Body mass index and health status in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Trial (BARI 2D)

Sheng-Chia Chung, Mark A Hlatky, Roslyn A Stone, Jamal S Rana, Jorge Escobedo, William J Rogers, Joyce T Bromberger, Sheryl F Kelsey, Maria Mori Brooks, Sheng-Chia Chung, Mark A Hlatky, Roslyn A Stone, Jamal S Rana, Jorge Escobedo, William J Rogers, Joyce T Bromberger, Sheryl F Kelsey, Maria Mori Brooks

Abstract

Background: The longitudinal association between obesity, weight variability, and health status outcomes is important for patients with coronary disease and diabetes.

Methods: The BARI 2D was a multicenter randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate treatment strategies for patients with both documented stable ischemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes. We examined BARI 2D participants for 4 years to study how body mass index (BMI) was associated with health status outcomes. Health status was evaluated by the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), RAND Energy/fatigue, Health Distress, and Self-rated Health. Body mass index was measured quarterly throughout follow-up years, and health status was assessed at each annual follow-up visit. Variation in BMI measures was separated into between-person and within-person change in longitudinal analysis.

Results: Higher mean BMI during follow-up years (the between-person BMI) was associated with poorer health status outcomes. Decreasing BMI (the within-person BMI change) was associated with better Self-rated health. The relationships between BMI variability and DASI or Energy appeared to be curvilinear and differed by baseline obesity status. Decreasing BMI was associated with better outcomes if patients were obese at baseline but was associated with poorer DASI and Energy outcomes if patients were nonobese at baseline.

Conclusions: For patients with stable ischemic heart disease and diabetes, weight gain was associated with poorer health status outcomes, independent of obesity-related comorbidities. Weight reduction is associated with better functional capacity and perceived energy for obese patients but not for nonobese patients at baseline.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00006305.

Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean health status by baseline obesity status. *Points indicate mean scores in each group. Obese (BMI ≥ 30) (solid symbol: ■ and solid line: –––––); non-obese (BMI

Figure 2

Lowess smooth of DASI by…

Figure 2

Lowess smooth of DASI by BMI at year 1 and at year 4;…

Figure 2
Lowess smooth of DASI by BMI at year 1 and at year 4; DASI by between-person and within-person BMI change at year 1.

Figure 3

Interpretation of averaged association of…

Figure 3

Interpretation of averaged association of follow-up BMI and health status outcomes. *Assume mean…

Figure 3
Interpretation of averaged association of follow-up BMI and health status outcomes. *Assume mean follow-up BMI is 35 for participant who were obese at baseline, and 25 for participants who were non-obese at baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lowess smooth of DASI by BMI at year 1 and at year 4; DASI by between-person and within-person BMI change at year 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interpretation of averaged association of follow-up BMI and health status outcomes. *Assume mean follow-up BMI is 35 for participant who were obese at baseline, and 25 for participants who were non-obese at baseline.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir