Predictors and mediators of outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain: the contributions of psychological flexibility

Sophia Åkerblom, Sean Perrin, Marcelo Rivano Fischer, Lance M McCracken, Sophia Åkerblom, Sean Perrin, Marcelo Rivano Fischer, Lance M McCracken

Abstract

There is now a consensus in the literature that future improvements in outcomes obtained from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain will require research to identify patient and treatment variables that help explain outcomes. The first aim of this study was to assess whether pre-treatment scores on measures of psychological (in)flexibility, acceptance, committed action, cognitive (de)fusion, and values-based action predict outcomes in a multidisciplinary, multicomponent, group-based CBT program for adults with chronic pain. The second aim was to assess whether change scores on these same measures mediate outcomes in the treatment program. Participants were 232 people attending treatment for chronic pain. Of the psychological flexibility measures, only pre-treatment scores on the psychological inflexibility scale predicted outcomes; higher scores on this measure were associated with worse outcomes. However, change scores on each of the psychological flexibility measures separately mediated outcomes. The efficacy of CBT for chronic pain may be improved with a greater focus on methods that increase psychological flexibility.

Keywords: Chronic pain; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Mediator; Predictor; Psychological flexibility.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Åkerblom S, Perrin S, Rivano Fischer M, McCracken LM. The mediating role of acceptance in multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Journal of Pain. 2015;16:606–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.007.
    1. Åkerblom S, Perrin S, Rivano Fischer M, McCracken LM. A validation and generality study of the committed action questionnaire in a Swedish sample with chronic pain. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2016;23:260–270. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9539-x.
    1. Åkerblom S, Perrin S, Rivano Fischer M, McCracken LM. Further validation of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory in a Swedish chronic pain sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2017;6:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.06.001.
    1. Baranoff J, Hanrahan SJ, Kapur D, Connor JP. Acceptance as a process variable in relation to catastrophizing in multidisciplinary pain treatment. European Journal of Pain. 2013;17:101–110. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00165.x.
    1. Barke A, Riecke J, Rief W, Glombiewski JA. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)—Validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015;16:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0641-z.
    1. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy. 2011;42:676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.
    1. Burns JW, Johnson BJ, Mahoney N, Devine J, Pawl R. Cognitive and physical capacity process variables predict long-term outcome after treatment of chronic pain. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;66:434–439. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.434.
    1. Burns JW, Kubilus A, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K. Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2003;71:81–91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.81.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
    1. DeRubeis RJ, Cohen ZD, Forand NR, Fournier JC, Gelfand LA, Lorenzo-Luaces L. The personalized advantage index: Translating research on prediction into individualized treatment recommendations. A demonstration. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083875.
    1. Dunlap WP, Cortina JM, Vaslow JB, Burke MJ. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods. 1996;1:170–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170.
    1. Dziura JD, Post LA, Zhao Q, Fu Z, Peduzzi P. Strategies for dealing with missing data in clinical trials: From design to analysis. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 2013;86:343–358. doi: 10.1002/pst.1549.
    1. Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. The American Psychologist. 2014;2:153–166. doi: 10.1037/a0035747.
    1. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152:2399–2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
    1. Fish RA, McGuire B, Hogan M, Stewart I, Morrison TG. Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain. 2010;149:435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016.
    1. Gilpin HR, Keyes A, Stahl DR, Greig R, McCracken LM. Predictors of treatment outcome in contextual cognitive and behavioral therapies for chronic pain: A systematic review. Journal of Pain. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.04.003.
    1. Gilpin HR, Stahl DR, McCracken LM. A theoretically guided approach to identifying predictors of treatment outcome in Contextual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for chronic pain. European Journal of Pain. 2018 doi: 10.1002/ejp.1310.
    1. Hawkins DM. Identification of outliers. London: Chapman & Hall; 1980.
    1. Hayes AF, Montoya AK, Rockwood NJ. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: Process versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 2017;25:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001.
    1. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:245–246. doi: 10.1002/wps.20442.
    1. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications; 2018.
    1. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
    1. Hayes SC, Vilatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2011;7:141–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449.
    1. Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B. Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1987;82:1147–1149. doi: 10.2307/2289392.
    1. Jensen MP, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editors. Handbook of pain assessment. New York: The Guildford Press; 1992.
    1. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2001;69:655–662. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.4.655.
    1. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Changes after multidisciplinary pain treatment in patient pain beliefs and coping are associated with concurrent changes in patient functioning. Pain. 2007;131:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.007.
    1. Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2007;3:1–27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.
    1. Kerns RD, Rudy TE, Turk DC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain. 1985;23:345–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1.
    1. Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS. Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2002;59:877. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877.
    1. Levin ME, Hildebrandt MJ, Lillis J, Hayes SC. The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: A meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behavior Therapy. 2012;43:741–756. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.05.003.
    1. Lisspers J, Nygren A, Soderman E. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): Some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1997;96:281–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x.
    1. Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1988;83:1198–1202. doi: 10.2307/2290157.
    1. Little RJ, D’Agostino R, Cohen ML, Dickersin K, Emerson SS, Farrar JT, Frangakis C, Hogan JW, Molenberghs G, Murphy SA, Neaton JD, Rotnitzky A, Scharfstein D, Shih WJ, Siegel JP, Stern H. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(14):1355–1360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1203730.
    1. Maric M, Wiers RW, Prins PJM. Ten ways to improve the use of statistical mediation analysis in the practice of child and adolescent treatment research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2012;15:77–191. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0114-y.
    1. McCracken LM. Committed action: An application of the psychological flexibility model to activity patterns in chronic pain. Journal of Pain. 2013;14:828–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.009.
    1. McCracken LM, Gutiérrez-Martínez O. Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2011;49:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004.
    1. McCracken LM, Morley S. The psychological flexibility model: A basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. Journal of Pain. 2014;15:221–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.014.
    1. McCracken LM, Turk DC. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain—Outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine. 2002;27:2564–2573. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000032130.45175.66.
    1. McCracken LM, Yang S. The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain. 2006;123:137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.021.
    1. Montoya AK, Hayes AF. Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods. 2017;22:6–27. doi: 10.1037/met0000086.
    1. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 2004;36:717–731. doi: 10.3758/bf03206553.
    1. Romano JM, Jensen MP, Turner JA, Good AB, Hops H. Chronic pain patient-partner interactions: Further support for a behavioral model of chronic pain. Behavior Therapy. 2000;31:415–440. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(00)80023-4.
    1. Romano JM, Turner JA, Jensen MP, Friedman LS, Bulcroft RA, Hops H, Wright SF. Chronic pain patient–spouse behavioral interactions predict patient disability. Pain. 1995;63:353–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00062-3.
    1. Rovner GS, Arestedt K, Gerdle B, Börsbo B, McCracken LM. Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2014;46:73–80. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1227.
    1. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Zaki HS, Curtin HD. Multiaxial assessment of pain: Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Computer program user’s manual. Version 2.1. Pittburgh, PA: Pain evaluation and Treatment Institute; 1989.
    1. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods. 2002;7:147–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.
    1. Scott W, Hann KEJ, McCracken LM. A comprehensive examination of changes in psychological flexibility following acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 2016;46:139–148. doi: 10.1007/s10879-016-9328-5.
    1. Spinhoven P, Hutten Mansfeld M, Den Ouden DJ, Ter Kuile M, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Vlaeyen JWS. Catastrophizing and internal pain control as mediators of outcome in the multidisciplinary treatment of chronic low back pain. European Journal of Pain. 2004;8:211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.08.003.
    1. Thoemmes F. Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2015;37:226–234. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1049351.
    1. Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, van Baalen B, Kleen M, Köke A, Reneman M, Schreurs KMG. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Exploration of psychometric properties in a heterogeneous chronic pain sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2014;30:289–295. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000191.
    1. Turner JA, Holtzman S, Mancl L. Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2007;127:276–286. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.005.
    1. Vlaeyen J, Linton S. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain. 2000;85:317–332. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0.
    1. Vowles KE, Wetherell JL, Sorrell JT. Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in chronic pain: Findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 2009;16:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.08.001.
    1. Vowles KE, Witkiewitz K, Sowden G, Ashworth J. Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: Evidence of mediation and clinically significant change following an abbreviated interdisciplinary program of rehabilitation. Journal of Pain. 2014;15:101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.002.
    1. Wicksell RK, Lekander M, Sorjonen K, Olsson GL. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)—Statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability. European Journal of Pain. 2010;14:771.e1–771.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.015.
    1. Wicksell RK, Olsson GL, Hayes SC. Psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvement in acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain following whiplash. European Journal of Pain. 2010;14:1059.e1–1059.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.05.001.
    1. Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;11:CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub3.
    1. Yu L, McCracken LM, Norton S. The Self Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ): Preliminary analyses for a measure of self in people with chronic pain. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2016;5:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.07.006.
    1. Yu L, Norton S, McCracken LM. Change in “Self-as-Context” (“Perspective-Taking”) occurs in acceptance and commitment therapy for people with chronic pain and is associated with improved functioning. Journal of Pain. 2017;18:664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.01.005.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir