Optimal strategy of switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in Chinese acute coronary syndrome patients with complicated coronary artery disease: the switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor (SHIFT-CACS) study

Ying Yao, Ping Wang, Xiao-Zeng Wang, Xin Zhao, Wei Zhao, Tie-Nan Zhou, Lei Zhang, Ying Yao, Ping Wang, Xiao-Zeng Wang, Xin Zhao, Wei Zhao, Tie-Nan Zhou, Lei Zhang

Abstract

Background: The dose and time point for switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor remain controversial, especially for Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with complicated coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, the purpose of this study was to further explore the optimal dose and time point for the switching strategy to balance the increase in platelet inhibition and the decrease in adverse events in Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: From July 2017 to December 2017, the prospective, randomized, open-label study (the SwitcHIng from clopidogrel to ticagrelor study) assigned the eligible Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI (n = 102) for 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h (T-90 mg-12 h), 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h (T-90 mg-24h) or 180 mg ticagrelor at 24 h (T-180 mg-24 h) after the last dose of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the comparison of maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) values at 2 h after switching strategies among the three groups. In addition, the MPA values at baseline, 8 h and before discharge and the rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were evaluated, the incidences of bleeding episodes and dyspnea during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up in our study were also recorded. The MPA was measured by light transmittance aggregometry in our study. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model and one-way ANOVA were used to compare data for the primary endpoint.

Results: The MPA values were significantly decreased in the T-180 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group (P = 0.017) and decreased numerically compared with the T-90 mg-24 h group (P = 0.072) at 2 h. In particular, the MPA values were markedly reduced in the T-90 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group at 8 h after switching treatment (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference among the three groups in all bleedings and dyspnea events.

Conclusions: The optimal treatment strategy recommended in this study for Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI is 180 or 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last dose of clopidogrel. In addition, a negative interaction was detected in this study between the overlap for clopidogrel and ticagrelor at 12 h after the last dose of clopidogrel.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03577652; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03577652.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and patient disposition. (A) Adverse events include bleeding episodes and dyspnea. The MPA was measured by light transmittance aggregometry. Baseline values were measured while on clopidogrel maintenance therapy. Before discharge values were measured at 2 h after the last dose of ticagrelor during hospital. (B) Patient disposition. In total, 102 patients of the intention-to-treat analysis population formed the efficacy and safety endpoint cohorts. T-90 mg-12 h: Maintenance dose of 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h after the last clopidogrel treatment; T-90 mg-24 h: Maintenance dose of 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last clopidogrel treatment; T-180 mg-24 h: Loading dose of 180 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last clopidogrel treatment. ACS: Acute coronary syndrome; MPA: Maximal platelet aggregation; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; R∗: Randomization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmacodynamic comparisons among groups. Comparisons of mean maximal platelet aggregation measured by light transmittance aggregometry among groups after switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor therapy. Data were shown as the mean ± SE. Baseline values were measured while on clopidogrel maintenance therapy. Before discharge values were measured at 2 h after the last dose of ticagrelor during hospital. The P∗ value denoted the T-90 mg-12 h group comparing with the T-180 mg-24 h group at 2 h after switching strategies; the P† value denoted the T-90 mg-12 h group comparing with the T-90 mg-24 h group at 8 h after switching strategies; The P‡ value denoted the T-90 mg-12 h group comparing with the T-180 mg-24 h group at 8 h after switching strategies. MPA: Maximal platelet aggregation; SE: Standard error; T-90 mg-12 h: Maintenance dose of 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h after the last clopidogrel treatment; T-90 mg-24 h: Maintenance dose of 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last clopidogrel treatment; T-180 mg-24 h: Loading dose of 180 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last clopidogrel treatment.

References

    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018; 39:213–260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
    1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152:1243–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044.
    1. Magro M, Nauta S, Simsek C, Onuma Y, Garg S, van der Heide E, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the MI SYNTAX score study. Am Heart J 2011; 161:771–781. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.004.
    1. Savonitto S, Morici N, Franco N, Misuraca L, Lenatti L, Ferri LA, et al. Age at menopause, extent of coronary artery disease and outcome among postmenopausal women with acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol 2018; 259:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.065.
    1. Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Lansky A, Mehran R, et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2389–2397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.032.
    1. Danielak D, Karaźniewicz-Łada M, Główka F. Ticagrelor in modern cardiology-an up-to-date review of most important aspects of ticagrelor pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:103–112. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1421634.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Tantry US, Gesheff T, Wei C, et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation 2009; 120:2577–2585. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.912550.
    1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1045–1057. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327.
    1. Kotsia A, Brilakis ES, Held C, Cannon C, Steg GP, Meier B, et al. Extent of coronary artery disease and outcomes after ticagrelor administration in patients with an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the PLATelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Am Heart J 2014; 168:68–5e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.001.
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40:87–165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
    1. Becker RC, Bassand JP, Budaj A, Wojdyla DM, James SK, Cornel JH, et al. Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32:2933–2944. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr422.
    1. Storey RF, Becker RC, Harrington RA, Husted S, James SK, Cools F, et al. Characterization of dyspnoea in PLATO study patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel and its association with clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 2011; 32:2945–2953. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr231.
    1. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Deftereos S, Sitafidis G, Kanakakis I, Hamilos M, et al. In-hospital switching of oral P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prevalence, predictors and short-term outcome. Am Heart J 2014; 167:68–76.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.010.
    1. General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent 2014; 81:14–18.
    1. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005; 1:219–227.
    1. Cattaneo M. Light transmission aggregometry and ATP release for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35:158–167. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220324.
    1. Franchi F, Rollini F, Rivas Rios J, Rivas A, Agarwal M, Kureti M, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease: results of the SWAP-4 study. Circulation 2018; 137:2450–2462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033983.
    1. Gurbel PA, Gesheff MG, Franzese CJ, Bliden KP, Tantry US. Is light transmittance aggregometry still a useful tool to assess pharmacodynamic effects of antiplatelet therapy? Platelets 2015; 26:608–609. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.920497.
    1. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, Price MJ, Jeong YH, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:2261–2273. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101.
    1. Gurbel PA, Antonino MJ, Bliden KP, Dichiara J, Suarez TA, Singla A, et al. Platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate and long-term ischemic event occurrence following percutaneous coronary intervention: a potential antiplatelet therapeutic target. Platelets 2008; 19:595–604. doi: 10.1080/09537100802351065.
    1. Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, et al. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial, phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987; 76:142–154. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.142.
    1. Hicks KA, Stockbridge NL, Targum SL, Temple RJ. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium consensus report: the food and drug administration perspective. Circulation 2011; 123:2664–2665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032433.
    1. Lindholm D, Storey RF, Christersson C, Halvorsen S, Grove EL, Braun OÖ, et al. Design and rationale of TROCADERO: a trial of caffeine to alleviate dyspnea related to ticagrelor. Am Heart J 2015; 170:465–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.014.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Antonino MJ, Wei C, Teng R, et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study. Circulation 2010; 121:1188–1199. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.919456.
    1. Caiazzo G, De Rosa S, Torella D, Spaccarotella C, Mongiardo A, Giampà S, et al. Administration of a loading dose has no additive effect on platelet aggregation during the switch from ongoing clopidogrel treatment to ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:104–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000512.
    1. Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, Bhatt DL, James S, Schneider DJ, et al. International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies. Circulation 2017; 136:1955–1975. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164.
    1. Misumida N, Aoi S, Kim SM, Ziada KM, Abdel-Latif A. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017; 19:689–694. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.009.
    1. Kang HJ, Clare RM, Gao R, Held C, Himmelmann A, James SK, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective analysis from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Am Heart J 2015; 169:899–950. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.015.
    1. Li J, Li X, Wang Q, Hu S, Wang Y, Masoudi FA, et al. Retraction and republication--ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data. Lancet 2015; 385:402.doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62216-9.
    1. Teng R, Butler K. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single and multiple doses of ticagrelor in Japanese and Caucasian volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 52:478–491. doi: 10.5414/CP202017.
    1. Levine GN, Jeong YH, Goto S, Anderson JL, Huo Y, Mega JL, et al. Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014; 11:597–606. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.104.
    1. Lordkipanidzé M, Pharand C, Nguyen TA, Schampaert E, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. Comparison of four tests to assess inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2877–2885. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn419.
    1. Lenk E, Spannagl M. Platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy. EJIFCC 2013; 24:90–96.
    1. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Oude Ophuis T, Steg PG, Storey R, Cohen M, et al. Long-term tolerability of ticagrelor for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events: a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1:425–432. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1017.
    1. Lee YJ, Kim H, Choi J, Lee BH, Lee SY. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data of low-dose ticagrelor versus standard dose in East Asians: a systematic review. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14:83–93. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S152276.
    1. Hibbert B, Maze R, Pourdjabbar A, Simard T, Ramirez FD, Moudgil R, et al. A comparative pharmacodynamic study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAPITAL RELOAD study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e92078.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092078.
    1. Cattaneo M. Switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor: tips and tricks. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:2731–2733. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw103.
    1. VAN Giezen JJ, Nilsson L, Berntsson P, Wissing BM, Giordanetto F, Tomlinson W, et al. Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y(12) independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7:1556–1565. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03527.x.
    1. Hoffmann K, Lutz DA, Straßburger J, Baqi Y, Müller CE, von Kügelgen I. Competitive mode and site of interaction of ticagrelor at the human platelet P2Y12-receptor. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12:1898–1905. doi: 10.1111/jth.12719.
    1. Zhang K, Zhang J, Gao ZG, Zhang D, Zhu L, Han GW, et al. Structure of the human P2Y12 receptor in complex with an antithrombotic drug. Nature 2014; 509:115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature13083.
    1. Pourdjabbar A, Hibbert B, Chong AY, Le May MR, Labinaz M, Simard TA, et al. A randomised study for optimising crossover from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The CAPITAL OPTI-CROSS study. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117:303–310. doi: 10.1160/TH16-04-0340.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K, Cho PW, Zaman KA, Kreutz RP, et al. Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1820–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.041.
    1. Guan H, Wang Y. School of Economics, Shenyang University. Correlation degree and difference between consumption and actual income of urban and rural residents in liaoning: based on analysis of cointegration and ECM model. J Shenyang Univ 2017; 19:151–157. doi: 10.16103/j.cnki.21-1582/c.2017.02.006.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir