An Evaluation of the Design and Usability of a Novel Robotic Bilateral Arm Rehabilitation Device for Patients with Stroke

Yu-Cheng Pei, Jean-Lon Chen, Alice M K Wong, Kevin C Tseng, Yu-Cheng Pei, Jean-Lon Chen, Alice M K Wong, Kevin C Tseng

Abstract

Study design: Case series.

Evidence level: IV (case series).

Introduction: Robot-assisted therapy for upper limb rehabilitation is an emerging research topic and its design process must integrate engineering, neurological pathophysiology, and clinical needs.

Purpose of the study: This study developed/evaluated the usefulness of a novel rehabilitation device, the MirrorPath, designed for the upper limb rehabilitation of patients with hemiplegic stroke.

Methods: The process follows Tseng's methodology for innovative product design and development, namely two stages, device development and usability assessment. During the development process, the design was guided by patients' rehabilitation needs as defined by patients and their therapists. The design applied synchronic movement of the bilateral upper limbs, an approach that is compatible with the bilateral movement therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation theories. MirrorPath consists of a robotic device that guides upper limb movement linked to a control module containing software controlling the robotic movement.

Results: Five healthy subjects were recruited in the pretest, and 4 patients, 4 caregivers, and 4 therapists were recruited in the formal test for usability. All recruited subjects were allocated to the test group, completed the evaluation, and their data were all analyzed. The total system usability scale score obtained from the patients, caregivers, and therapists was 71.8 ± 11.9, indicating a high level of usability and product acceptance.

Discussion and conclusion: Following a standard development process, we could yield a design that meets clinical needs. This low-cost device provides a feasible platform for carrying out robot-assisted bilateral movement therapy of patients with hemiplegic stroke.

Clinical trial registration: identifier NCT02698605.

Keywords: bilateral movement therapy; rehabilitation device; stroke; upper limb rehabilitation; usability.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow of a usability test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) A patient performed bilateral diagonal movements using the device; (B) due to weakness of right upper limb, the patient’s grip was assisted with an elastic bandage, and the patient’s elbow was support by a sling; (C) the application scenario.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The flowchart for subject enrollment, assignment, allocation, follow-up, and analysis for the pretest and formal test.

References

    1. Brooke J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189, 4–7.
    1. Brooke J. (2013). SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8, 29–40.
    1. Brunnstrom S. (1966). Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys. Ther. 46, 357.
    1. Burgar C. G., Lum P. S., Shor P. C., Van der Loos H. F. M. (2000). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37, 663–674.
    1. Cauraugh J. H., Lodha N., Naik S. K., Summers J. J. (2010). Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Hum. Mov. Sci. 29, 853–870.10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.004
    1. Cronbach L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334.10.1007/BF02310555
    1. Feys H. M., De Weerdt W. J., Selz B. E., Cox Steck G. A., Spichiger R., Vereeck L. E., et al. (1998). Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke 29, 785–792.10.1161/01.STR.29.4.785
    1. Hesse S., Schulte-Tigges G., Konrad M., Bardeleben A., Werner C. (2003). Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 915–920.10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04954-7
    1. Krebs H. I., Hogan N., Aisen M. L., Volpe B. T. (1998). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6, 75–87.10.1109/86.662623
    1. Kwakkel G., Kollen B. J., Krebs H. I. (2008). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 111.10.1177/1545968307305457
    1. Kwakkel G., Kollen B. J., Wagenaar R. C. (1999). Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy 85, 377–391.10.1016/S0031-9406(05)67198-2
    1. Lee M., Rittenhouse M., Abdullah H. A. (2005). Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 42, 239–252.10.1007/s10846-004-7194-y
    1. Lewis J. R., Sauro J. (2009). “The factor structure of the system usability scale,” in Human Centered Design, ed. Kurosu M. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; ), 94–103.
    1. Lo A. C., Guarino P. D., Richards L. G., Haselkorn J. K., Wittenberg G. F., Federman D. G., et al. (2010). Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1772–1783.10.1056/NEJMoa0911341
    1. Lu E. C., Wang R. H., Hebert D., Boger J., Galea M. P., Mihailidis A. (2011). The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 6, 420–431.10.3109/17483107.2010.544370
    1. Mackay J., Mensah G. A., Mendis S., Greenlund K. (2004). The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Sauro J. (2013). 10 Things to Know About the System Usability Scale (SUS). Available at:
    1. Sharman M. J., Cresswell A. G., Riek S. (2006). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. Sports Med. 36, 929–939.10.2165/00007256-200636110-00002
    1. Stoykov M. E., Lewis G. N., Corcos D. M. (2009). Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 945–953.10.1177/1545968309338190
    1. Timmermans A. A. A., Seelen H. A. M., Willmann R. D., Kingma H. (2009). Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 6, 1.10.1186/1743-0003-6-1
    1. Tseng K. C. (2013). “An IPDD approach for systematic innovation of products, processes, and services: a case study on the development of a healthcare management system,” in The 5th IASDR World Conference on Design Research (Tokyo: IASDR).

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir