Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study

COVIDSurg Collaborative

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction.

Methods: This international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20-60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04384926.

Findings: Of eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16-30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77-0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50-0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notification rates, moderate lockdowns (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80-0·88; p<0·001), and full lockdowns (0·57, 0·54-0·60; p<0·001), remained independently associated with non-operation. Surgery beyond 12 weeks from diagnosis in patients without neoadjuvant therapy increased during lockdowns (374 [9·1%] of 4521 in light restrictions, 317 [10·4%] of 3646 in moderate lockdowns, 2001 [23·8%] of 11 827 in full lockdowns), although there were no differences in resectability rates observed with longer delays.

Interpretation: Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients who were in regions with full lockdowns not undergoing planned surgery and experiencing longer preoperative delays. Although short-term oncological outcomes were not compromised in those selected for surgery, delays and non-operations might lead to long-term reductions in survival. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which might include protected elective surgical pathways and long-term investment in surge capacity for acute care during public health emergencies to protect elective staff and services.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, Medtronic, Sarcoma UK, The Urology Foundation, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests All authors declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of included patients *Found clinically, radiologically, or during surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of lockdowns on surgical capacity (A) Differences in resilience of surgical systems across income settings by COVID-19 stringency index group. Percentages represent proportion operated by group. (B) Kaplan-Meier plot demonstrating proportion of patients remaining non-operated over time from cancer diagnosis grouped by COVID-19 stringency index group. Plot censored at 28 weeks maximum follow-up from cancer diagnosis. Shading represents this represents the 95% CI, using the statistical package ggsurvplot.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model of factors associated with non-operation during COVID-19 19 832 in dataframe, 19 066 in model, 766 missing. 17 597 (91·8%) of 19 066 patients included in this model were operated by the end of follow-up. Missing data are described in the appendix (p 10), as well as the full model (p 12). ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. RCRI=Revised Cardiac Risk Index.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Lockdown and delay to surgery (A) Delay from diagnosis to surgery during lockdowns (according to COVID-19 stringency index group) by neoadjuvant therapy group. Percentages represent proportion of operated patients who were in each interval from diagnosis to operation group. (B) Weeks in full lockdown and interval from cancer diagnosis to operation. Plot displays patients who went straight to surgery (no neoadjuvant therapy only). Full lockdown defined as a COVID-19 stringency index score of more than 60. Plotted line represents a smoothed conditional mean from a fitted generalised additive model. The shaded area denotes bounds of the 95% CI.

References

    1. Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker) Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:529–538.
    1. Han E, Tan MMJ, Turk E. Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe. Lancet. 2020;396:1525–1534.
    1. Mansfield KE, Mathur R, Tazare J. Indirect acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e217–e230.
    1. Hamadani JD, Hasan MI, Baldi AJ. Immediate impact of stay-at-home orders to control COVID-19 transmission on socioeconomic conditions, food insecurity, mental health, and intimate partner violence in Bangladeshi women and their families: an interrupted time series. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1380–e1389.
    1. Chakrabarti S, Hamlet LC, Kaminsky J, Subramanian SV. Association of human mobility restrictions and race/ethnicity-based, sex-based, and income-based factors with inequities in well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4
    1. Haider N, Osman AY, Gadzekpo A. Lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 in nine sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1440–1449.
    1. Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, Glasbey JC. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396:27–38.
    1. Burki TK. Cancer guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:629–630.
    1. Nepogodiev D, Moore R, Biccard B. Prioritizing research for patients requiring surgery in low- and middle-income countries. Br J Surg. 2019;106:e113–e120.
    1. Sullivan R, Alatise OI, Anderson BO. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1193–1224.
    1. Sud A, Jones ME, Broggio J. Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1065–1074.
    1. Hanna TP, King WD, Thibodeau S. Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;371
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381.
    1. GlobalSurg Collaborative and National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries. Lancet. 2021;397:387–397.
    1. Roser M, Ritchie H, Ortiz-Ospina E, Hasell J. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) OurWorldInData.org2020.
    1. Mohanan M, Malani A, Krishnan K, Acharya A. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Karnataka, India. JAMA. 2021;325:1001–1003.
    1. Mwananyanda L, Gill CJ, MacLeod W. COVID-19 deaths in Africa: prospective systematic postmortem surveillance study. BMJ. 2021;372:n334.
    1. Kruk ME, Ling EJ, Bitton A. Building resilient health systems: a proposal for a resilience index. BMJ. 2017;357
    1. Glasbey JC, Bhangu A. Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international, multicenter, comparative cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;39:66–78.
    1. Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1749–1768.
    1. Lee LY, Cazier JB, Angelis V. COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1919–1926.
    1. Dietz JR, Moran MS, Isakoff SJ. Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;181:487–497.
    1. Farmer R, Mathur R, Bhaskaran K, Eastwood SV, Chaturvedi N, Smeeth L. Promises and pitfalls of electronic health record analysis. Diabetologia. 2018;61:1241–1248.
    1. Sud A, Torr B, Jones ME. Effect of delays in the 2-week-wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1035–1044.
    1. Kansagra AP, Goyal MS, Hamilton S, Albers GW. Collateral effect of COVID-19 on stroke evaluation in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:400–401.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir