MRI assessment of suppression of structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving rituximab: results from the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind RA-SCORE study

Charles Peterfy, Paul Emery, Paul P Tak, Mikkel Østergaard, Julie DiCarlo, Kati Otsa, Federico Navarro Sarabia, Karel Pavelka, Marie-Agnes Bagnard, Lykke Hinsch Gylvin, Corrado Bernasconi, Annarita Gabriele, Charles Peterfy, Paul Emery, Paul P Tak, Mikkel Østergaard, Julie DiCarlo, Kati Otsa, Federico Navarro Sarabia, Karel Pavelka, Marie-Agnes Bagnard, Lykke Hinsch Gylvin, Corrado Bernasconi, Annarita Gabriele

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in structural damage and joint inflammation assessed by MRI following rituximab treatment in a Phase 3 study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) who were naive to biological therapy.

Methods: Patients were randomised to receive two infusions of placebo (n=63), rituximab 500 mg (n=62), or rituximab 1000 mg (n=60) intravenously on days 1 and 15. MRI scans and radiographs of the most inflamed hand and wrist were acquired at baseline, weeks 12 (MRI only), 24 and 52. The primary end point was the change in MRI erosion score from baseline at week 24.

Results: Patients treated with rituximab demonstrated significantly less progression in the mean MRI erosion score compared with those treated with placebo at weeks 24 (0.47, 0.18 and 1.60, respectively, p=0.003 and p=0.001 for the two rituximab doses vs placebo) and 52 (-0.30, 0.11 and 3.02, respectively; p<0.001 and p<0.001). Cartilage loss at 52 weeks was significantly reduced in the rituximab group compared with the placebo group. Other secondary end points of synovitis and osteitis improved significantly with rituximab compared with placebo as early as 12 weeks and improved further at weeks 24 and 52.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that rituximab significantly reduced erosion and cartilage loss at week 24 and week 52 in MTX-inadequate responder patients with active RA, suggesting that MRI is a valuable tool for assessing inflammatory and structural damage in patients with established RA receiving rituximab.

Trial registration number: NCT00578305.

Keywords: DMARDs (biologic); Inflammation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary end point. (A) Mean change in rheumatoid arthritis MRI Scoring (RAMRIS) erosion score (intent-to-treat (ITT) population). Missing values were imputed using linear extrapolation. Error bars represent the SE of the mean. (B) Cumulative distribution of change in RAMRIS erosion score at week 24. Missing values were imputed using linear extrapolation, ITT population. Broken horizontal lines represent ±SDC (smallest detectable change, determined according to the method of Bruynesteyn, et al. SDCs were 1.88 for RAMRIS erosion score, 1.54 for CARLOS, 2.11 for RAMRIS osteitis score and 1.56 for RAMRIS synovitis score).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean changes in rheumatoid arthritis MRI Scoring (RAMRIS) synovitis, RAMRIS osteitis and MRI cartilage loss score (CARLOS) (intent-to-treat population). (A) Synovitis. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward. Error bars represent the SE of the mean. (B) Osteitis. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward. Error bars represent the SE of the mean. (C) Cartilage loss. Error bars represent the SE of the mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean change in total damage and total inflammation scores. (A) Total damage score. Total damage score=erosion score+(2.5×cartilage loss score). Missing values were imputed using linear extrapolation using baseline and week 12 images. Error bars represent the SE of the mean. (B) Total inflammation score. Total inflammation score=osteitis score+(3×synovitis score). Missing values were imputed using linear extrapolation using baseline and week 12 images. Error bars represent the SE of the mean.

References

    1. Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Ostergaard M, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:804–14.
    1. Cohen SB, Keystone E, Genovese MC, et al. . Continued inhibition of structural damage over 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab in combination with methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1158–61.
    1. Tak PP, Rigby W, Rubbert-Roth A, et al. . Sustained inhibition of progressive joint damage with rituximab plus methotrexate in early active rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the randomised controlled trial IMAGE. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:351–7.
    1. Landewe RB, Boers M, Verhoeven AC, et al. . COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:347–56.
    1. Keystone EC, Cohen SB, Emery P, et al. . Multiple courses of rituximab produce sustained clinical and radiographic efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: 5-year data from the REFLEX study. J Rheumatol 2012;39:2238–46.
    1. Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, et al. . OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1385–6.
    1. American College of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials Task Force Imaging Group and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Inflammatory Arthritis Working Group. Review: The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing structural damage in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:2513–23.
    1. Tan YK, Conaghan PG. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011;25:569–84.
    1. van de Sande MG, van der Leij C, Lavini C, et al. . Characteristics of synovial inflammation in early arthritis analysed by pixel-by-pixel time-intensity curve shape analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1240–5.
    1. Keystone E, Emery P, Peterfy CG, et al. . Rituximab inhibits structural joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:216–21.
    1. Peterfy CG, Olech E, Dicarlo JC, et al. . Monitoring cartilage loss in the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis with magnetic resonance imaging in a multi-center clinical trial: IMPRESS (NCT00425932). Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:R44.
    1. Genovese MC, Kavanaugh A, Weinblatt ME, et al. . An oral syk kinase inhibitor in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a three-month randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis that did not respond to biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:337–45.
    1. Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg BJ, et al. . Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3860–7.
    1. Ejbjerg B, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, et al. . The sensitivity to change for destructive joint damage by the Sharp/van der Heijde x-ray scores and 2 different MRI approaches. Arthritis Rheum 2003;50(Suppl 9):5172.
    1. Peterfy CG, DiCarlo JC, Olech E, et al. . Evaluating joint-space narrowing and cartilage loss in rheumatoid arthritis by using MRI. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:R131.
    1. Genant HK. Methods of assessing radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med 1983;75:35–47.
    1. Peterfy C, Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG. MRI comes of age in RA clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:794–6.
    1. Rubbert-Roth A, Tak PP, Zerbini C, et al. . Efficacy and safety of various repeat treatment dosing regimens of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase III randomized study (MIRROR). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1683–93.
    1. Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, et al. . The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1390–400.
    1. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. . Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2793–806.
    1. Boumans MJ, Thurlings RM, Yeo L, et al. . Rituximab abrogates joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:108–13.
    1. Smolen JS, van der Heijde DM, Aletaha D, et al. . Progression of radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: Independence of erosions and joint space narrowing. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1535–40.
    1. Cohen SB, Dore RK, Lane NE, et al. . Denosumab treatment effects on structural damage, bone mineral density, and bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:1299–309.
    1. Bruynesteyn K, Boers M, Kostense P, et al. . Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:179–82.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir