A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014-2019)

Sergi Fàbregues, Quan Nha Hong, Elsa Lucia Escalante-Barrios, Timothy C Guetterman, Julio Meneses, Michael D Fetters, Sergi Fàbregues, Quan Nha Hong, Elsa Lucia Escalante-Barrios, Timothy C Guetterman, Julio Meneses, Michael D Fetters

Abstract

Mixed methods research has been increasingly recognized as a useful approach for describing and explaining complex issues in palliative care and end-of-life research. However, little is known about the use of this methodology in the field and the ways in which mixed methods studies have been reported. The purpose of this methodological review was to examine the characteristics, methodological features and reporting quality of mixed methods articles published in palliative care research. The authors screened all articles published in eight journals specialized in palliative care between January 2014 and April 2019. Those that reported a mixed methods study (n = 159) were included. The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) criteria were used to assess reporting quality. Findings showed that 57.9% of the identified studies used a convergent design and 82.4% mentioned complementarity as their main purpose for using a mixed methods approach. The reporting quality of the articles generally showed a need for improvement as authors usually did not describe the type of mixed methods design used and provided little detail on the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Based on the findings, recommendations are made to improve the quality of reporting of mixed methods articles in palliative care.

Keywords: end-of-life research; mixed methods research; palliative care research; qualitative research; quantitative research; reporting quality; research design.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.

References

    1. Farquhar M.C., Ewing G., Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat. Med. 2011;25:748–757. doi: 10.1177/0269216311417919.
    1. Walshe C. Mixed method research in palliative care. In: MacLeod R., Block V.D., editors. Textbook of Palliative Care. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2018.
    1. Fetters M.D. The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2020.
    1. Curry L., Nunez-Smith M. Mixed Methods in Health Sciences Research. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2015.
    1. Farquhar M.C., Preston N., Evans C.J., Grande G., Short V., Benalia H., Higginson I.J., Todd C. Mixed methods research in the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative and end-of-life care: Report in the MORECare consensus exercise. J. Palliat. Med. 2013;16:1550–1560. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0572.
    1. Flemming K., Adamson J., Atkin K. Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: The potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Palliat. Med. 2008;22:123–131. doi: 10.1177/0269216307087319.
    1. Seymour J. Combined qualitative and quantitative research designs. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care. 2012;6:514–524. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328358214e.
    1. Kaur N., Vedel I., El Sherif R., Pluye P. Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research. Fam. Pract. 2019;36:666–671. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz010.
    1. Hong Q.N., Pluye P. A conceptual framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2018;13:446–460. doi: 10.1177/1558689818770058.
    1. Wisdom J.P., Cavaleri M.A., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Green C.A. Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Serv. Res. 2012;47:721–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01344.x.
    1. Bishop F.L., Holmes M.M. Mixed methods in CAM research: A systematic review of studies published in 2012. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/187365.
    1. Granikov V., Hong Q.N., Crist E., Pluye P. Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 2020;42 doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003.
    1. O’Cathain A., Murphy E., Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2008;13:92–98. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074.
    1. Schreier M. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage; London, UK: 2012.
    1. Henoch I., Carlander I., Holm M., James I., Sarenmalm E.K., Hagelin C.L., Lind S., Sandgren A., Öhlén J. Palliative Care Research—A systematic review of foci, designs and methods of research conducted in Sweden between 2007 and 2012. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2016;30:5–21. doi: 10.1111/scs.12253.
    1. Van den Hurk D.G., Schellekens M.P., Molema J., Speckens A.E., van der Drift M.A. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for lung cancer patients and their partners: Results of a mixed methods pilot study. Palliat. Med. 2015;29:652–660. doi: 10.1177/0269216315572720.
    1. Van Scoy L.J., Watson-Martin E., Bohr T.A., Levi B.H., Green M.J. End-of-life conversation game increases confidence for having end-of-life conversations for chaplains-in-training. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care. 2018;35:592–600. doi: 10.1177/1049909117723619.
    1. Ankuda C.K., Kersting K., Guetterman T.C., Haefner J., Fonger E., Paletta M., Hopp F. What matters most? A mixed methods study of critical aspects of a home-based palliative program. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care. 2018;35:236–243. doi: 10.1177/1049909117691929.
    1. Plano Clark V.L., Ivankova N.V. Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2016.
    1. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2018.
    1. Fetters M.D., Curry L.A., Creswell J.W. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Serv. Res. 2013;48:2134–2156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
    1. Reese D.J., Beckwith S.K. Organizational barriers to cultural competence in hospice. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care. 2015;32:685–694. doi: 10.1177/1049909113520614.
    1. Kane P.M., Daveson B.A., Ryan K., Ellis-Smith C.I., Mahon N.G., McAdam B., McQuilllan R., Tracey C., Howley C., O’Gara G., et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. 2017;7:470–479. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001355.
    1. Myers J., Krueger P., Webster F., Downar J., Herx L., Jeney C., Oneschuk D., Schroder C., Sirianni G., Seccareccia D., et al. Development and validation of a set of palliative medicine entrustable professional activities: Findings from a mixed methods study. J. Palliat. Med. 2015;18:682–690. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0392.
    1. Taylor P., Johnson M., Dowding D.W. Clinical decision-making at the end of life: A mixed-methods study. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. 2018 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001535.
    1. Fryer C.S., Seaman E.L., Clark R.S., Plano Clark V. Mixed methods research in tobacco control with youth and young adults: A methodological review of current strategies. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183471.
    1. Hill H.C., Paley J., Forbat L. Observations of professional-patient relationships: A mixed-methods study exploring whether familiarity is a condition for nurses’ provision of psychosocial support. Palliat. Med. 2014;28:256–263. doi: 10.1177/0269216313499960.
    1. Boss R.D., Hutton N., Griffin P.L., Wieczorek B.H., Donohue P.K. Novel legislation for pediatric advance directives: Surveys and focus groups capture parent and clinician perspectives. Palliat. Med. 2015;29:346–353. doi: 10.1177/0269216315571020.
    1. Pype P., Mertens F., Wens J., Stes A., Van Den E., Deveugele M. Preparing palliative home care nurses to act as facilitators for physicians’ learning: Evaluation of a training programme. Palliat. Med. 2015;29:458–463. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560391.
    1. Kimbell B., Murray S.A., Byrne H., Baird A., Hayes P.C., MacGilchrist A., Finucane A., Brookes Y., O’Carroll R.E., Weir C.J., et al. Palliative care for people with advanced liver disease: A feasibility trial of a supportive care liver nurse specialist. Palliat. Med. 2018;32:919–929. doi: 10.1177/0269216318760441.
    1. Philip J., Crawford G., Brand C., Gold M., Miller B., Hudson P., Smallwood N., Lau R., Sundararajan V. A conceptual model: Redesigning how we provide palliative care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Palliat. Support. Care. 2018;16:452–460. doi: 10.1017/S147895151700044X.
    1. Whitehead P.B., Ramalingam N., Carter K.F., Katz K., Harden S. Nurse practitioners’ perspectives on the patient preferences about serious illness instrument. J. Hosp. Palliat. Nurs. 2016;18:332–341. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000256.
    1. Younas A., Pedersen M., Tayaben J. Review of mixed-methods research in nursing. Nurs. Res. 2019;68:464–472. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000372.
    1. Campbell J.T., Tam-Tham H., Dhaliwal K.K., Manns B.J., Hemmelgarn B.R., Sanmartin C., King-Shier K. Use of mixed methods research in research on coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension: A scoping review. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2017;10 doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003310.
    1. Brown K.M., Elliott S.J., Leatherdale S.T., Robertson-Wilson J. Searching for rigour in the reporting of mixed methods population health research: A methodological review. Health Educ. Res. 2015;30:811–839. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv046.
    1. Guetterman T.C., Fetters M.D., Creswell J.W. Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann. Fam. Med. 2015;13:554–561. doi: 10.1370/afm.1865.
    1. Tariq S., Woodman J. Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Rep. 2010;4 doi: 10.1177/2042533313479197.
    1. Leech N.L., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Combs J.P. Writing publishable mixed research articles: Guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approaches. 2011;5:7–24. doi: 10.5172/mra.2011.5.1.7.
    1. Fàbregues S., Molina-Azorin J.F. Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Qual. Quant. 2017;51:2847–2863. doi: 10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4.
    1. Jors K., Tietgen S., Xander C., Momm F., Becker G. Tidying rooms and tending hearts: An explorative, mixed-methods study of hospital cleaning staff’s experiences with seriously ill and dying patients. Palliat. Med. 2017;31:63–71. doi: 10.1177/0269216316648071.
    1. Zweers D., de Graaf E., Teunissen S. Suitable support for anxious hospice patients: What do nurses ‘know’, ‘do’ and ‘need’? An explanatory mixed method study. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. 2017 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001187.
    1. Knighting K., O’Brien M.R., Roe B., Gandy R., Lloyd-Williams M., Nolan M., Jack B.A. Development of the Carers’ Alert Thermometer (CAT) to identify family carers struggling with caring for someone dying at home: A mixed method consensus study. BMC Palliat. Care. 2015;14 doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0010-6.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir