Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification

Gintaras Juodzbalys, Povilas Daugela, Gintaras Juodzbalys, Povilas Daugela

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of present article was to review impacted mandibular third molar aetiology, clinical anatomy, radiologic examination, surgical treatment and possible complications, as well as to create new mandibular third molar impaction and extraction difficulty degree classification based on anatomical and radiologic findings and literature review results.

Material and methods: Literature was selected through a search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases. The keywords used for search were mandibular third molar, impacted mandibular third molar, inferior alveolar nerve injury third molar, lingual nerve injury third molar. The search was restricted to English language articles, published from 1976 to April 2013. Additionally, a manual search in the major anatomy and oral surgery journals and books was performed. The publications there selected by including clinical and human anatomy studies.

Results: In total 75 literature sources were obtained and reviewed. Impacted mandibular third molar aetiology, clinical anatomy, radiographic examination, surgical extraction of and possible complications, classifications and risk factors were discussed. New mandibular third molar impaction and extraction difficulty degree classification based on anatomical and radiologic findings and literature review results was proposed.

Conclusions: The classification proposed here based on anatomical and radiological impacted mandibular third molar features is promising to be a helpful tool for impacted tooth assessment as well as for planning for surgical operation. Further clinical studies should be conducted for new classification validation and reliability evaluation.

Keywords: classification.; inferior alveolar nerve; lingual nerve injuries; mandibular canal; third molar; tooth impacted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A = Tooth No. 48 is classified as M1,R1,A2,C2,B1,S3 on the ortopantomograph. B = Impaction in horizontal spatial position index (S3) predicts complicated surgical extraction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A = On orthopantomograph close contact between impacted right mandibular third molar and mandibular canal is suspected. B = More detailed view on the CBCT images reveals tooth penetration through the mandibular canal wall (C2) and moderate risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Roots of tooth No. 48 are ≥ 3 mm away from the mandibular canal (C0) on the orthopantomograph. There is no risk to damage inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tooth No. 38, completely impacted in the mandibular ramus in distoangular position and classified as A3 and R3 according to the relation to alveolar crest and mandibular ramus, is noticed on the orthopantomograph. Complicated surgical extraction is anticipated.

References

    1. Archer WH. Oral Surgery: A Step-By-Step Atlas of Operative Techniques, 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1966. p. 507-10.
    1. Peterson LJ. Principles of Management of Impacted Teeth. In: Peterson LJ, Ellis E III, Hupp JR, Tuker MR, editors. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 215-48.
    1. Agarwal KN, Gupta R, Faridi MM, Kalra N. Permanent dentition in Delhi boys of age 5-14 years. Indian Pediatr. 2004 Oct;41(10):1031-5.
    1. Khan NB, Chohan AN, AlMograbi B, AlDeyab S, Zahid T, AlMoutairi M. Eruption Time of Permanent First Molars and Incisors Among a Sample of Saudi Male Schoolchildren. Saudi Dent J. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):18-24.
    1. Elsey MJ, Rock WP. Influence of orthodontic treatment on development of third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Aug;38(4):350-3.
    1. Pahkala R, Pahkala A, Laine T. Eruption pattern of permanent teeth in a rural community in northeastern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991 Dec;49(6):341-9.
    1. Odusanya SA, Abayomi IO. Third molar eruption among rural Nigerians. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Feb;71(2):151-4.
    1. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):150-5.
    1. Hattab FN, Alhaija ES. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar eruption space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Sep;88(3):285-91.
    1. Yuasa H, Sugiura M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and painbased on preoperative variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jun;42(3):209-14.
    1. Alling CC, Alling RD. Indications for management of impacted teeth. In: Alling CC, Helfrick JF, Alling RD, editors. Impacted Teeth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1993. p. 49-54.
    1. Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: a review. Am J Orthod. 1983 Feb;83(2):131-7.
    1. Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985 Apr;59(4):420-5.
    1. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585–99.
    1. Richardson M. Changes in lower third molar position in the young adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Oct;102(4):320-7.
    1. Richardson M. The development of third molar impaction. Br J Orthod. 1975 Oct;2(4):231-4.
    1. Odusanya SA. Third molar impaction among Nigerian youths. Odontostomatol Trop. 1984 Jun (2):79-83.
    1. Yamaoka M, Tambo A, Furusawa K. Incidence of inflammation in completely impacted lower third molars. Aust Dent J. 1997 Jun ;42 (3):153-5.
    1. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Concomitant occurrence of canine malposition and tooth agenesis: evidence of orofacial genetic fields. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Dec;122(6):657-60.
    1. Bermúdez de Castro JM. Third molar agenesis in human prehistoric populations of the Canary Islands. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Jun;79(2):207-15.
    1. Lytle JJ. Etiology and indications for the management of impacted teeth. Northwest Dent. 1995 Nov-Dec;74(6):23-32.
    1. Kay LW, Killey HC. The extraction of teeth. The impacted third molar. Dent Update. 1976 Mar-Apr;3(2):49-52.
    1. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 May;73(4):325.
    1. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Feb;28(1):20-5.
    1. Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK. Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod. 1992 Apr;18(4):161-5.
    1. vann der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Oct;136(10):1379-87.
    1. Kim IS, Kim SG, Kim YK, Kim JD. Position of the mental foramen in a Korean population: a clinical and radiographic study. Implant Dent. 2006 Dec;15(4):404-11.
    1. Misch CE. Diagnostic imaging techniques. In: Misch CE, editors. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 3rd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Company; 2008. p. 38-67.
    1. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK, American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, ad hoc Committee on Parameters of Care Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 May;91(5):498-511.
    1. Khan I, Halli R, Gadre P, Gadre KS. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and spiral CT scan in the preoperative assessment of intimacy of the inferior alveolar canal to impacted mandibular third molars. J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Mar;22(2):566-70.
    1. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Guidelines for the Identification of the Mandibular Vital Structures: Practical Clinical Applications of Anatomy and Radiological Examination Methods. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010;1(2):e1. URL: .
    1. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(8):834-9.Epub 2011 Apr 19.
    1. Matzen LH, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(1):98870341.Epub 2012 Aug 29.
    1. Removal of third molars. Sponsored by the National Institute of Dental Research, November 28-30, 1979. Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Summ. 1979;2:65-8. Review.
    1. Koerner KR. The removal of impacted third molars. Principles and procedures. Dent Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;38(2):255-78. Review.
    1. Bux P, Lisco V. Ectopic third molar associated with a dentigerous cyst in the subcondylar region: report of case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Jun;52(6):630-2.
    1. Medici A, Raho MT, Anghinoni M. Ectopic third molar in the condylar process: case report. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 2001;72(5-6):115-8.
    1. Wassouf A, Eyrich G, Lebeda R, Grätz KW. Surgical removal of a dislocated lower third molar from the condyle region: case report. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003;113(4):416-20.
    1. Nageshwar Comma incision for impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Dec;60(12):1506-9.
    1. Susarla SM, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D. Third molar surgery and associated complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2003 May;15(2):177-86.
    1. Pippi R, Perfetti G. Lingual displacement of an entire lower third molar. Report of a case with suggestions for prevention and management. Minerva Stomatol. 2002 Jun;51(6):263-8. English, Italian.
    1. Marciani RD. Complications of third molar surgery and their management. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;20(2):233-51.
    1. Kim JW, Cha IH, Kim SJ, Kim MR. Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Nov;70(11):2508-14. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
    1. Renton T, Yilmaz Z, Gaballah K. Evaluation of trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to third molar surgery in a prospective patient cohort. Recommendations for prevention. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;41(12):1509-18. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
    1. Leung YY, Cheung LK. Correlation of radiographic signs, inferior dental nerve exposure, and deficit in third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):1873-9. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
    1. Smith WP. The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):18-24. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
    1. Umar G, Obisesan O, Bryant C, Rood JP. Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the "high risk" third molar. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;51(4):353-7.Epub 2012 Sep 23.
    1. Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;43(1):7-12.
    1. Blackburn CW, Bramley PA. Lingual nerve damage associated with the removal of lower third molars. Br Dent J. 1989 Aug 5;167(3):103-7.
    1. Hillerup S, Stoltze K. Lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery I. Observations on recovery of sensation with spontaneous healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;36(10):884-9. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
    1. Zuniga JR. Management of third molar-related nerve injuries: observe or treat? Alpha Omegan. 2009 Jun;102(2):79-84.
    1. Janakiraman EN, Alexander M, Sanjay P. Prospective analysis of frequency and contributing factors of nerve injuries following third-molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 May;21(3):784-6.
    1. Lata J, Tiwari AK. Incidence of lingual nerve paraesthesia following mandibular third molar surgery. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;2(2):137-40.
    1. Alhassani AA, AlGhamdi AS. Inferior alveolar nerve injury in implant dentistry: diagnosis, causes, prevention, and management. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(5):401-7. Epub 2010 Jun 14. Review.
    1. Roy TS, Sarkar AK, Panicker HK. Variation in the origin of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anat. 2002 Mar;15(2):143-7.
    1. Ziccardi VB, Assael LA. Mechanisms of trigeminal nerve injuries. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;9(2):1-11.
    1. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;19(1):117-28, vii. Review.
    1. Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for inflammatory complications following third molar surgery in adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Nov;66(11):2213-8.
    1. Winter G.B. Impacted mandibular third molars. St Louis: American Medical Book Co.; 1926. p. 241–79.
    1. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest 1933;39:330–338.
    1. García AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Dec;38(6):585-587.
    1. Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):893-9.
    1. Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):2714-21. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
    1. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):771-4. Review.
    1. Carmichael FA, McGowan DA. Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Apr;30(2):78-82. Review.
    1. Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, Wong MC, Chan EK, Fok YH. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):320-6. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
    1. Hasegawa T, Ri S, Umeda M, Komori T. Multivariate relationships among risk factors and hypoesthesia of the lower lip after extraction of the mandibular third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jun;111(6):e1-7.
    1. Jun SH, Kim CH, Ahn JS, Padwa BL, Kwon JJ. Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;42(4):489-96. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
    1. Xu GZ, Yang C, Fan XD, Yu CQ, Cai XY, Wang Y, He D. Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Mar;141(3):271-8.
    1. Ueda M, Nakamori K, Shiratori K, Igarashi T, Sasaki T, Anbo N, Kaneko T, Suzuki N, Dehari H, Sonoda T, Hiratsuka H. Clinical significance of computed tomographic assessment and anatomic features of the inferior alveolar canal as risk factors for injury of the inferior alveolar nerve at third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;70(3):514-20. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
    1. Leung YY, Cheung LK. Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: an literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;40(1):1-10. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Review.
    1. Chossegros C, Guyot L, Cheynet F, Belloni D, Blanc JL. Is lingual nerve protection necessary for lower third molar germectomy? A prospective study of 300 procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Dec;31(6):620-4.
    1. Pogrel MA, Lee JS, Muff DF. Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Dec;62(12):1447-52.
    1. O'Riordan BC. Coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy of lower third molars). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Sep;98(3):274-80.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir