Individual variation in contractile cost and recovery in a human skeletal muscle

M L Blei, K E Conley, I B Odderson, P C Esselman, M J Kushmerick, M L Blei, K E Conley, I B Odderson, P C Esselman, M J Kushmerick

Abstract

This study determined the variation among individuals in ATP use during contraction and ATP synthesis after stimulation in a human limb muscle. Muscle energetics were evaluated using a metabolic stress test that separates ATP utilization from synthesis by 31P NMR spectroscopy. Epicutaneous supramaximal twitch stimulation (1 Hz) of the median and ulnar nerves was applied in combination with ischemia of the finger and wrist flexors in eight normal subjects. The linear creatine phosphate (PCr) breakdown during ischemic stimulation defined ATP use (delta PCr per twitch or approximately P/twitch) and was highly reproducible as shown by the relative standard deviation [(standard deviation/mean) x 100] of 11% in three repeated measures. The time constant of the monoexponential PCr change during aerobic recovery represented ATP synthesis rate and also showed a low relative standard deviation (9%). Individuals were found to differ significantly in both mean approximately P/twitch (PCr breakdown rates, 0.29-0.45% PCr per sec or % PCr per twitch; ANOVA, p < 0.001) and in mean recovery time constants (41-74 sec; ANOVA, P < 0.001). This range of approximately P/twitch corresponded with the range of fiber types reported for a flexor muscle. In addition, approximately P/twitch was negatively correlated with a metabolite marker of slow-twitch fiber composition (Pi/ATP). The nearly 2-fold range of recovery time constants agreed with the range of mitochondrial volume densities found in human muscle biopsies. These results indicate that both components involved in the muscle energy balance--oxidative capacity and contractile costs--vary among individuals in human muscle and can be measured noninvasively by 31 P NMR.

References

    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Sep;69(3):1165-70
    1. Magn Reson Med. 1990 Mar;13(3):490-7
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 1;88(13):5714-8
    1. Am J Physiol. 1991 Dec;261(6 Pt 1):E737-41
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7521-5
    1. Am J Physiol. 1992 Sep;263(3 Pt 1):C598-606
    1. J Physiol. 1993 Jun;465:203-22
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6):Suppl:197-218
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Jan;79(1):147-66
    1. J Physiol. 1982 Nov;332:47-58
    1. Pflugers Arch. 1985 Apr;403(4):369-76
    1. J Biol Chem. 1987 Jul 5;262(19):9109-14
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jul;63(1):167-74
    1. Invest Radiol. 1987 Sep;22(9):741-6
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):8976-80
    1. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 25;263(18):9034-9
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Sep;67(3):926-32
    1. Am J Physiol. 1989 Dec;257(6 Pt 1):C1149-57
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Feb;68(2):644-9
    1. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1990;116:1-76

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir