Effectiveness of SmartMoms, a Novel eHealth Intervention for Management of Gestational Weight Gain: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Leanne M Redman, L Anne Gilmore, Jeffrey Breaux, Diana M Thomas, Karen Elkind-Hirsch, Tiffany Stewart, Daniel S Hsia, Jeffrey Burton, John W Apolzan, Loren E Cain, Abby D Altazan, Shelly Ragusa, Heather Brady, Allison Davis, J Mick Tilford, Elizabeth F Sutton, Corby K Martin, Leanne M Redman, L Anne Gilmore, Jeffrey Breaux, Diana M Thomas, Karen Elkind-Hirsch, Tiffany Stewart, Daniel S Hsia, Jeffrey Burton, John W Apolzan, Loren E Cain, Abby D Altazan, Shelly Ragusa, Heather Brady, Allison Davis, J Mick Tilford, Elizabeth F Sutton, Corby K Martin

Abstract

Background: Two-thirds of pregnant women exceed gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations. Because excess GWG is associated with adverse outcomes for mother and child, development of scalable and cost-effective approaches to deliver intensive lifestyle programs during pregnancy is urgent.

Objective: The aim of this study was to decrease the proportion of women who exceed the Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 GWG guidelines.

Methods: In a parallel-arm randomized controlled trial, 54 pregnant women (age 18-40 years) who were overweight (n=25) or obese (n=29) were enrolled to test whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (called SmartMoms) decreased the proportion of women with excess GWG, defined as exceeding the 2009 IOM guidelines, compared to no intervention (usual care group). The SmartMoms intervention was delivered through mobile phone (remote group) or in a traditional in-person, clinic-based setting (in-person group), and included a personalized dietary intake prescription, self-monitoring weight against a personalized weight graph, activity tracking with a pedometer, receipt of health information, and continuous personalized feedback from counselors.

Results: A significantly smaller proportion of women exceeded the IOM 2009 GWG guidelines in the SmartMoms intervention groups (in-person: 56%, 10/18; remote: 58%, 11/19) compared to usual care (85%, 11/13; P=.02). The remote intervention was a lower cost to participants (mean US $97, SD $6 vs mean US $347, SD $40 per participant; P<.001) and clinics (US $215 vs US $419 per participant) and with increased intervention adherence (76.5% vs 60.8%; P=.049).

Conclusions: An intensive lifestyle intervention for GWG can be effectively delivered via a mobile phone, which is both cost-effective and scalable.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01610752; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01610752 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6sarNB4iW).

Keywords: gestational weight gain; intervention; lifestyle modification; pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Drs Redman, Martin, and Thomas developed the trademarked approach of SmartMoms (a registered trademark of the Louisiana State University System). There are no direct benefits to these authors for publication of this manuscript and they have no financial affiliations with the companies who conducted the work to develop the SmartMoms Virtual Weight Management Suite, although they could financially benefit from any licensing of SmartMoms along with LSU-Pennington Biomedical Research Center and Montclair State University. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

©Leanne M Redman, L. Anne Gilmore, Jeffrey Breaux, Diana M Thomas, Karen Elkind-Hirsch, Tiffany Stewart, Daniel S Hsia, Jeffrey Burton, John W Apolzan, Loren E Cain, Abby D Altazan, Shelly Ragusa, Heather Brady, Allison Davis, J. Mick Tilford, Elizabeth F Sutton, Corby K Martin. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 13.09.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean gestational weight gain (kg) for women in the usual care, remote, and in-person groups. The whiskers represent standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of women in the usual care, remote, and in-person groups who had appropriate and excess gestational weight gain (GWG) based on the IOM 2009 guidelines. *The SmartMoms intervention (in-person and remote groups combined) was effective at reducing GWG.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intervention adherence for the remote and in-person groups. The whiskers represent standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean intervention cost (US $) for participants and clinics for the remote and in-person groups. The whiskers represent standard error. The intervention cost incurred by the clinic was fixed.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines . In: Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
    1. Jensen M, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, Hu FB, Hubbard VS, Jakicic JM, Kushner RF, Loria CM, Millen BE, Nonas CA, Pi-Sunyer FX, Stevens J, Stevens VJ, Wadden TA, Wolfe BM, Yanovski SZ, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Obesity Society 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 01;63(25 Pt B):2985–3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004.
    1. Flynn A, Dalrymple K, Barr S, Poston L, Goff LM, Rogozińska E, van Poppel MN, Rayanagoudar G, Yeo S, Barakat CR, Perales M, Bogaerts A, Cecatti JG, Dodd J, Owens J, Devlieger R, Teede H, Haakstad L, Motahari-Tabari N, Tonstad S, Luoto R, Guelfi K, Petrella E, Phelan S, Scudeller TT, Hauner H, Renault K, Sagedal LR, Stafne SN, Vinter C, Astrup A, Geiker NR, McAuliffe FM, Mol BW, Thangaratinam S, i-WIP (International Weight Management in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group Dietary interventions in overweight and obese pregnant women: a systematic review of the content, delivery, and outcomes of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2016 May;74(5):312–328. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw005.
    1. Oteng-Ntim E, Varma R, Croker H, Poston L, Doyle P. Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2012 May 10;10:47. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-47.
    1. Childbirth Connection How Do US Women Use the Internet and Other Sources of Pregnancy Information? A Listening to Mothers III Data Brief. 2016. [2017-08-30]. .
    1. ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice ACOG Committee opinion. Number 267, January 2002: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;99(1):171–173.
    1. Sutton E, Cain LE, Vallo PM, Redman LM. Strategies for successful recruitment of pregnant patients into clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):554–559. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001900.
    1. Pieper C, Redman L, Racette S, Roberts S, Bhapkar M, Rochon J, Martin C, Kraus W, Das S, Williamson D, Ravussin E. Development of adherence metrics for caloric restriction interventions. Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):155–164. doi: 10.1177/1740774511398369.
    1. Thomas DM, Ciesla A, Levine JA, Stevens JG, Martin CK. A mathematical model of weight change with adaptation. Math Biosci Eng. 2009 Oct;6(4):873–887.
    1. Thomas D, Das SK, Levine JA, Martin CK, Mayer L, McDougall A, Strauss BJ, Heymsfield SB. New fat free mass - fat mass model for use in physiological energy balance equations. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2010 May 09;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-39.
    1. Thomas DM, Martin CK, Heymsfield S, Redman LM, Schoeller DA, Levine JA. A simple model predicting individual weight change in humans. J Biol Dyn. 2011 Nov;5(6):579–599. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2010.508541.
    1. Thomas DM, Schoeller DA, Redman LA, Martin CK, Levine JA, Heymsfield SB. A computational model to determine energy intake during weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Dec;92(6):1326–1331. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29687.
    1. Thomas DM, Navarro-Barrientos JE, Rivera DE, Heymsfield SB, Bredlau C, Redman LM, Martin CK, Lederman SA, Butte NF. Dynamic energy-balance model predicting gestational weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jan;95(1):115–122. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024307.
    1. Martin C, Gilmore LA, Apolzan JW, Myers CA, Thomas DM, Redman LM. Smartloss: a personalized mobile health intervention for weight management and health promotion. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Mar 16;4(1):e18. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5027.
    1. Hill J, Peters JC, Wyatt HR. Using the energy gap to address obesity: a commentary. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Nov;109(11):1848–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.08.007.
    1. Gilmore LA, Redman LM. Weight gain in pregnancy and application of the 2009 IOM guidelines: toward a uniform approach. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015 Mar;23(3):507–511. doi: 10.1002/oby.20951. doi: 10.1002/oby.20951.
    1. Dodd J, Grivell RM, Crowther CA, Robinson JS. Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG. 2010 Oct;117(11):1316–1326. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02540.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02540.x.
    1. Kinnunen TI, Pasanen M, Aittasalo M, Fogelholm M, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Weiderpass E, Luoto R. Preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy - a controlled trial in primary health care. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jul;61(7):884–891. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602602.
    1. Vesco K, Karanja N, King JC, Gillman MW, Leo MC, Perrin N, McEvoy CT, Eckhardt CL, Smith KS, Stevens VJ. Efficacy of a group-based dietary intervention for limiting gestational weight gain among obese women: a randomized trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014 Sep;22(9):1989–1996. doi: 10.1002/oby.20831. doi: 10.1002/oby.20831.
    1. Kim LP, Koleilat M, Whaley SE. A qualitative study to examine perceptions and barriers to appropriate gestational weight gain among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infants and Children Program. J Pregnancy. 2016;2016:4569742. doi: 10.1155/2016/4569742. doi: 10.1155/2016/4569742.
    1. Benton S. Hospitals and Health Networks. 2016. Mar 3, [2017-08-11]. Four reasons why telemedicine can improve patient engagement .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir