Turning is an important marker of balance confidence and walking limitation in persons with multiple sclerosis

Gautam Adusumilli, Samantha Lancia, Victoria A Levasseur, Vaishak Amblee, Megan Orchard, Joanne M Wagner, Robert T Naismith, Gautam Adusumilli, Samantha Lancia, Victoria A Levasseur, Vaishak Amblee, Megan Orchard, Joanne M Wagner, Robert T Naismith

Abstract

The standard functional tool for gait assessment in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials has been the 25-Foot Timed Walk Test, a measure of gait speed. Straight-line gait assessment may not reflect adequately upon balance and coordination. Walking tests with turns may add additional information towards understanding gait and balance status, and be more reflective of ambulation in the community. Understanding the impact of turn parameters on patient-reported outcomes of balance and walking would help MS clinicians better formulate treatment plans for persons with gait limitations. In this study, ninety-one persons with MS (Expanded Disability Status Score; EDSS, range: 0-6.5) were enrolled in an initial cross-sectional study. Twenty-four subjects (EDSS, range:1.0-6.0) completed a follow-up visit an average of 12 months later. Spatiotemporal gait analysis was collected at both visits using APDM Opal wireless body-worn sensors while performing the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). For both cross-sectional and longitudinal data, regression analyses determined the impact on the addition of turning parameters to stride velocity (SV), in the prediction of self-reported balance confidence (Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)) and walking limitation (12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12)). The addition of 6MWT peak turn velocity (PTV) to 6MWT SV increased the predictive power of the 6MWT for the ABC from 20% to 33%, and increased the predictive power from 28% to 41% for the MSWS-12. TUG PTV added to TUG SV also strengthened the relationship of the TUG for the ABC from 19% to 28%, and 27% to 36% for the MSWS-12. For those with 1 year follow-up, percent change in turn number of steps (TNS%Δ) during the 6MWT added to 6MWT SV%Δ improved the modeling of ABC%Δ from 24% to 33%. 6MWT PTV%Δ added to 6MWT SV%Δ increased the predictive power of MSWS-12%Δ from 8% to 27%. Conclusively, turn parameters improved modeling of self-perceived balance confidence and walking limitations when added to the commonly utilized measure of gait speed. Tests of longer durations with multiple turns, as opposed to shorter durations with a single turn, modeled longitudinal change more accurately. Turn speed and stability should be qualitatively assessed during the clinic visit, and use of multi-faceted tests such as the TUG or 6MWT may be required to fully understand gait deterioration in persons with MS.

Conflict of interest statement

The following are the competing interests: Joanne Wagner (Acorda Therapeutics – stock; Greenwich Biosciences – salary, stock) and Robert Naismith (Consultant for Acorda, Alkermes, Biogen, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva). The funder did not provide support in the form of salaries for authors, and did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Clinical status change of ABC,…
Fig 1. Clinical status change of ABC, MSWS-12, stride velocity in 6MWT, stride velocity in TUG, and EDSS.
Longitudinal clinical status change in self-report balance confidence and walking limitation, stride velocity in a longer duration and shorter duration test, and clinical disability in 24 MS subjects.

References

    1. Kelleher KJ, Spence W, Solomonidis S, Apatsidis S. The characterisation of gait patterns of people with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2010; 32(15):1242–1250. doi:
    1. Balcer LJ. Clinical Outcome Measures for Research in Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2001; 21(4):296–301.
    1. Kalron Alon. Association between Gait Variability, Falls and Mobility in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Specific Observation on the EDSS 4.0–4.5 Level. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2017; 1–7.
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the Mcdonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69(2):292–302. doi:
    1. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995; 50A(1):M28–34
    1. Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. January 14 2003; 60(1):31–36.
    1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. November 1983; 33(11):1444–1452.
    1. Spain RI, St George RJ, Salarian A, Mancini M, Wagner JM, Horak FB, et al. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture. 2012; 35(4):573–578. doi:
    1. Mancini M, Horak FB. Potential of APDM mobility lab for the monitoring of the progression of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016; 13(5):455–462. doi:
    1. Washabaugh EP, Kalyanaraman T, Adamczyk PG, Claflin ES, Krishnan C. Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters. Gait Posture. 2017; 55:87–93 doi:
    1. Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010; 18(3):303–310. doi:
    1. Mancini M, King L, Salarian A, Holmstrom L, McNames J, Horak FB. Mobility Lab to assess balance and gait with synchronized body-worn sensors. J Bioeng Biomed Sci. 2011; Suppl 1:007.
    1. Feys P, Bibby B, Romberg A, Santoyo C, Gebara B, de Noordhout BM, et al. Within day variability on short and long walking tests in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. March 2014; 338(1–2):183–187. doi:
    1. Dalgas U, Kjolhede T, Gijbels D, Romberg A, Santoyo C, de Noordhout BM, et al. Aerobic intensity and pacing pattern during the six-minute walk test in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Med. January 2014; 46(1):59–66. doi:
    1. Mobility Lab User’s Guide. Portland: APDM, Inc; 2014.
    1. Motl RW, Putzki N, Pilutti LA, Cadavid D. Longitudinal changes in self-reported walking ability in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. May 2015; 10(5):e0125002 doi:
    1. Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Phys Ther. June 2008; 88(6):733–746. doi:
    1. Costelloe L, O’Rourke K, Kearney H, McGuigan C, Gribbin L, Duggan M, et al. The patient knows best: significant change in the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Aug 2007; 78(8):841–844.
    1. Cohen JA, Krishnan AV, Goodman AD, Potts J, Wang P, Havrdova E, et al. The clinical meaning of walking speed as measured by the timed 25-foot walk in patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. Nov 2014; 71(11):1386–1393.
    1. Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ; SCIRE Research Team. A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. April 2008; 46(4):246–254. doi:
    1. Bethoux F, Bennett S. Evaluating Walking in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care. 2011; 13(1):4–14. doi:
    1. Sebastião E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97(7):1072–1077 doi:
    1. Greene BR, Healy M, Rutledge S, Caulfield B, Tubridy N. Quantitative assessment of multiple sclerosis using inertial sensors and the TUG test. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, 2014.
    1. Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait Analysis Methods: An overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14(2):3362–3394.
    1. Sprint G, Cook D, Weeks D. Towards automating clinical assessments: a survey of the Timed Up and Go (TUG). IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2015; 8:64–77. doi:

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir