Home telehealth and paediatric palliative care: clinician perceptions of what is stopping us?

Natalie K Bradford, Jeanine Young, Nigel R Armfield, Anthony Herbert, Anthony C Smith, Natalie K Bradford, Jeanine Young, Nigel R Armfield, Anthony Herbert, Anthony C Smith

Abstract

Background: Advances in technology have made the use of telehealth in the home setting a feasible option for palliative care clinicians to provide clinical care and support. However, despite being widely available and accessible, telehealth has still not been widely adopted either in Australia or internationally. The study aim was to investigate the barriers, enablers and perceived usefulness for an established home telehealth program in paediatric palliative care from the perspective of clinicians.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews (n = 10) were undertaken with palliative care clinicians in a tertiary paediatric hospital to identify attitudes to, satisfaction with, and perceived benefits and limitations of, home telehealth in palliative care. Iterative analysis was used to thematically analyse data and identify themes and core concepts from interviews.

Results: FOUR THEMES ARE REPORTED: managing relationships; expectations of clinicians; co-ordination, and the telehealth compromise. Core concepts that emerged from the data were the perceived ability to control clinical encounters in a virtual environment and the need to trust technology. These concepts help explain the telehealth compromise and low utilisation of the home telehealth program.

Conclusions: Effective communication between caregivers and clinicians is recognised as a core value of palliative care. Home telehealth has the potential to provide a solution to inequity of access to care, facilitate peer support and maintain continuity of care with families. However, significant limitations and challenges may impede its use. The virtual space creates additional challenges for communication, which clinicians and families may not intuitively understand. For home telehealth to be integrated into routine care, greater understanding of the nature of communication in the virtual space is required.

Keywords: Health service; Home care; Paediatric; Palliative care; Telehealth; Telehospice.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of consultation (n=405).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tag Cloud of word frequency from interviews.

References

    1. Australia National Broadband Network (NBN) .
    1. Cusack CM, Pan E, Hook JM, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Middleton B. The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(4):167–168.
    1. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):220.
    1. Oliver DR, Demiris G, Day M, Courtney KL, Porock D. Telehospice support for elder caregivers of hospice patients: two case studies. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(2):264–267.
    1. Washington KT, Demiris G, Oliver DP, Day M. Telehospice acceptance among providers: a multidisciplinary comparison. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25(6):452–457.
    1. Kinsella A. Telehospice and its use in home hospice care delivery today. Caring. 2005;24(11):54–57.
    1. Whitten P, Doolittle G, Mackert M. Providers’ acceptance of telehospice. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(4):730–735.
    1. Bradford N, Armfield NR, Young J, Smith AC. The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12(1):4.
    1. Bensink ME, Armfield NR, Pinkerton R, Irving H, Hallahan A, Theodoros D, Russell T, Barnett A, Scuffham P, Wootton R. Using videotelephony to support paediatric oncology-related palliative care in the home: from abandoned RCT to acceptability study. Palliat Med. 2009;23(3):228.
    1. Gagnon M-P, Lamothe L, Hebert M, Chanliau J, Fortin J-P. Telehomecare for vulnerable populations: The evaluation of new models of care. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(3):324–331.
    1. Whitten P, Holtz B, Meyer E, Nazione S. Telehospice: reasons for slow adoption in home hospice care. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(4):187–190.
    1. Wade V, Eliott J. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):490–492.
    1. Demiris G, Oliver DP, Courtney KL. Ethical considerations for the utilization of tele-health technologies in home and hospice care by the nursing profession. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30(1):56–66.
    1. Crowe L. Statewide Paediatric Palliative Care Education and Community Awareness Project. Brisbane: Royal Children’s Hospital and Health District Service; 2000.
    1. Bradford N, Herbert A, Walker R, Pedersen LA, Hallahan A, Irving H, Bensink ME, Armfield NR, Smith AC. Home telemedicine for paediatric palliative care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;161:10.
    1. Bradford N, Young J, Armfield NR, Bensink ME, Pedersen L-a, Herbert A, Smith AC. A pilot study of the effectiveness of home teleconsultations in paediatric palliative care. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):438–442.
    1. Cook DJ, Doolittle GC, Whitten PS. Administrator and provider perceptions of the factors relating to programme effectiveness in implementing telemedicine to provide end-of-life care. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(Suppl 2):17–19.
    1. Stern A. The complexity of family caregiving: use and perceptions of home telehealth in palliative cancer care (PhD Thesis) Canada: Mc Masters University; 2008.
    1. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13(1):3–21.
    1. Mason J. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2002.
    1. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications Limited; 2003.
    1. Wolff J, Robert R, Sommerer A, Volz-Fleckenstein M. Impact of a pediatric palliative care program. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54(2):279–283.
    1. Browning D. To show our humanness–relational and communicative competence in pediatric palliative care. Bioethics Forum. 2002;18(3–4):23–28.
    1. Wolfe J, Grier HE, Klar N, Levin SB, Ellenbogen JM, Salem-Schatz S, Emanuel EJ, Weeks JC. Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(5):326–333.
    1. Amarendran V, George A, Gersappe V, Krishnaswamy S, Warren C. The reliability of telepsychiatry for a neuropsychiatric assessment. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(3):223–225.
    1. Ontario Telemedicine Network. Telemedicine for mental healthcare. GP Psychotherapist. 2012;19(416):6.
    1. Myers K. Telepsychiatry: time to connect. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(3):217–219.
    1. Association of Children’s Palliative Care (ACT) A Guide to the Development of Children’s Palliative care Services. 3. Bristol UK: ACT; 2009.
    1. Goldman A, Hain R, Liben S. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children. Oxford: OUP; 2012.
    1. Nagel DA, Pomerleau SG, Penner JL. Knowing, caring, and telehealth technology “Going the Distance” in nursing practice. J Holist Nurs. 2012;31(2):104–112.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir