Opportunities and challenges in using real-world data for health care

Vivek A Rudrapatna, Atul J Butte, Vivek A Rudrapatna, Atul J Butte

Abstract

Real-world data (RWD) continue to emerge as a new source of clinical evidence. Although the best-known use case of RWD has been in drug regulation, RWD are being generated and used by many other parties, including biopharmaceutical companies, payors, clinical researchers, providers, and patients. In this Review, we describe 21 potential uses for RWD across the spectrum of health care. We also discuss important challenges and limitations relevant to the translation of these data into evidence.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: AJB is a cofounder of and consultant to Personalis and NuMedii; consultant to Samsung, Geisinger Health, Mango Tree Corp., Regenstrief Institute, and, in the recent past, 10x Genomics and Helix; shareholder in Personalis; and minor shareholder in Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Sarepta, 10x Genomics, Amazon, Biogen, CVS, Illumina, Snap, Sutro, and several other non–health-related companies and mutual funds. He has received honoraria and travel reimbursement for invited talks from Genentech, Roche, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Mars, Siemens, Optum, AbbVie, Westat, and many academic institutions, medical or disease-specific foundations and associations, and health systems. AJB receives royalty payments through Stanford University for several patents (US20160018413, WO2013169751, US2013039918, US20130080068, US20130116931, US20130090909, US20120101736, WO2011094731, and US20130071408) and other disclosures licensed to NuMedii and Personalis. AJB’s research has been funded by Northrop Grumman (as the prime on an NIH contract), Genentech, and, in the recent past, L’Oréal and Progenity.

Figures

Figure 1. Participants in the health care…
Figure 1. Participants in the health care ecosystem that generate and consume health care data.
Patients (and the communities they constitute) are the fundamental source of all clinical data. Much of the clinical data they generate emanates from clinic visits with health care providers. They also generate data from the pharmacies they purchase treatments from, the registries they participate in, and their use of modern/evolving technologies such as social media and wearables. In the setting of a traditional or telehealth-based encounter, clinical data in the form of laboratory test results, imaging, and notes are all generated and housed with an EHR system. These data may be repackaged and sent to managed care organizations and health care payors to facilitate reimbursement. These payors also transmit data relevant to drug benefits to pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), who negotiate payment for drugs dispensed in pharmacies. Quality data from the EHR are also used by accountable care organizations (ACOs) to support certain quality-based reimbursement schemes. EHR data are also consumed by clinical researchers, individuals who oversee health care operations, and data aggregators. The latter deidentify and repackage these data for consumption by a variety of parties, including biopharmaceutical companies and regulators, as relevant for monitoring of treatment safety and efficacy, among other uses. Although most patient data represent a form of RWD, some patient data are collected in the setting of controlled trials. Although data from cardiac devices (e.g., pacemakers/cardioverter-defibrillators) and glucose meters occasionally end up in the EHR, data from consumer wearables and sensors and social media are currently not integrated into EHR systems. However, these data are increasingly being studied for their potential utility in health care, and may be integrated in the future. Adapted with permission from Datavant (58).

References

    1. FDA. Framework for FDA’s Real-World Evidence Program. 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Berger M, et al. A framework for regulatory use of real-world evidence. Updated September 13, 2017. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Craig P, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182–1186. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375.
    1. FDA. FDA’s Sentinel Initiative. Updated October 18, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. FDA. MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program. Updated December 2, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Sentinel Initiative. Sentinel Common Data Model. Updated October 31, 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Sarker A, et al. Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: a review. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004.
    1. Nikfarjam A, et al. Early detection of adverse drug reactions in social health networks: a natural language processing pipeline for signal detection. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019;5(2):e11264. doi: 10.2196/11264.
    1. Altschuler E, Kast R. Methods of modulating TNF using bupropion. US patent 6,5656,005. August 3, 2006.
    1. Kast RE, Altschuler EL. Remission of Crohn’s disease on bupropion. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(5):1260–1261. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29467.
    1. Lorberbaum T, et al. Coupling data mining and laboratory experiments to discover drug interactions causing QT prolongation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(16):1756–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.761.
    1. Kahn SE, et al. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(23):2427–2443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066224.
    1. Home PD, et al. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9681):2125–2135. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3.
    1. Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.
    1. FDA. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2017 New Drug Therapy Approvals. pdf. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Honig N. Will new “real world evidence” standard hurt drug safety? January 30, 2017. Dome: Law, Legislation & Policy. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Chatterjee A, Chilukuri S, Fleming E, Knepp A, Rathore S, Zabinski J. Real-world evidence: driving a new drug development paradigm in oncology. McKinsey & Co. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Davies J, Martinec M, Martina R. Retrospective indirect comparison of alectinib phase II data vs ceritinib real-world data in ALK+ NSCLC after progression on crizotinib. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl 2):mdx091.018
    1. Mok T, et al. ASCEND-2: a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II study of ceritinib in adult patients (pts) with ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy and crizotinib (CRZ) J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(15 suppl):8059
    1. FDA. FDA expands approved use of metastatic breast cancer treatment to include male patients. n. Updated April 4, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. FDA. FDA expands use of Sapien 3 artificial heart valve for high-risk patients. Updated June 5, 2017. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Meyer A, Rudant J, Drouin J, Weill A, Carbonnel F, Coste J. Effectiveness and safety of reference infliximab and biosimilar in Crohn disease: a French equivalence study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(2):99–107. doi: 10.7326/M18-1512.
    1. De Cock D, Watson K, Hyrich KL. Biosimilars in the UK: early real world data from the british society for rheumatology biologics registers for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:555–556.
    1. Rudrapatna VA, Velayos F. Biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Pract Gastroenterol. 2019;43(4):84–91.
    1. Deloitte. Getting real with real-world evidence (RWE). 2017 RWE Benchwork Survey. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Visweswaran S, et al. Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT): a Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium network. JAMIA Open. 2018;1(2):147–152. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy033.
    1. TriNetX. InSite: The largest European live clinical data network. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Sargent DJ, George SL. Clinical trials data collection: when less is more. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(34):5019–5021. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.7024.
    1. Saville BR, Berry SM. Efficiencies of platform clinical trials: a vision of the future. Clin Trials. 2016;13(3):358–366. doi: 10.1177/1740774515626362.
    1. Nordon C, et al. The “efficacy-effectiveness gap”: historical background and current conceptualization. Value Health. 2016;19(1):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2938.
    1. Hemkens LG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JP. Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey. BMJ. 2016;352:i493.
    1. Franklin JM, Dejene S, Huybrechts KF, Wang SV, Kulldorff M, Rothman KJ. A bias in the evaluation of bias comparing randomized trials with nonexperimental studies. Epidemiol Methods. 2017;6(1):20160018.
    1. Liu KA, Mager NA. Women’s involvement in clinical trials: historical perspective and future implications. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2016;14(1):708. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708.
    1. Zoccali C, et al. Children of a lesser god: exclusion of chronic kidney disease patients from clinical trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(7):1112–1114. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz023.
    1. Ko MS, Rudrapatna V, Avila P, Mahadevan U. Safety of flexible sigmoidoscopy in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):S-18–S-19.
    1. Godino C, et al. Real-world 2-year outcome of atrial fibrillation treatment with dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Intern Emerg Med. 2019;14(8):1259–1270. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02100-9.
    1. Borghouts LB, Keizer HA. Exercise and insulin sensitivity: a review. Int J Sports Med. 2000;21(1):1–12. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8847.
    1. Alexakis C, Saxena S, Chhaya V, Cecil E, Majeed A, Pollok R. Smoking status at diagnosis and subsequent smoking cessation: associations with corticosteroid use and intestinal resection in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(11):1689–1700. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0273-7.
    1. Kuenzig ME, et al. The NOD2-smoking interaction in Crohn’s disease is likely specific to the 1007fs mutation and may be explained by age at diagnosis: a meta-analysis and case-only study. EBioMedicine. 2017;21:188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.06.012.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Incorporating social determinants of health in electronic health records: a qualitative study of perspectives on current practices among top vendors. Updated October 15, 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2112.
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.
    1. Pearson SD. Cost, coverage, and comparative effectiveness research: the critical issues for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4275–4281. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6601.
    1. Rosenthal E. The soaring cost of a simple breath. New York Times. October 12, 2013. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Arnold J. Are pharmacy benefit managers the good guys or bad guys of drug pricing? STAT. August 27, 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Tolerability and safety of switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. NCT02980042. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Krumholz HM. Variations in health care, patient preferences, and high-quality decision making. JAMA. 2013;310(2):151–152. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.7835.
    1. Ashley EA, et al. Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome. Lancet. 2010;375(9725):1525–1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60452-7.
    1. Christensen KD, Phillips KA, Green RC, Dukhovny D. Cost analyses of genomic sequencing: lessons learned from the MedSeq Project. Value Health. 2018;21(9):1054–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.013.
    1. Stark Z, et al. Integrating genomics into healthcare: a global responsibility. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014.
    1. Longhurst CA, Harrington RA, Shah NH. A ‘green button’ for using aggregate patient data at the point of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(7):1229–1235. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0099.
    1. Schuler A, Callahan A, Jung K, Shah NH. Performing an informatics consult: methods and challenges. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3 pt B):563–568.
    1. . Health IT in Health Care Settings. Blue Button. Updated April 8, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. OpenNotes. Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Maxmen A. AI researchers embrace Bitcoin technology to share medical data. Nature. 2018;555(7696):293–294. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-02641-7.
    1. Khoury MJ, Iademarco MF, Riley WT. Precision public health for the era of precision medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(3):398–401. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.031.
    1. Kuo AK, Summers NM, Vohra S, Kahn RS, Bibbins-Domingo K. The promise of precision population health: reducing health disparities through a community partnership framework. Adv Pediatr. 2019;66:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2019.03.002.
    1. May T. The fragmentation of health data. Datavant. July 31, 2018. Accessed January 8, 2020.
    1. Rudrapatna VA, Butte AJ. Robust measurement of the real world effectiveness of Tofacitinib for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis using electronic health records: a protocol and statistical analysis plan. Updated May 22, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir