Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date?

Natalie Dabbas, K Adams, K Pearson, Gt Royle, Natalie Dabbas, K Adams, K Pearson, Gt Royle

Abstract

Objectives: Abdominal wall hernias are common. Various authors all quote the following order (in decreasing frequency): inguinal, femoral, umbilical followed by rarer forms. But are these figures outdated? We investigated the epidemiology of hernia repair (retrospective review) over 30 years to determine whether the relative frequencies of hernias are evolving.

Design: All hernia repairs undertaken in consecutive adult patients were assessed. Data included: patient demographics; hernia type; and operation details. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS.

Setting: A SINGLE UNITED KINGDOM HOSPITAL TRUST DURING THREE PERIODS: 1985-1988; 1995-1998; and 2005-2008.

Main outcome measures: Frequency data of different hernia types during three time periods, patient demographic data.

Results: Over the three time periods, 2389 patients underwent 2510 hernia repairs (i.e. including bilateral and multiple hernias in a single patient). Inguinal hernia repair was universally the commonest hernia repair, followed by umbilical, epigastric, para-umbilical, incisional and femoral, respectively. Whereas femoral hernia repair was the second commonest in the 1980s, it had become the fifth most common by 2005-2008. While the proportion of groin hernia repairs has decreased over time, the proportion of midline abdominal wall hernias has increased.

Conclusion: THE CURRENT RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF DIFFERENT HERNIA REPAIR TYPE IS: inguinal; umbilical; epigastric; incisional; para-umbilical; femoral; and finally other types e.g. spigelian. This contrasts with hernia incidence figures quoted in common reference books.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sites of external hernias
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph comparing study results to previously published hernia frequency

References

    1. Rains AJH, Capper WM Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery. 15th edn London: Lewis, 1971
    1. David C, Sabiston JR Davis-Christopher Textbook of Surgery. 12th edn London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 1981
    1. Kingsworth A, LeBlanc K Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003;362:1561–71
    1. MacFadyen BV, Mathis CR Inguinal herniorrhaphy: complications and recurrence. Semin Laparosc Surg 1994;1:128.
    1. Kurzer M, Kark AE, Wantz GE Surgical management of abdominal wall hernia. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 1999
    1. Office for National Statistics Ageing – Fastest Increase in the ‘Oldest Old’. London: ONS, 2010. See
    1. Townsend C, Beauchamp D, Evers M, Mattox KL, Sabiston DC Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The biological basis of modern surgical practice. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2001
    1. Russell RCG, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery. 23rd Edition London: Hodder Arnold, 2000
    1. Morris PJ, Malt RA Oxford Textbook of Surgery Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford University Press, 1994
    1. Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O'Connell PR Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery. 25th edn London: Hodder Arnold, 2008
    1. See
    1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ AtInguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:835–9
    1. Nelson M, Stephenson BM Adult groin hernias: acute and elective. Surgery 2003;21:28–34
    1. NHS Information Centre for health and social care Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England, 2006. Leeds: The Information Centre, 2006. See
    1. Farquharson EL Textbook of Operative Surgery. 5th edn London: Churchill Livingston, 1972
    1. Office for National Statistics. Fertility London: ONS, 2010. See
    1. Geer EB, Shen W Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance. Gend Med 2009;1 Suppl. 6:60–75
    1. Shi H, Clegg DJ Sex differences in the regulation of body weight. Physiol Behav 2009;97:199–204

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir