Women's income and risk of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania

Tanya Abramsky, Shelley Lees, Heidi Stöckl, Sheila Harvey, Imma Kapinga, Meghna Ranganathan, Gerry Mshana, Saidi Kapiga, Tanya Abramsky, Shelley Lees, Heidi Stöckl, Sheila Harvey, Imma Kapinga, Meghna Ranganathan, Gerry Mshana, Saidi Kapiga

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is pervasive throughout the world, with profound consequences for women's health. While women's 'economic empowerment' is touted as a potential means to reduce IPV, evidence is mixed as to the role of different economic factors in determining women's risk. This paper explores associations and potential pathways between women's income and experience of IPV, in Mwanza city, Tanzania.

Methods: We use data from married/cohabiting women (N = 740) enrolled in the MAISHA study, a cluster randomised trial of an IPV prevention intervention. Women were interviewed at baseline and 29-months later. We use logistic regression to model cross-sectional (baseline) and longitudinal associations between: a woman's monthly income (quartiles) and her past year risk of physical IPV, sexual IPV and economic abuse; and a woman's relative financial contribution to the household (same/less than partner; more than partner) and past year physical IPV and sexual IPV.

Results: At baseline, 96% of respondents reported earning an income and 28% contributed more financially to the household than their partner did. Higher income was associated with lower past-year physical IPV risk at baseline and longitudinally, and lower sexual IPV at baseline only. No clear associations were seen between income and economic abuse. Higher relative financial contribution was associated with increased physical IPV and sexual IPV among all women at baseline, though only among control women longitudinally. Higher income was associated with several potential pathways to reduced IPV, including reduced household hardship, fewer arguments over the partner's inability to provide for the family, improved relationship dynamics, and increased relationship dissolution. Those contributing more than their partner tended to come from more disadvantaged households, argue more over their partner's inability to provide, and have worse relationship dynamics.

Conclusions: While women's income was protective against IPV, women who contributed more financially than their partners had greater IPV risk. Poverty and tensions over men's inability to provide emerge as potentially important drivers of this association. Interventions to empower women should not only broaden women's access to economic resources and opportunities, but also work with women and men to address men's livelihoods, male gender roles and masculinity norms.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02592252 , registered retrospectively (13/08/2015).

Keywords: Africa; Economic abuse; Economic empowerment; Income; Intimate partner violence; Tanzania; Women.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework of the association between a woman’s income and past year experience of IPV

References

    1. Devries KM, Mak JY, Garcia-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, et al. Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–1528.
    1. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439.
    1. Jewkes RK, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai N. Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376(9734):41–48.
    1. Kouyoumdjian FG, Calzavara LM, Bondy SJ, O’Campo P, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, et al. Intimate partner violence is associated with incident HIV infection in women in Uganda. AIDS. 2013;27(8):1331–1338.
    1. Wathen CN, Macmillan HL. Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: impacts and interventions. Paediatr Child Health. 2013;18(8):419–422.
    1. Gibbs Andrew, Jacobson Jessica, Kerr Wilson Alice. A global comprehensive review of economic interventions to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV risk behaviours. Global Health Action. 2017;10(sup2):1290427.
    1. Vyas S, Watts C. How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income country settings?: a systematic review of published evidence. J Int Dev. 2008;21:577–602.
    1. Buller AM, Peterman A, Ranganathan M, Bleile A, Hidrobo M, Heise L. A mixed-method review of cash transfers and intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries. World Bank Res Obs. 2018;33(2):218–258.
    1. Ellsberg Mary, Arango Diana J, Morton Matthew, Gennari Floriza, Kiplesund Sveinung, Contreras Manuel, Watts Charlotte. Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say? The Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1555–1566.
    1. Fox GL, Benson ML, DeMaris AA, Van Wyk J. Economic distress and intimate violence: testing family stress and resources theories. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(3):793–807.
    1. Tauchen HV, Witte AD, Long SK. Domestic violence - a nonrandom affair. Int Econ Rev. 1991;32(2):491–511.
    1. Farmer A, Tiefenthaler J. An economic analysis of domestic violence. Rev Soc Econ. 1997;55(3):337–358.
    1. Peterman A, Palermo TM, Ferrari G. Still a leap of faith: microfinance initiatives for reduction of violence against women and children in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(6):e001143.
    1. Schuler SR, Hashemi SM, Riley AP, Akhter S. Credit programs, patriarchy and men's violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(12):1729–1742.
    1. Bates LM, Schuler SR, Islam F, Islam K. Socioeconomic factors and processes associated with domestic violence in rural Bangladesh. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30(4):190–199.
    1. Dalal K, Dahlstrom O, Timpka T. Interactions between microfinance programmes and non-economic empowerment of women associated with intimate partner violence in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e002941.
    1. Murshid NS, Akincigil A, Zippay A. Microfinance participation and domestic violence in Bangladesh: results from a nationally representative survey. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(9):1579–1596.
    1. Koenig MA, Ahmed S, Hossain MB, Khorshed Alam Mozumder AB. Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: individual- and community-level effects. Demography. 2003;40(2):269–288.
    1. Naved RT, Persson LA. Factors associated with spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plan. 2005;36(4):289–300.
    1. Bajracharya A, Amin S. Microcredit and domestic violence in Bangladesh: an exploration of selection bias influences. Demography. 2013;50(5):1819–1843.
    1. Ahmed SM. Intimate partner violence against women: experiences from a woman-focused development programme in Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005;23(1):95–101.
    1. Chin YM. Credit program participation and decline in violence: does self-selection matter? World Dev. 2012;40(8):1690–1699.
    1. Hadi A. Prevalence and correlates of the risk of marital sexual violence in Bangladesh. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(8):787–805.
    1. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, Morison LA, Phetla G, Watts C, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9551):1973–1983.
    1. Kim J, Ferrari G, Abramsky T, Watts C, Hargreaves J, Morison L, et al. Assessing the incremental effects of combining economic and health interventions: the IMAGE study in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(11):824–832.
    1. Gupta J, Falb KL, Lehmann H, Kpebo D, Xuan Z, Hossain M, et al. Gender norms and economic empowerment intervention to reduce intimate partner violence against women in rural cote d'Ivoire: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13(1):46.
    1. IRC . Getting down to business: women’s economic and social empowerment in Burundi. New York: International Rescue Committee; 2011.
    1. Bandiera O, Buehren N, Burgess R, Goldstein M, Gulesci S, Rasul I, et al. Empowering adolescent girls: evidence from a randomised control trial in Uganda. World Bank: Washington D.C; 2012.
    1. Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling domestic violence: a multicountry study. ORC Macro: Calverton, Maryland; 2004.
    1. Gage AJ, Thomas NJ. Women’s work, gender roles, and intimate partner violence in Nigeria. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(7):1923–1938.
    1. Krishnan S, Rocca CH, Hubbard AE, Subbiah K, Edmeades J, Padian NS. Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(1):136–143.
    1. Vyas S, Jansen HA, Heise L, Mbwambo J. Exploring the association between women’s access to economic resources and intimate partner violence in Dar es Salaam and Mbeya, Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 2015;146:307–315.
    1. Panda P, Agarwal B. Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Dev. 2005;33(5):823–850.
    1. Hadi A. Women’s productive role and marital violence in Bangladesh. J Fam Violence. 2005;20(3):181–189.
    1. Lenze J, Klasen S. Does Women’s labor force participation reduce domestic violence? Evidence from Jordan. Fem Econ. 2017;23(1):1–29.
    1. Hindin MJ, Adair LS. Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(8):1385–1399.
    1. Gram Lu, Morrison Joanna, Skordis-Worrall Jolene. Organising Concepts of ‘Women’s Empowerment’ for Measurement: A Typology. Social Indicators Research. 2018;143(3):1349–1376.
    1. Ranganathan M, Knight L, Abramsky T, Muvhango L, Polzer Ngwato T, Mbobelatsi M, et al. Associations between women’s economic and social empowerment and intimate partner violence: findings from a microfinance plus programme in rural North-West province, South Africa. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(7):1–29.
    1. Eswaran M, Malhotra N. Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence. Can J Econ. 2011;44(4):1222–1263.
    1. Hautzinger S. Researching men’s violence: personal reflections on ethnographic data. Men Masculinities. 2003;6(1):93–106.
    1. Heise L, Kotsadam A. Exploring cross-national and multi-level correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(6):332–340.
    1. Hidrobo M, Fernald L. Cash transfers and domestic violence. J Health Econ. 2013;32(1):304–319.
    1. Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:109.
    1. McCloskey LA. Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gend Soc. 1996;10(4):449–463.
    1. Macmillan R, Gartner R. When she brings home the bacon: labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1999;61(4):947–958.
    1. Atkinson MP, Greenstein TN, Lang MM. For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: gendered resource theory and wife abuse. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67(5):1137–1148.
    1. Harvey S, Lees S, Mshana G, Pilger D, Hansen C, Kapiga S, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact on intimate partner violence of a 10-session participatory gender training curriculum delivered to women taking part in a group-based microfinance loan scheme in Tanzania (MAISHA CRT01): study protocol. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):55.
    1. Watts C, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Garcia-Moreno C. Putting women’s safety first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.
    1. Ellsberg M, Heise L, Pena R, Agurto S, Winkvist A. Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Stud Fam Plan. 2001;32(1):1–16.
    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on Womens health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
    1. Stockl H, March L, Pallitto C, Garcia-Moreno C, WHOM-cS Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: prevalence and associated factors in nine countries: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:751.
    1. Ahmadabadi Z, Najman JM, Williams GM, Clavarino AM. Income, gender, and forms of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2017. 10.1177/0886260517719541.
    1. Rao V. Wife-beating in rural South India: a qualitative and econometric analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(8):1169–1180.
    1. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet. 2002;359(9315):1423–1429.
    1. Fulu E, Jewkes R, Roselli T, Garcia-Moreno C. UN multi-country cross-sectional study on men and violence research team. Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: findings from the UN multi-country cross-sectional study on men and violence in Asia and the pacific. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(4):e187–e207.
    1. Kapiga S, Harvey S, Mshana G, Hansen C, Mtolela G, Madaha F, et al. A social empowerment intervention to prevent intimate partner violence against women in a microfinance scheme in Tanzania: findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. In press.
    1. Abramsky T, Devries KM, Kiss L, Nakuti J, Kyegombe N, Starmann E, et al. Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and educe HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med. 2014;12(122). ()
    1. Wagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(1):e23–e33.
    1. Postmus JL, Hoge GL, Breckenridge J, Sharp-Jeffs N, Chung D. Economic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence: a multicountry review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018; 10.1177/1524838018764160.
    1. Krishnan S. Gender, caste, and economic inequalities and marital violence in rural South India. Health Care Women Int. 2005;26(1):87–99.
    1. Pleck JH. A new psychology of men. New York: Basic Books; 1995. Chapter: The gender role strain paradigm: an update; pp. 11–32.
    1. Vyas S. Maintaining respect - men, masculinities, and domestic violence against women: insights from informal sector workers in Tanzania. Int J Gend Stud Dev Soc. 2018;2(4):299–315.
    1. Howe LD, Galobardes B, Matijasevich A, Gordon D, Johnston D, Onwujekwe O, et al. Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):871–886.
    1. Vyas S. Estimating the assocation between women’s earnings and partner violence: evidence from the 2008–2009 Tanzania National Panel Survey. Washington DC: World Bank; 2013.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir