The Results of the "Positive Action for Today's Health" (PATH) Trial for Increasing Walking and Physical Activity in Underserved African-American Communities
Dawn K Wilson, M Lee Van Horn, E Rebekah Siceloff, Kassandra A Alia, Sara M St George, Hannah G Lawman, Nevelyn N Trumpeter, Sandra M Coulon, Sarah F Griffin, Abraham Wandersman, Brent Egan, Natalie Colabianchi, Melinda Forthofer, Barney Gadson, Dawn K Wilson, M Lee Van Horn, E Rebekah Siceloff, Kassandra A Alia, Sara M St George, Hannah G Lawman, Nevelyn N Trumpeter, Sandra M Coulon, Sarah F Griffin, Abraham Wandersman, Brent Egan, Natalie Colabianchi, Melinda Forthofer, Barney Gadson
Abstract
Background: The "Positive Action for Today's Health" (PATH) trial tested an environmental intervention to increase walking in underserved communities.
Methods: Three matched communities were randomized to a police-patrolled walking plus social marketing, a police-patrolled walking-only, or a no-walking intervention. The 24-month intervention addressed safety and access for physical activity (PA) and utilized social marketing to enhance environmental supports for PA. African-Americans (N=434; 62% females; aged 51±16 years) provided accelerometry and psychosocial measures at baseline and 12, 18, and 24 months. Walking attendance and trail use were obtained over 24 months.
Results: There were no significant differences across communities over 24 months for moderate-to-vigorous PA. Walking attendance in the social marketing community showed an increase from 40 to 400 walkers per month at 9 months and sustained ~200 walkers per month through 24 months. No change in attendance was observed in the walking-only community.
Conclusions: Findings support integrating social marketing strategies to increase walking in underserved African-Americans (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01025726).
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards Authors Wilson, Van Horn, Siceloff, Alia, St. George, Lawman, Trumpeter, Coulon, Griffin, Wandersman, Egan, Colabianchi, Forthofer, and Gadson declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study followed appropriate informed consent procedures and adhered to appropriate ethical standards and the Helsinki Declaration. This study was approved by the University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board.
Figures
Source: PubMed