National Costs Associated With Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hospitalizations in the United States, 2010-2014

Eili Y Klein, Wendi Jiang, Nestor Mojica, Katie K Tseng, Ryan McNeill, Sara E Cosgrove, Trish M Perl, Eili Y Klein, Wendi Jiang, Nestor Mojica, Katie K Tseng, Ryan McNeill, Sara E Cosgrove, Trish M Perl

Abstract

Background: Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been associated with worse patient outcomes and higher costs of care than methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) infections. However, since prior studies found these differences, the healthcare landscape has changed, including widespread dissemination of community-associated strains of MRSA. We sought to provide updated estimates of the excess costs of MRSA infections.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the National Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for the years 2010-2014. We calculated costs for hospitalizations, including MRSA- and MSSA-related septicemia and pneumonia infections, as well as MRSA- and MSSA-related infections from conditions classified elsewhere and of an unspecified site ("other infections"). Differences in the costs of hospitalization were estimated using propensity score-adjusted mortality outcomes for 2010-2014.

Results: In 2014, estimated costs were highest for pneumonia and sepsis-related hospitalizations. Propensity score-adjusted costs were significantly higher for MSSA-related pneumonia ($40725 vs $38561; P = .045) and other hospitalizations ($15578 vs $14792; P < .001) than for MRSA-related hospitalizations. Similar patterns were observed from 2010 to 2013, although crude cost differences between MSSA- and MRSA-related pneumonia hospitalizations rose from 25.8% in 2010 to 31.0% in 2014. Compared with MSSA-related hospitalizations, MRSA-related hospitalizations had a higher adjusted mortality rate.

Conclusions: Although MRSA infections had been previously associated with higher hospitalization costs, our results suggest that, in recent years, costs associated with MSSA-related infections have converged with and may surpass costs of similar MRSA-related hospitalizations.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Excess cost of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) hospitalizations, 2010–2014. The excess cost of MRSA-related hospitalizations compared wth MSSA-related hospitalizations was measured as the mean cost of MRSA-related hospitalizations minus the mean cost of MSSA-related hospitalizations. The arrows indicate the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the means. The negative values indicate that MRSA-related hospitalizations were, on average, less costly than similar MSSA-related hospitalizations. The stars indicate the P-value of whether the mean was significantly different from 0 at P < .05 (*) or P < .01 (**).

References

    1. Patricia Jevons M. “Celbenin”-resistant staphylococci. Br Med J 1961; 1:124–5.
    1. Barber M. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 1961; 14:385–93.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Atlanta, GA, 2013. Available at: . Accessed 31 May 2014.
    1. Klein EY, Sun L, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R. The changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: a national observational study. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177:666–74.
    1. Klein EY, Mojica N, Jiang W, et al. . Trends in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations in the United States, 2010–2014. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1921–3.
    1. Shorr AF. Epidemiology and economic impact of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: review and analysis of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2007; 25:751–68.
    1. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:166–74.
    1. Filice GA, Nyman JA, Lexau C, et al. . Excess costs and utilization associated with methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31:365–73.
    1. Reed SD, Friedman JY, Engemann JJ, et al. . Costs and outcomes among hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-resistant or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:175–83.
    1. Rubin RJ, Harrington CA, Poon A, Dietrich K, Greene JA, Moiduddin A. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5:9–17.
    1. Engemann JJ, Carmeli Y, Cosgrove SE, et al. . Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:592–8.
    1. McHugh CG, Riley LW. Risk factors and costs associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25:425–30.
    1. Lodise TP, McKinnon PS. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 52:113–22.
    1. Stewardson AJ, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, et al. . The health and economic burden of bloodstream infections caused by antimicrobial-susceptible and non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus in European hospitals, 2010 and 2011: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Euro Surveill 2016; 21:pii=30319 Available at: . Accessed 18 August 2017.
    1. Ben-David D, Novikov I, Mermel LA. Are there differences in hospital cost between patients with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and those with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bloodstream infection?Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30:453–60.
    1. Houchens R, Ross D, Elixhauser A, Jiang J.. Nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) redesign final report. Rockville, MD: US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014. Available at: . Accessed 12 July 2017.
    1. Cost-to-charge ratio files: user guide for National Inpatient Sample (NIS) CCRs. Rockville, MD: US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017. Available at: . Accessed 12 July 2017.
    1. Dugoff EH, Schuler M, Stuart EA. Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res 2014; 49:284–303.
    1. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43:1130–9.
    1. May L, Klein EY, Martinez EM, Mojica N, Miller LG. Incidence and factors associated with emergency department visits for recurrent skin and soft tissue infections in patients in California, 2005–2011. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 145:746–54.
    1. David MZ, Boyle-Vavra S, Zychowski DL, Daum RS. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus as a predominantly healthcare-associated pathogen: a possible reversal of roles?PLoS One 2011; 6:e18217.
    1. McDanel JS, Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:361–7.
    1. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:53–9.
    1. Schaefer MK, Ellingson K, Conover C, et al. . Evaluation of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for reporting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections at a hospital in Illinois. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31:463–8.
    1. Goto M, Ohl ME, Schweizer ML, Perencevich EN. Accuracy of administrative code data for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:688–96.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir