

Conclusion: CAM use (both self-medication with products and visits to CAM practitioners) increased significantly from 1998 to 2005. Now that more than 80% of all women with breast cancer report using CAM (41% in a specific attempt to management their breast cancer), CAM use can no longer be regarded as an "alternative" or unusual approach to managing breast cancer.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Derivation of the sample.

References

    1. Collyar D. Breast cancer: A global perspective. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1001s–105s.
    1. Mettlin C. Global breast cancer mortality statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;49:138–144.
    1. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada Canadian Cancer Statistics, 2005
    1. Crocetti E, Crotti N, Feltrin A, Ponton P, Geddes M, Buiatti E. The Use of Complementary Therapies by Breast Cancer Patients Attending Conventional Treatment. European Journal of Cancer. 1998;34:324–328. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10043-0.
    1. Rees R, Feigel I, Vickers A, Zollman C, McGurk R, Smith C. Prevalence of complementary therapy use by women with breast cancer: a population-based survey. European Journal of Cancer. 36:1359–1364. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00099-X.
    1. Moschen R, Kemmler G, Schweigkofler H, Holzner B, Dunser M, Richter R, et al. Use of alternative / complementary therapy in breast cancer patients - a psychological perspective. Support Care Cancer. 2001;9:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s005200000208.
    1. Burstein HJ, Gelber S, Guadagnoli E, Weeks JC. Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:1733–1759. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906033402206.
    1. Boon H, Stewart M, Kennard MA, Gray R, Sawka C, Brown JB, McWilliam C, Gavin A, Baron RA, Aaron D, Haines-Kamka T. The use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: Prevalence and perceptions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18:2515–2521.
    1. Balneaves LG, Bottorff JL, Hislop TG, Herbert Levels of Commitment: Exploring Complementary Therapy Use by Women with Breast Cancer. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2006;12:459–466. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.459.
    1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–1575. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569.
    1. Zick S, Sen A, Feng Y, Green J, Olatunde S, Boon H. Trial of Essiac to Ascertain its Effect in Women with Breast Cancer (TEA-BC) Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
    1. Astin JA, Marie A, Pelletier KR, Hansen E, Haskell WL. A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998;158:2303–2310. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.21.2303.
    1. Verhoef MJ, Page SA. Physicians' perspectives on massage therapy. Canadian Family Physician. 1998;44
    1. Lipman L, Dale J, MacPherson H. Attitudes of GPs towards the provision of acupuncture on the NHS. Complement Ther Med. 2003;11:110–114. doi: 10.1016/S0965-2299(03)00042-6.
    1. Berman B. Complementary and alternative medicine: Is it just a case of more tools for the medical bag? Clin J Pain. 2004;20:1–2. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00001.
    1. Diehl DL, Kaplan G, Coulter I, Glik D, Hurwitz EL. Use of acupuncture by American physicians. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine. 1997;3:103–104.
    1. Welsh S, Kelner MJ, Boon H, Wellman B. Moving Forward? Complementary and alternative practitioners seeking self-regulation. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2004;26:216–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00387.x.
    1. Boon H, Wong J. Botanical medicine and cancer: a review of the safety and efficacy. Expert Opinion. 2004;5:2485–2501. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.12.2485.
    1. Weiger W, Smith MJ, Boon H, Richardson MA, Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM. Advising patients who seek complementary and alternative medical therapies for cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137:889–903.
    1. Kaegi E. Unconventional therapies for cancer. 1. Essiac. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998;158:897–902.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir