Guided Bone Regeneration for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Defects

Arash Khojasteh, Lida Kheiri, Saeed Reza Motamedian, Vahid Khoshkam, Arash Khojasteh, Lida Kheiri, Saeed Reza Motamedian, Vahid Khoshkam

Abstract

Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is the most common technique for localized bone augmentation.

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to categorize and assess various GBR approaches for the reconstruction of human alveolar bone defects.

Materials and methods: Electronic search of four databases including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane and hand searching were performed to identify human trials attempting GBR for the reconstruction of alveolar bony defects for at least 10 patients from January 2000 to August 2015. To meet the inclusion criteria, studies had to report preoperative defect dimensions in addition to outcomes of bone formation and/or resorption.

Results: Twenty-five human clinical trials were included of which 17 used conventional technique that is the use of space maintaining membrane with bone grafting particles (GBR I). Application of block bone graft with overlying membrane and particulate fillers was reported in seven studies (GBR II), and utilizing cortical bone block tented over a defect preserving particulate fillers was reported by one study (GBR III). A wide range of initial defects' sizes and treatment results were reported.

Conclusions: This review introduces a therapeutically oriented classification system of GBR for treating alveolar bone defects. High heterogeneity among studies hindered drawing definite conclusions in regard to superiority of one to the other GBR technique.

Keywords: Alveolar ridge reconstruction; bone augmentation; bone grafting; implantology; nonresorbable membrane; resorbable membrane.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flowchart illustrating study selection for systematic review

References

    1. Shabestari GO, Shayesteh YS, Khojasteh A, Alikhasi M, Moslemi N, Aminian A, et al. Implant placement in patients with oral bisphosphonate therapy: A case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:175–80.
    1. Khojasteh A, Behnia H, Shayesteh YS, Morad G, Alikhasi M. Localized bone augmentation with cortical bone blocks tented over different particulate bone substitutes: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1481–93.
    1. Kolerman R, Nissan J, Tal H. Combined osteotome-induced ridge expansion and guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement: A biometric study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:691–704.
    1. Shayesteh YS, Khojasteh A, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Bassir SH, Hossaini M, et al. A comparative study of crestal bone loss and implant stability between osteotome and conventional implant insertion techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:350–7.
    1. von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: A clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:359–66.
    1. Boronat A, Carrillo C, Penarrocha M, Pennarocha M. Dental implants placed simultaneously with bone grafts in horizontal defects: A clinical retrospective study with 37 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:189–96.
    1. Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:19–25.
    1. Morad G, Khojasteh A. Cortical tenting technique versus onlay layered technique for vertical augmentation of atrophic posterior mandibles: A split-mouth pilot study. Implant Dent. 2013;22:566–71.
    1. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: A prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:299–307.
    1. Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM, Schüpbach P, Meijer HJ, Vissink A. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:877–84.
    1. Hassani A, Khojasteh A, Shamsabad AN. The anterior palate as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: A quantitative anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1196–200.
    1. Khojasteh A, Morad G, Behnia H. Clinical importance of recipient site characteristics for vertical ridge augmentation: A systematic review of literature and proposal of a classification. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39:386–98.
    1. Beitlitum I, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Clinical evaluation of particulate allogeneic with and without autogenous bone grafts and resorbable collagen membranes for bone augmentation of atrophic alveolar ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1242–50.
    1. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:117–24.
    1. Merkx MA, Maltha JC, Freihofer HP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Incorporation of particulated bone implants in the facial skeleton. Biomaterials. 1999;20:2029–35.
    1. Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: Micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:291–9.
    1. Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanoff CJ. Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single-tooth implants. Presentation of surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:106–9.
    1. Jung RE, Glauser R, Schärer P, Hämmerle CH, Sailer HF, Weber FE, et al. Effect of rhBMP-2 on guided bone regeneration in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:556–68.
    1. Todisco M. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:47–58.
    1. Khojasteh A, Hassani A, Motamedian SR, Saadat S, Alikhasi M. Cortical Bone Augmentation Versus Nerve Lateralization for Treatment of Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Study and Review of Literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:342–59.
    1. Eskan MA, Greenwell H, Hill M, Morton D, Vidal R, Shumway B, et al. Platelet-rich plasma-assisted guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2014;85:661–8.
    1. Ronda M, Rebaudi A, Torelli L, Stacchi C. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:859–66.
    1. Khojasteh A, Motamedian SR, Sharifzadeh N, Zadeh HH. The influence of initial alveolar ridge defect morphology on the outcome of implants in augmented atrophic posterior mandible: an exploratory retrospective study? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 [Article in press] doi: 10.1111/clr.12991.
    1. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J, Laurell L. Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration – Animal and human studies. Periodontol. 2000;1993;1:26–35.
    1. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49–70.
    1. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: A prospective case series in 22 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:404–14.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Med. 2009;3:123–30.
    1. Jung RE, Hälg GA, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:162–8.
    1. Funato A, Ishikawa T, Kitajima H, Yamada M, Moroi H. A novel combined surgical approach to vertical alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh, resorbable membrane, and rhPDGF-BB: A retrospective consecutive case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:437–45.
    1. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: Clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. J Periodontol. 2002;73:754–61.
    1. Kfir E, Kfir V, Eliav E, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive guided bone regeneration. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:205–10.
    1. De Boever AL, De Boever JA. Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: A prospective long-term clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:549–56.
    1. Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation with dental implant placement: Efficacy and complications associated with 2 different techniques. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:600–6.
    1. Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Aloy-Prósper A, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Canullo L, Peñarrocha-Diago M, et al. Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: Vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:659–66.
    1. Keith JD, Jr, Petrungaro P, Leonetti JA, Elwell CW, Zeren KJ, Caputo C, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of a mineralized block allograft: Results from the developmental period (2001-2004) Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:321–7.
    1. Wallace S, Gellin R. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation and implant placement in the maxilla. Implant Dent. 2010;19:272–9.
    1. Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: Clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2039–46.
    1. Nissan J, Mardinger O, Strauss M, Peleg M, Sacco R, Chaushu G, et al. Implant-supported restoration of congenitally missing teeth using cancellous bone block-allografts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:286–91.
    1. Peñarrocha-Diago M, Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Guirado JL, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts: Simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: A clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:846–53.
    1. Vanden Bogaerde L. A proposal for the classification of bony defects adjacent to dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:264–71.
    1. Caplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY. Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005;33:853–63.
    1. Wang HL, Katranji A. ABC sinus augmentation classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28:383–9.
    1. Khojasteh A, Eslaminejad MB, Nazarian H, Morad G, Dashti SG, Behnia H, et al. Vertical bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using particulate mineralized bone and mesenchymal stem cells: A preliminary study in rabbit. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39:3–13.
    1. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S, Polizzi G. Vertical ridge augmentation: What is the limit? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996;16:220–9.
    1. Sakka S, Coulthard P. Bone quality: A reality for the process of osseointegration. Implant Dent. 2009;18:480–5.
    1. Polimeni G, Koo KT, Qahash M, Xiropaidis AV, Albandar JM, Wikesjö UM, et al. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: Bone formation at teeth and titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:927–32.
    1. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: Systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy) J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:173–202.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir