Clinically distinguishing between appendicitis and right-sided colonic diverticulitis at initial presentation

Jun-Ho Shin, Byung-Ho Son, Hungdai Kim, Jun-Ho Shin, Byung-Ho Son, Hungdai Kim

Abstract

Purpose: Most patients diagnosed with right-sided colonic diverticulitis complain of right lower quadrant pain, which is frequently confused for appendicitis and therefore may result in unnecessary emergency surgery. In this paper we intend to differentiate between right-sided colonic diverticulitis and appendicitis by initial presentation in the emergency department.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 450 patients between January 1997 and July 2003. Among these patients, 92 with right-sided colonic diverticulitis were classified as group I; 268 patients with simple appendicitis were classified as group II; and 90 patients with perforated appendicitis were classified as group III.

Results: Prodromal symptoms were less common in group I (p < 0.05) than in the other groups. In comparing the location of maximal tenderness among groups, 19.6% of group I patients complained of maximal tenderness at a point lateral to McBurney's point, a greater percentage than those in groups II and III (p=0.002). Group I experienced less leukocytosis (10,913.8/mm(3)) than did groups II (13,238.3/mm(3)) and III (15,589.3/mm(3)). The percentage of segmented forms in the differential counts was also smaller in group I (73.6%) than in groups II (79.1%) and III (81.8%). In addition, the proportion of lymphocytes was larger in group I (17.7%) than in groups II (13.9%) and III (9.3%).

Conclusion: Among patients complaining of right lower quadrant pain in an emergency setting, right-sided colonic diverticulitis must be considered in the following conditions to avoid unnecessary emergency operations: lack of prodromal symptoms, tenderness at a point lateral to McBurney's point, and absent or mild leukocytosis with a low fraction of segmented forms and a high fraction of lymphocytes in the CBC.

References

    1. Almy TP, Howell DA. Medical Progress. Diverticular disease of the colon. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:324–331.
    1. Sugihara K, Muto T, Morioka Y, Asano A, Yamamoto T. Diverticular disease of the colon in Japan. A review of 615 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:531–537.
    1. Kim JS, Cha SG, Kim YT, Yoon YB, Song IS, Choi KW, et al. The prevalence and clinical features of Diverticular disease of the colon. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1993;25:305–314.
    1. Graham SM, Ballantyne GH. Cecal diverticulitis. A review of the American experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:821–826.
    1. Lee KJ, Hyun TI. Clinical evaluation of colonic diverticular disease. J Korean Surg Soc. 1995;11:100–106.
    1. Arrington P, Judd CS., Jr Cecal diverticulitis. Am J Surg. 1981;142:56–59.
    1. Vignati PV, Welch JP, Cohen JL. Long term management of diverticulitis in young patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:627–629.
    1. Harada RN, Whelan TJ., Jr Surgical management of cecal diverticulitis. Am J Surg. 1993;166:666–671.
    1. Chung YL, Kin WC. Acute diverticulitis of the right colon. Am J Surg. 1996;171:244–246.
    1. Ngoi SS, Chia J, Goh MY, Sim E, Rauff A. Surgical management of right colon diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:799–802.
    1. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. Dietary fiber and disease. JAMA. 1974;229:1068–1074.
    1. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet. 1972;2:1408–1412.
    1. Hackford AW, Schoetz DJ, Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Surgical management of the complicated diverticulitis. The Lahey Clinic experience, 1967 to 1982. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:317–321.
    1. Poiter F. Diverticulite et appendicite. Bull Mem Soc Anat (Paris) 1912;137:29–33. (Cited from A.M.A Arch Surg 1961;83:436)
    1. Kim KY, Kim HS, Kim IH, Chun EC. Cecal diverticulitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 1968;10:249–252.
    1. Park CW, Kim BG, Kim KS, Byun YH, Cho KH, Byun SH, et al. Surgical management of cecal diverticulitis detected during appendectomy. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2001;17:15–19.
    1. Park JK, Sung JK, Choi SH, Yun SS, Lee S. Clinical analysis of right colon diverticulitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 2003;64:44–48.
    1. Cho HJ, Cho SY, Oh JH. Clinical analysis of right colonic diverticulitis that was operated under the impression of acute appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16:18–24.
    1. Painter NS. The cause of diverticular disease of the colon, its symptoms and its complication. Review and hypothesis. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985;30:118–122.
    1. Kim W, Lee DS, Suh YJ, Cho WI, Oh ST, Jin HM, et al. Cecal diverticulitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 1996;50:116–123.
    1. Lauridsen J, Ross FP. Acute diverticulitis of the cecum; a report of four cases and review of one hundred fifty-three surgical cases. AMA Arch Surg. 1952;64:320–330.
    1. Suh KW, Suh YJ, Choi JS, Yoo CH, Kim JH. Clinically differential diagnosis of cecal diverticulitis from appendicitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 1996;12:94–98.
    1. Sasso RD, Hanna EA, Moore DL. Leukocytic and neutrophilic counts in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 1970;120:563–566.
    1. Wagner DE, Zollinger RW. Diverticulitis of the cecum and ascending colon. Arch Surg. 1961;83:436–443.
    1. Chen SC, Chang KJ, Wei TC, Yu SC, Wang SM. Can cecal diverticulitis be differentiated from acute appendicitis? J Formos Med Assoc. 1994;93:263–265.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir