A Mobile App for Self-management of Urgency and Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women: Randomized Controlled Trial

Towe Wadensten, Emma Nyström, Karin Franzén, Anna Lindam, Elisabet Wasteson, Eva Samuelsson, Towe Wadensten, Emma Nyström, Karin Franzén, Anna Lindam, Elisabet Wasteson, Eva Samuelsson

Abstract

Background: Many women experience urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI) urinary incontinence but commonly hesitate to seek care. Treatment access and self-management for these conditions can be supported through eHealth approaches.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the mobile app Tät II for self-management of UUI and MUI in women.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included women ≥18 years old with UUI or MUI and ≥2 leakages per week. Those with red-flag symptoms were excluded. Participants were recruited via analog and digital advertisements and screened for initial selection through a web-based questionnaire. Data were collected using another questionnaire and a 2-day bladder diary. A telephone interview confirmed the symptom diagnosis. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive access to a treatment app (including pelvic floor muscle training, bladder training, psychoeducation, lifestyle advice, tailored advice, exercise log, reinforcement messages, and reminders) or an information app (control group), with no external treatment guidance provided. The primary outcome was incontinence symptoms at the 15-week follow-up, measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Urgency symptoms were assessed using the ICIQ-Overactive Bladder Module (ICIQ-OAB) and quality of life using the ICIQ-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). Incontinence episode frequency (IEF) was calculated per bladder diary entries. Improvement was measured using the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement. All outcomes were self-reported. Cure was defined as no leakages per the bladder diary. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results: Between April 2017 and March 2018, 123 women (mean age 58.3, SD 9.6 years) were randomized to the treatment (n=60, 2 lost to follow-up) or information (n=63) group. Of these, 35 (28%) women had UUI, and 88 (72%) had MUI. Mean ICIQ-UI SF score at follow-up was lower in the treatment group than in the information group (estimated difference -3.1, 95% CI -4.8 to -1.3). The estimated between-group difference was -1.8 (95% CI -2.8 to -0.99) for mean ICIQ-OAB score and -6.3 (95% CI -10.5 to -2.1) for the mean ICIQ-LUTSqol score at follow-up. IEF reduction from baseline to follow-up was greater in the treatment group (-10.5, IQR -17.5 to -3.5) than in the information group (P<.001). Improvement was reported by 87% (52/60) of treatment group participants and by 30% (19/63) of information group participants. The cure rate was 32% in the treatment group, and 6% in the information group (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.6; P=.002). About 67% (40/60) of the treatment group participants used the app more than thrice a week.

Conclusions: The treatment app was effective for improving urgency and mixed incontinence in women. When self-management is appropriate, this app may be a good alternative to pharmacological treatment or other conservative management, thus increasing access to care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03097549; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03097549.

Keywords: eHealth; mHealth; mixed urinary incontinence; mobile app; self-management; smartphone app; urgency urinary incontinence; urinary incontinence; women.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The logos Tät and Tät.nu are registered as trademark by The Swedish Patent and Registration office for E Samuelsson at Umeå University. None of the researchers have any financial interest in the programs.

©Towe Wadensten, Emma Nyström, Karin Franzén, Anna Lindam, Elisabet Wasteson, Eva Samuelsson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.04.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshots from the treatment app (Tät II). Upper-left corner: main (home) screen; upper-right corner: active view of an exercise in the bladder training program; lower-left corner: textual description of another bladder training exercise; lower-right corner: information from the lifestyle section. Text has been translated from Swedish to English for illustration purposes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial profile.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient’s Global Impression of Improvement responses reported by the participants at follow-up. Comparison between the treatment group (n=60) and the information group (n=63). *P<.001 (Mann-Whitney U test). Two participants were lost to follow-up in the treatment group and imputed as “no change” for this analysis.

References

    1. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1150–7.
    1. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog AR, Hjälmås K, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology. 2003 Oct;62(4 Suppl 1):16–23.
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence 6th Edition. Bristol, UK: ICI-ICS. International Continence Society; 2017.
    1. Milsom I, Coyne KS, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen C, Wein AJ. Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):79–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.031.
    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, International UA, International CS. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
    1. Siddiqui NY, Levin PJ, Phadtare A, Pietrobon R, Ammarell N. Perceptions about female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul;25(7):863–71. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2276-7.
    1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Kelleher CJ, Milsom I. The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study. BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1388–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07601.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07601.x.
    1. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E. The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2003 Nov;92(7):731–5.
    1. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1592–1604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12137.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NICE Guidance - Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. BJU Int. 2019 Apr 22;123(5):777–803. doi: 10.1111/bju.14763.
    1. Bo K, Fernandes A, Duarte T, Brito L, Ferreira C. Is pelvic floor muscle training effective for symptoms of overactive bladder in women? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2020 Mar;106:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.08.011.
    1. Minassian VA, Yan X, Lichtenfeld MJ, Sun H, Stewart WF. The iceberg of health care utilization in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Aug;23(8):1087–93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1743-x.
    1. Hägglund D, Wadensten B. Fear of humiliation inhibits women's care-seeking behaviour for long-term urinary incontinence. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Sep;21(3):305–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00481.x.
    1. Bernard S, Boucher S, McLean L, Moffet H. Mobile technologies for the conservative self-management of urinary incontinence: a systematic scoping review. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul 02;:1163–74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04012-w.
    1. Brown J, Michie S, Geraghty AWA, Yardley L, Gardner B, Shahab L, Stapleton JA, West R. Internet-based intervention for smoking cessation (StopAdvisor) in people with low and high socioeconomic status: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70195-X.
    1. Massoudi B, Holvast F, Bockting CLH, Burger H, Blanker MH. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:728–743. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.050.
    1. Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, Abrate A, Esperto F, Pavan N, De Nunzio C, Galfano A, Giannarini G, Gregori A, Liguori G, Bartoletti R, Porpiglia F, Scarpa RM, Simonato A, Trombetta C, Tubaro A, Ficarra V. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic? European Urology. 2020 Dec;78(6):786–811. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025.
    1. Grimes CL, Balk EM, Crisp CC, Antosh DD, Murphy M, Halder GE, Jeppson PC, Weber LeBrun EE, Raman S, Kim-Fine S, Iglesia C, Dieter AA, Yurteri-Kaplan L, Adam G, Meriwether KV. A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr 27;31(6):1063–1089. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04314-4.
    1. Sudol NT, Adams-Piper E, Perry R, Lane F, Chen KT. In Search of Mobile Applications for Patients With Pelvic Floor Disorders. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(3):252–256. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000527.
    1. Asklund I, Nyström E, Sjöström M, Umefjord G, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E. Mobile app for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Sep 09;:1369–76. doi: 10.1002/nau.23116.
    1. Hoffman V, Söderström L, Samuelsson E. Self-management of stress urinary incontinence via a mobile app: two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Oct;96(10):1180–1187. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13192.
    1. Nyström E, Sjöström M, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E. ICIQ symptom and quality of life instruments measure clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Nov;34(8):747–51. doi: 10.1002/nau.22657. doi: 10.1002/nau.22657.
    1. Sjöström M, Lindholm L, Samuelsson E. Mobile App for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 08;19(5):e154. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7383.
    1. Sjöström M, Umefjord G, Stenlund H, Carlbring P, Andersson G, Samuelsson E. Internet-based treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 1- and 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial with a focus on pelvic floor muscle training. BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):955–64. doi: 10.1111/bju.13091. doi: 10.1111/bju.13091.
    1. Huang AJ, Hess R, Arya LA, Richter HE, Subak LL, Bradley CS, Rogers RG, Myers DL, Johnson KC, Gregory WT, Kraus SR, Schembri M, Brown JS. Pharmacologic treatment for urgency-predominant urinary incontinence in women diagnosed using a simplified algorithm: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):444.e1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.002.
    1. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
    1. Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411–5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20674.
    1. Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, ICIQ Advisory Board The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire: . J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1063–6; discussion 1066. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00348-4.
    1. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7(4):524–532. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.
    1. Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98–101.
    1. Albers-Heitner PCP, Lagro-Janssen TALM, Joore MMA, Berghmans BLCM, Nieman FF, Venema PPL, Severens JJL, Winkens RRAG. Effectiveness of involving a nurse specialist for patients with urinary incontinence in primary care: results of a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;65(6):705–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02652.x.
    1. Shamliyan T, Wyman JF, Ramakrishnan R, Sainfort F, Kane RL. Benefits and harms of pharmacologic treatment for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):861–74, W301. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00436.
    1. Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, Leong WS, Yuen KH. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol) Urology. 2019 Nov;133:91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.004.
    1. Sjöström M, Stenlund H, Johansson S, Umefjord G, Samuelsson E. Stress urinary incontinence and quality of life: a reliability study of a condition-specific instrument in paper and web-based versions. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1242–6. doi: 10.1002/nau.22240.
    1. Uren AD, Cotterill N, Parke SE, Abrams P. Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jun;36(5):1342–9. doi: 10.1002/nau.23103.
    1. Nabi G, Cody JD, Ellis G, Herbison P, Hay-Smith J. Anticholinergic drugs versus placebo for overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub2.
    1. Mirabegron for treating symptoms of overactive bladder - Technology appraisal guidance TA290. National Institute for HealthCare Excellence (NICE) 2013. Jun 26, [2019-10-17]. .
    1. Samuelsson E, Odeberg J, Stenzelius K, Molander U, Hammarström M, Franzen K, Andersson G, Midlöv P. Effect of pharmacological treatment for urinary incontinence in the elderly and frail elderly: A systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 May;15(5):521–34. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12451.
    1. Sexton CC, Notte SM, Maroulis C, Dmochowski RR, Cardozo L, Subramanian D, Coyne KS. Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):567–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02626.x.
    1. Balk E, Adam G, Kimmel H, Rofeberg V, Saeed I, Jeppson P, Trikalinos T. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Report No. 212 (Prepared by the Brown Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00002-I for AHRQ and PCORI) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. Aug 08, Nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review update [Internet]
    1. Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou WS, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
    1. Latulippe K, Hamel C, Giroux D. Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731.
    1. Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 27;14(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1619.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir