Use of clomiphene citrate protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation impairs endometrial maturity

Ivan Sereno Montenegro, Cristiana Palma Kuhl, Raquel de Almeida Schneider, Suzana de Azevedo Zachia, Isabel Cirne Lima de Oliveira Durli, Paula Barros Terraciano, Raquel Camara Rivero, Eduardo P Passos, Ivan Sereno Montenegro, Cristiana Palma Kuhl, Raquel de Almeida Schneider, Suzana de Azevedo Zachia, Isabel Cirne Lima de Oliveira Durli, Paula Barros Terraciano, Raquel Camara Rivero, Eduardo P Passos

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent advances in assisted reproduction techniques and recent knowledge regarding embryo and endometrium quality, implantation and birth rates remain low. The objective of this study was to investigate whether clomiphene citrate alters endometrial maturation in infertile patients.

Methods: In a prospective self-matched cohort study, we assessed the ovulation of women in spontaneous and stimulated cycles (with clomiphene citrate). We determined the ovulation day by ultrasound scanning. In both cycles, we took four blood samples (BS1 - at early proliferative phase, BS2 - at mid proliferative phase, BS3 - after ovulation and BS4 - at mid luteal phase) to determine the serum concentrations of FSH, LH, estradiol and progesterone. We retrieved an endometrial biopsy five days after ovulation, followed by blinded analysis and classification according to Noyes criteria, in both cycles.

Results: Twenty-two participants completed the study. There were significant differences in FSH BS3 (p=0.001), in LH BS3 and BS4 (p<0.001 and p=0.049, respectively), in estradiol BS2, BS3 and BS4 (p<0.001, p=0.024 and p<0.001, respectively) and in progesterone BS3 and BS4 (p=0.028 and p<0.001, respectively). Considering Noyes criteria, there was a one-day delay when comparing the stimulated cycle with the spontaneous cycle (p=0.004), and a two-day delay when comparing the stimulated cycle with the biopsy day.

Conclusion: This study indicates that ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate delays the endometrial maturity, and could possibly impair the implantation process due to asynchrony.

Keywords: IVF; Noyes criteria; assisted reproduction techniques; endometrial maturity; endometrial receptivity.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure and declare that there was no support from any organization for the submitted paper, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted study in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the assessments in spontaneous and stimulated cycles. Following a spontaneous cycle, all 22 participants underwent a stimulated cycle using 100 mg/day of clomiphene citrate between days 3 and 7 of the cycle. When the leading follicle had a diameter of 17 mm (represented by **), they received 10.000 UI of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation. Endometrial biopsy (EB) was performed 5 days after ovulation confirmation (represented by *) by ultrasonography. In both cycles blood samples (BS) were taken at the early proliferative phase (days 1 -3), in the midproliferative phase (days 8-10), when confirmed ovulation, and five days after ovulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants’ causes of infertility.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endometrial cycle dating based on Noyes et al. (1950) criteria (200x): (A) Day 17: “piano key” appearance of glandular epithelium with vacuoles at nuclei level; (B) Day 18: luminal vacuoles with smaller size and the nuclei approaching the base of the glandular cell; (C) Day 19: presence of intraluminal secretion with few vacuoles on cellular cytoplasm, absence of mitosis and pseudo stratification; (D) Day 20: the peak of intraluminal secretion with stromal edema onset, presence of rare vacuoles and round nuclei located at the base of the glandular cell.; (E) Day 23: presence of prominent spiral arterioles with thickened walls, coiling and endothelial proliferation; (F) stromal-glandular dissociation - gland on day 17 with decidualized stroma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median comparison of Noyes criteria results.

References

    1. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1301–1305. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1190-9.
    1. Bonhoff AJ, Naether OG, Johannisson E. Effects of clomiphene citrate stimulation on endometrial structure in infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:844–849. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019264.
    1. Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, Diamond MP, Carson SA, Legro RS, McGovern PG, Schlaff WD, Carr BR, Steinkampf MP, Silva S, Vogel DL, Leppert PC, NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:1264–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.069.
    1. Dieamant F, Vagnini LD, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Renzi A, Petersen B, Mattila MC, Nicoletti A, Oliveira JBA, Baruffi R, Franco Jr JG. New therapeutic protocol for improvement of endometrial receptivity (PRIMER) for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) - A pilot study. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23:250–254. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190035.
    1. Edgell TA, Rombauts LJ, Salamonsen LA. Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27:486–496. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.05.014.
    1. Enciso M, Carrascosa JP, Sarasa J, Martínez-Ortiz PA, Munné S, Horcajadas JA, Aizpurua J. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:220–228. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex370.
    1. Evans GE, Phillipson GTM, Sykes PH, McNoe LA, Print CG, Evans JJ. Does the endometrial gene expression of fertile women vary within and between cycles? Hum Reprod. 2018;33:452–463. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex385.
    1. Gadalla MA, Huang S, Wang R, Norman RJ, Abdullah SA, El Saman AM, Ismail AM, van Wely M, Mol BWJ. Effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial thickness, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth in anovulatory women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:64–76. doi: 10.1002/uog.18933.
    1. Garrido-Gómez T, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Vilella F, Simón C. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1078–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.005.
    1. Gonzalez RR, Palomino A, Vantman D, Gabler F, Devoto L. Abnormal pattern of integrin expression at the implantation window in endometrium from fertile women treated with clomiphene citrate and users of intrauterine device. Early Pregnancy. 2001;5:132–143.
    1. Jie L, Li D, Yang C, Haiying Z. Tamoxifen versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in infertile women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.022.
    1. Kliman HJ, Frankfurter D. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:618–628. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.011.
    1. Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111:611–617. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.009.
    1. Li MQ, Jin LP. Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization alters the protein profile expression in endometrial secretion. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:1964–1971.
    1. Lindheim SR, Glenn TL, Smith MC, Gagneux P. Ovulation Induction for the General Gynecologist. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018;68:242–252. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1130-8.
    1. Miravet-Valenciano JA, Rincon-Bertolin A, Vilella F, Simon C. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:187–192. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000173.
    1. Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Zaino RJ, Lessey BA, Novotny DB, Ireland K, Zeng D, Fritz MA. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1333–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.030.
    1. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1950;5:561–564.
    1. Palomino WA, Fuentes A, González RR, Gabler F, Boric MA, Vega M, Devoto L. Differential expression of endometrial integrins and progesterone receptor during the window of implantation in normo-ovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.020.
    1. Paulson RJ. Introduction: Endometrial receptivity: evaluation, induction and inhibition. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:609–610. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.029.
    1. Reed BG, Wu JL, Nemer LB, Carr BR, Bukulmez O. Use of Clomiphene Citrate in minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization negatively impacts endometrial thickness: an argument for a freeze-all approach. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018;22:355–362. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180070.
    1. Siristatidis CS, Sertedaki E, Vaidakis D, Varounis C, Trivella M. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD011872. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011872.pub2.
    1. van der Gaast MH, Classen-Linke I, Krusche CA, Beier-Hellwig K, Fauser BC, Beier HM, Macklon NS. Impact of ovarian stimulation on mid-luteal endometrial tissue and secretion markers of receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:553–563. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60244-1.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, STROBE initiative Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1500–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir