Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms

Jaewon Beom, Sukgyu Koh, Hyung Seok Nam, Wonshik Kim, Yoonjae Kim, Han Gil Seo, Byung-Mo Oh, Sun Gun Chung, Sungwan Kim, Jaewon Beom, Sukgyu Koh, Hyung Seok Nam, Wonshik Kim, Yoonjae Kim, Han Gil Seo, Byung-Mo Oh, Sun Gun Chung, Sungwan Kim

Abstract

Mirror therapy has been performed as effective occupational therapy in a clinical setting for functional recovery of a hemiplegic arm after stroke. It is conducted by eliciting an illusion through use of a mirror as if the hemiplegic arm is moving in real-time while moving the healthy arm. It can facilitate brain neuroplasticity through activation of the sensorimotor cortex. However, conventional mirror therapy has a critical limitation in that the hemiplegic arm is not actually moving. Thus, we developed a real-time 2-axis mirror robot system as a simple add-on module for conventional mirror therapy using a closed feedback mechanism, which enables real-time movement of the hemiplegic arm. We used 3 Attitude and Heading Reference System sensors, 2 brushless DC motors for elbow and wrist joints, and exoskeletal frames. In a feasibility study on 6 healthy subjects, robotic mirror therapy was safe and feasible. We further selected tasks useful for activities of daily living training through feedback from rehabilitation doctors. A chronic stroke patient showed improvement in the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale and elbow flexor spasticity after a 2-week application of the mirror robot system. Robotic mirror therapy may enhance proprioceptive input to the sensory cortex, which is considered to be important in neuroplasticity and functional recovery of hemiplegic arms. The mirror robot system presented herein can be easily developed and utilized effectively to advance occupational therapy.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5091873/bin/jove-114-54521-thumb.jpg

References

    1. Hamzei F, et al. Functional plasticity induced by mirror training: the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(5):484–496.
    1. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD008449.
    1. Dohle C, et al. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(3):209–217.
    1. Pervane Vural S, Nakipoglu Yuzer GF, Sezgin Ozcan D, Demir Ozbudak S, Ozgirgin N. Effects of Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1: A Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(4):575–581.
    1. De Santis D, et al. Robot-assisted training of the kinesthetic sense: enhancing proprioception after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;8:1037.
    1. Smorenburg AR, Ledebt A, Deconinck FJ, Savelsbergh GJ. Practicing a matching movement with a mirror in individuals with spastic hemiplegia. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(9):2507–2513.
    1. Semrau JA, Herter TM, Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(12):3414–3421.
    1. Niku S. Introduction to Robotics: Analysis, Systems, Applications. Prentice Hall; 2001. Chapter 4, Dynamic Analysis and Forces.
    1. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73(7):447–454.
    1. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206–207.
    1. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–709.
    1. Lo AC, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1772–1783.
    1. Ho NS, et al. An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: task training system for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011. p. 5975340.
    1. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(6):915–920.
    1. Lum PS, et al. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):631–642.
    1. Yang CL, Lin KC, Chen HC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Pilot comparative study of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted training on upper-extremity performance in patients with stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(2):198–206.
    1. Nef T, Mihelj M, Riener R. ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007;45(9):887–900.
    1. Ozkul F, Barkana DE, Demirbas SB, Inal S. Evaluation of proprioceptive sense of the elbow joint with RehabRoby. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011. p. 5975466.
    1. Pehlivan AU, Celik O, O'Malley MK. Mechanical design of a distal arm exoskeleton for stroke and spinal cord injury rehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011. p. 5975428.
    1. Zhang H, et al. Feasibility studies of robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation at clinic and home settings using RUPERT. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011. p. 5975440.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir