Inhibition of PCSK9 potentiates immune checkpoint therapy for cancer
Xinjian Liu, Xuhui Bao, Mengjie Hu, Hanman Chang, Meng Jiao, Jin Cheng, Liyi Xie, Qian Huang, Fang Li, Chuan-Yuan Li, Xinjian Liu, Xuhui Bao, Mengjie Hu, Hanman Chang, Meng Jiao, Jin Cheng, Liyi Xie, Qian Huang, Fang Li, Chuan-Yuan Li
Abstract
Despite its success in achieving the long-term survival of 10-30% of treated individuals, immune therapy is still ineffective for most patients with cancer1,2. Many efforts are therefore underway to identify new approaches that enhance such immune 'checkpoint' therapy3-5 (so called because its aim is to block proteins that inhibit checkpoint signalling pathways in T cells, thereby freeing those immune cells to target cancer cells). Here we show that inhibiting PCSK9-a key protein in the regulation of cholesterol metabolism6-8-can boost the response of tumours to immune checkpoint therapy, through a mechanism that is independent of PCSK9's cholesterol-regulating functions. Deleting the PCSK9 gene in mouse cancer cells substantially attenuates or prevents their growth in mice in a manner that depends on cytotoxic T cells. It also enhances the efficacy of immune therapy that is targeted at the checkpoint protein PD1. Furthermore, clinically approved PCSK9-neutralizing antibodies synergize with anti-PD1 therapy in suppressing tumour growth in mouse models of cancer. Inhibiting PCSK9-either through genetic deletion or using PCSK9 antibodies-increases the expression of major histocompatibility protein class I (MHC I) proteins on the tumour cell surface, promoting robust intratumoral infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. Mechanistically, we find that PCSK9 can disrupt the recycling of MHC I to the cell surface by associating with it physically and promoting its relocation and degradation in the lysosome. Together, these results suggest that inhibiting PCSK9 is a promising way to enhance immune checkpoint therapy for cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interest X.L. and C. L. are inventors on a patent application filed by Duke University that covers the use of anti-PCSK9 antibody in cancer immunotherapy. The other authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
References
- Topalian SL et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 366, 2443–2454, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200690 (2012).
- Brahmer JR et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med 366, 2455–2465, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200694 (2012).
- Manguso RT et al. In vivo CRISPR screening identifies Ptpn2 as a cancer immunotherapy target. Nature 547, 413–418, doi:10.1038/nature23270 (2017).
- Pan D et al. A major chromatin regulator determines resistance of tumor cells to T cell-mediated killing. Science 359, 770–775, doi:10.1126/science.aao1710 (2018).
- Patel SJ et al. Identification of essential genes for cancer immunotherapy. Nature 548, 537–542, doi:10.1038/nature23477 (2017).
- Abifadel M et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat Genet 34, 154–156, doi:10.1038/ng1161 (2003).
- Cohen J et al. Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9. Nat Genet 37, 161–165, doi:10.1038/ng1509 (2005).
- Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley TH Jr. & Hobbs HH Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 354, 1264–1272, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054013 (2006).
- Yang W et al. Potentiating the antitumour response of CD8(+) T cells by modulating cholesterol metabolism. Nature 531, 651–655, doi:10.1038/nature17412 (2016).
- Ma X et al. Cholesterol negatively regulates IL-9-producing CD8(+) T cell differentiation and antitumor activity. J Exp Med 215, 1555–1569, doi:10.1084/jem.20171576 (2018).
- Naslavsky N, Weigert R & Donaldson JG Characterization of a nonclathrin endocytic pathway: membrane cargo and lipid requirements. Mol Biol Cell 15, 3542–3552, doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-02-0151 (2004).
- Benjannet S et al. NARC-1/PCSK9 and its natural mutants: zymogen cleavage and effects on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and LDL cholesterol. J Biol Chem 279, 48865–48875, doi:10.1074/jbc.M409699200 (2004).
- Maxwell KN, Fisher EA & Breslow JL Overexpression of PCSK9 accelerates the degradation of the LDLR in a post-endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 2069–2074, doi:10.1073/pnas.0409736102 (2005).
- Zhang DW et al. Binding of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 to epidermal growth factor-like repeat A of low density lipoprotein receptor decreases receptor recycling and increases degradation. J Biol Chem 282, 18602–18612, doi:10.1074/jbc.M702027200 (2007).
- Lagace TA et al. Secreted PCSK9 decreases the number of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and in livers of parabiotic mice. J Clin Invest 116, 2995–3005, doi:10.1172/JCI29383 (2006).
- Poirier S et al. Dissection of the endogenous cellular pathways of PCSK9-induced low density lipoprotein receptor degradation: evidence for an intracellular route. J Biol Chem 284, 28856–28864, doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.037085 (2009).
- Poirier S et al. The proprotein convertase PCSK9 induces the degradation of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and its closest family members VLDLR and ApoER2. J Biol Chem 283, 2363–2372, doi:10.1074/jbc.M708098200 (2008).
- Canuel M et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) can mediate degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1). PLoS One 8, e64145, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064145 (2013).
- Demers A et al. PCSK9 Induces CD36 Degradation and Affects Long-Chain Fatty Acid Uptake and Triglyceride Metabolism in Adipocytes and in Mouse Liver. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 35, 2517–2525, doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306032 (2015).
- Jonas MC, Costantini C & Puglielli L PCSK9 is required for the disposal of non-acetylated intermediates of the nascent membrane protein BACE1. EMBO Rep 9, 916–922, doi:10.1038/embor.2008.132 (2008).
- Blom DJ et al. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med 370, 1809–1819, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1316222 (2014).
- Robinson JG et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 372, 1489–1499, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501031 (2015).
- Cong L et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823, doi:10.1126/science.1231143 (2013).
- Ran FA et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 8, 2281–2308, doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 (2013).
- Ishibashi S et al. Hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J Clin Invest 92, 883–893, doi:10.1172/JCI116663 (1993).
- Wolchok JD et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369, 122–133, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1302369 (2013).
- Kuhnast S et al. Alirocumab inhibits atherosclerosis, improves the plaque morphology, and enhances the effects of a statin. J Lipid Res 55, 2103–2112, doi:10.1194/jlr.M051326 (2014).
- Chan JC et al. A proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 neutralizing antibody reduces serum cholesterol in mice and nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 9820–9825, doi:10.1073/pnas.0903849106 (2009).
- Kim K et al. Eradication of metastatic mouse cancers resistant to immune checkpoint blockade by suppression of myeloid-derived cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 11774–11779, doi:10.1073/pnas.1410626111 (2014).
- Chandramohan V et al. Improved efficacy against malignant brain tumors with EGFRwt/EGFRvIII targeting immunotoxin and checkpoint inhibitor combinations. J Immunother Cancer 7, 142, doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0614-0 (2019).
- Hogquist KA et al. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76, 17–27 (1994).
- Shan L et al. PCSK9 binds to multiple receptors and can be functionally inhibited by an EGF-A peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 375, 69–73, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.106 (2008).
- Fasano T, Sun XM, Patel DD & Soutar AK Degradation of LDLR protein mediated by ‘gain of function’ PCSK9 mutants in normal and ARH cells. Atherosclerosis 203, 166–171, doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.027 (2009).
- Duff CJ et al. Antibody-mediated disruption of the interaction between PCSK9 and the low-density lipoprotein receptor. Biochem J 419, 577–584, doi:10.1042/BJ20082407 (2009).
- Yu YY et al. Definition and transfer of a serological epitope specific for peptide-empty forms of MHC class I. Int Immunol 11, 1897–1906, doi:10.1093/intimm/11.12.1897 (1999).
- Zhang L et al. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 348, 203–213, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020177 (2003).
- Carstens JL et al. Spatial computation of intratumoral T cells correlates with survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Nat Commun 8, 15095, doi:10.1038/ncomms15095 (2017).
- Labun K et al. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 47, W171–W174, doi:10.1093/nar/gkz365 (2019).
- Shalem O et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87, doi:10.1126/science.1247005 (2014).
- Borowicz S et al. The soft agar colony formation assay. J Vis Exp, e51998, doi:10.3791/51998 (2014).
- Moore MW, Carbone FR & Bevan MJ Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54, 777–785 (1988).
- Curtsinger JM, Lins DC & Mescher MF CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly-6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells to (CD44low, Ly-6C-) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to antigen. J Immunol 160, 3236–3243 (1998).
- Park SJ, Yoon BH, Kim SK & Kim SY GENT2: an updated gene expression database for normal and tumor tissues. BMC Med Genomics 12, 101, doi:10.1186/s12920-019-0514-7 (2019).
- Cerami E et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2, 401–404, doi:10.1158/-12-0095 (2012).
- Gao J et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 6, pl1, doi:10.1126/scisignal.2004088 (2013).
Source: PubMed