Ethical challenges in resuscitation

Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Anne-Marie Slowther, Zoe Fritz, Claudio Sandroni, Theodoros Xanthos, Clifton Callaway, Gavin D Perkins, Craig Newgard, Eleni Ischaki, Robert Greif, Erwin Kompanje, Leo Bossaert, Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Anne-Marie Slowther, Zoe Fritz, Claudio Sandroni, Theodoros Xanthos, Clifton Callaway, Gavin D Perkins, Craig Newgard, Eleni Ischaki, Robert Greif, Erwin Kompanje, Leo Bossaert

Abstract

Purpose: A rapidly evolving resuscitation science provides more effective treatments to an aging population with multiple comorbidites. Concurrently, emergency care has become patient-centered. This review aims to describe challenges associated with the application of key principles of bioethics in resuscitation and post-resuscitation care; propose actions to address these challenges; and highlight the need for evidence-based ethics and consensus on ethical principles interpretation.

Methods: Following agreement on the article's outline, subgroups of 2-3 authors provided narrative reviews of ethical issues concerning autonomy and honesty, beneficence/nonmaleficence and dignity, justice, specific practices/circumstances such as family presence during resuscitation, and emergency research. Proposals for addressing ethical challenges were also offered.

Results: Respect for patient autonomy can be realized through honest provision of information, shared decision-making, and advance directives/care planning. Essential prerequisites comprise public and specific healthcare professionals' education, appropriate regulatory provisions, and allocation of adequate resources. Regarding beneficence/nonmaleficence, resuscitation should benefit patients, while avoiding harm from futile interventions; pertinent practice should be based on neurological prognostication and patient/family-reported outcomes. Regarding dignity, aggressive life-sustaining treatments against patients preferences should be avoided. Contrary to the principle of justice, resuscitation quality may be affected by race/income status, age, ethnicity, comorbidity, and location (urban versus rural or country-specific/region-specific). Current evidence supports family presence during resuscitation. Regarding emergency research, autonomy should be respected without hindering scientific progress; furthermore, transparency of research conduct should be promoted and funding increased.

Conclusions: Major ethical challenges in resuscitation science need to be addressed through complex/resource-demanding interventions. Such actions require support by ongoing/future research.

Keywords: Beneficence; Personal autonomy; Resuscitation; Social justice.

References

    1. Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:A4-5
    1. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1078-1082
    1. JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1971-1972
    1. Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:84-91
    1. PLoS One. 2014 May 28;9(5):e98246
    1. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:75-81
    1. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1662-9
    1. Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:188-95
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Feb 8;153(3):375-81
    1. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S383-96
    1. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:202-22
    1. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):188-201
    1. CMAJ. 2011 Aug 9;183(11):1242-3
    1. Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:108-15
    1. Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):2076-80
    1. Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):594-601
    1. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494
    1. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18):1876-9
    1. Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):451-3
    1. Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):174-81
    1. J Med Ethics. 2005 Mar;31(3):127-30
    1. Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):825-30
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):496-503
    1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Sep;13(3):351-9
    1. J Med Ethics. 2010 Jun;36(6):353-7
    1. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11;173(20):1872-8
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):228-33
    1. Resuscitation. 2010 Nov;81(11):1479-87
    1. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:302-11
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2125-30
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(5 Suppl):S84-90
    1. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):607-608
    1. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):245-56
    1. Resuscitation. 2017 Aug;117:109-117
    1. Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):628-34
    1. Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;28(8):1000-25
    1. J Med Ethics. 1996 Apr;22(2):95-9
    1. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 8;17 (1):69
    1. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;70(1):122-125
    1. Eur J Health Law. 2009 Sep;16(3):207-27
    1. Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:49-57
    1. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Apr-May;25(2):152-4
    1. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):30-42
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1607-15
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 25;367(17):1607-15
    1. J Med Ethics. 1984 Dec;10(4):173-8
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1816-31
    1. Intensive Care Med. 1997 Dec;23(12):1264-7
    1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 31;3(1):e000400
    1. Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:328-40
    1. JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1423-31
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Nov;36(11):1962-5
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10 ):1501-1503
    1. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Dec;19(6):630-5
    1. BMJ. 2017 Feb 28;356:j813
    1. J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):593-7
    1. Palliat Med. 2003 Apr;17(3):263-9
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 15;190(8):855-66
    1. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8
    1. Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1672-6
    1. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:94-98
    1. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1990-1992
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep 15;186(6):480-6
    1. J Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):71-80
    1. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):696-713
    1. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jan;11(1):e003566
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1912-20
    1. PLoS Med. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):e1001819
    1. Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:118-124
    1. Resuscitation. 2016 Mar;100:11-7
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1065-7

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir