Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms With the p64 Flow Modulation Device: Mid- and Long-Term Results in 617 Aneurysms From a Single Center

Marta Aguilar Pérez, Elina Henkes, Victoria Hellstern, Carmen Serna Candel, Christina Wendl, Hansjörg Bäzner, Oliver Ganslandt, Hans Henkes, Marta Aguilar Pérez, Elina Henkes, Victoria Hellstern, Carmen Serna Candel, Christina Wendl, Hansjörg Bäzner, Oliver Ganslandt, Hans Henkes

Abstract

Background: Flow diverters have become an important tool in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, especially when dealing with difficult-to-treat or complex aneurysms. The p64 is the only fully resheathable and mechanically detachable flow diverter available for clinical use.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of p64 for the treatment of intracranial saccular unruptured aneurysms arising from the anterior circulation over a long-term follow-up period.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database to identify all patients who underwent treatment for an intracranial saccular (unruptured or beyond the acute hemorrhage phase) aneurysm arising from the anterior circulation with ≥1 p64 between December 2011 and December 2019. Fusiform aneurysms and dissections were excluded. Aneurysms with prior or concomitant saccular treatment (eg, coiling and clipping) were included. Aneurysms with parent vessel implants other than p64 were excluded. Anatomic features, intraprocedural complications, clinical outcome, as well as clinical and angiographic follow-ups were all recorded.

Results: In total, 530 patients (388 females; median age 55.9 yr) with 617 intracranial aneurysms met the inclusion criteria. The average number of devices used per aneurysm was 1.1 (range 1-3). Mean aneurysm dome size was 4.8 mm (range 1-27 mm). Treatment-related morbimortality was 2.4%. Early, mid-term, and long-term angiographic follow-up showed complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion in 76.8%, 89.7%, and 94.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: Treatment of intracranial saccular unruptured aneurysms of the anterior circulation using p64 is a safe and effective treatment option with high rate of occlusion at long-term follow-up and low morbimortality.

Keywords: Anterior circulation aneurysm; Endovascular treatment; Flow diversion; Flow diverter stent; Intracranial aneurysms; p64 Flow Modulation Device.

© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flow chart representing the included aneurysms.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Unruptured right paraophthalmic aneurysm in a 65 yr-old female treated initially with a single Medina device and a single p64 FDS, both deployed during the same procedure A and B. Three days after treatment, the patient presented headache. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed bilateral cortical subarachnoidal hemorrhage C due to hyper-response to the DAPT (ASA and ticagrelor), which was confirmed by Multiplate (ADP 7 U, ASPI 6 U) and VerifyNow (P2Y12 45, ARU 369). The afternoon dose of ticagrelor was skipped. The following morning, the patient presented acute onset of left hemiparesis. Both Multiplate and VerifyNow showed then an insufficient inhibition for ticagrelor. Subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) confirmed occlusion of the right ICA due to acute thrombosis of the previous implanted FDS D, which was successfully recanalized by mechanical thrombectomy and aspiration E. The patient returned to baseline neurology (mRS 0). Angiography performed 3 mo after treatment demonstrated complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation F.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Unruptured M1 aneurysm in a 46 yr-old female treated with a single coil and a single p64 FDS A and B. The 3-mo follow-up angiography C showed a near occlusion of the aneurysms with a small neck remnant. The small lenticulostriate artery covered by the FDS was still patent. The 9-mo follow-up D showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm. The covered branch was reduced in filling but still patent. At 34-mo angiographic follow-up E showed partial recanalization of the aneurysm sac. The first follow-up angiography after retreatment with a second p64 device F showed again complete occlusion of the aneurysm.

References

    1. Dholakia R, Sadasivan C, Fiorella DJ, Woo HH, Lieber BB. Hemodynamics of flow diverters. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139(2):021002.
    1. Kadirvel R, Ding Y-H, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014;270(2):394-399.
    1. Fischer S, Aguilar-Perez M, Henkes Eet al. . Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(11):2082-2089.
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga Let al. . Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):70-76.
    1. Morais R, Mine B, Bruye`re PJet al. . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the p64 flow diverter stent: mid-term results in 35 patients with 41 intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(3):263-269.
    1. Sirakov S, Sirakov A, Bhogal Pet al. . The p64 Fow diverter – mid-term and long-term results from a single center. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(3):471-480.
    1. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology. 2011;53(1):37-41.
    1. Kulcsár Z, Houdart E, Bonafé Aet al. . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):20-25.
    1. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001;32(9):1998-2004.
    1. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Grant Met al. . Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2002;33(9):2243-2246.
    1. Martinez-Moreno R, Aguilar M, Wendl C, Bäzner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H. Fatal thrombosis of a flow diverter due to ibuprofen-related antagonization of acetylsalicylic acid. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016;26(3):355-358.
    1. Liou TM, Li YC.. Effects of stent porosity on hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. J Biomech. 2008;41(6):1174-1183.
    1. Augsburger L, Farhat M, Reymond Pet al. . Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Clin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(3):204-214.
    1. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge Set al. . Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):775-780.
    1. Briganti F, Napoli M, Leone Get al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(9):1683-1690.
    1. Chun On Tsang A, Man Yuen Fung A, Chung Pong Tsang Fet al. . Failure of flow diverter treatment of intracranial aneurysms related to the fetal-type posterior communicating artery. Neurointervention. 2015;10(2):60-66.
    1. Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I, Cekirge HS. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(3):529-535.
    1. Bhogal P, Martinez R, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H, Aguilar M. Management of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the M1 segment with flow diversion: a single centre experience. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018;28(2):209-216.
    1. Bhogal P, AlMatter M, Bäzner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H, Aguilar Pérez M. Flow diversion for the treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms - single centre experience. Front Neurol. 2017;8:20.
    1. Mpotsaris A, Skalej M, Beuing Oet al. . Long-term occlusion results with SILK flow diversion in 28 aneurysms: do recanalizations occur during follow-up? Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(3):300-310.
    1. Trivelato FP, Ulhôa AC, Rezende MTet al. . Recurrence of a totally occluded aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;2018:bcr-2018-013842.
    1. Pumar JM, Banguero A, Cuellar Het al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the SILK embolization device in a multicenter study. A retrospective data analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(4):595-601.
    1. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries Jet al. . Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(1):98-107.
    1. Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Kocer N, Griessenauer CJet al. . European multicenter study for the evaluation of a dual-layer flow-diverting stent for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: the European flow-redirection intraluminal device study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):841-847.
    1. Kraus B, Goertz L, Turowski Bet al. . Safety and efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicentric study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(1):68-73.
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia Met al. . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J. 2015;28(4):365-375.
    1. Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJet al. . Risk factors for ischemic complications following pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(9):1673-1678.
    1. Cagnazzo F, Lefevre PH, Derraz Iet al. . Flow-diversion treatment for unruptured nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms of the posterior and distal anterior circulation: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(1):134-139.
    1. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(2):442-447.
    1. Cagnazzo F, Mantilla D, Lefevre PHet al. . Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(12):2289-2294.
    1. Cagnazzo F, Perrini P, Dargazanli Cet al. . Treatment of unruptured distal anterior circulation aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(4):687-693.
    1. Schob S, Hoffmann K-T, Richter Cet al. . Flow diversion beyond the circle of Willis: endovascular aneurysm treatment in peripheral cerebral arteries employing a novel low-profile flow diverting stent. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(12):1227-1234.
    1. Sivasankar R, Shrivastava M, Limaye US. Experience with FRED junior flow diverter in treatment of cerebral aneurysms at or distal to the circle of Willis. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;69:166-169.
    1. Bhogal P, Bleise C, Chudyk Jet al. . The p48MW Flow Diverter – initial human experience. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019;11:396-399.
    1. Martínez-Galdámez M, Lamin SM, Lagios KGet al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(4):396-399.
    1. Lenz-Habijan T, Brodde M, Kehrel BEet al. . Comparison of the thrombogenicity of a bare and antithrombogenic coated flow diverter in an in vitro flow model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(1):140-146.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir