Neuropsychological Test Performance of Cognitively Healthy Centenarians: Normative Data From the Dutch 100-Plus Study

Nina Beker, Sietske A M Sikkes, Marc Hulsman, Ben Schmand, Philip Scheltens, Henne Holstege, Nina Beker, Sietske A M Sikkes, Marc Hulsman, Ben Schmand, Philip Scheltens, Henne Holstege

Abstract

Objectives: The fraction of the population that reaches the age of 100 years is growing. At this age, dementia incidence is high and cognitive functioning is highly variable across individuals. Normative data for neuropsychological tests are lacking in centenarians, which hampers the ability to evaluate their cognitive functioning for both research and clinical practice. Here, we generated norms for neuropsychological tests in a sample of cognitively healthy centenarians while taking sensory impairments into account.

Design: Cross-sectional cohort study.

Setting: Centenarians who participate in the prospective 100-plus Study.

Participants: A total of 235 centenarians (71.5% female), who self-reported to be cognitively healthy, which was confirmed by an informant and a trained researcher.

Measurements: We generated normative data for 15 cognitive tests, measuring global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), premorbid intelligence, attention, language, memory, executive function, and visuospatial function by multiple linear regressions and/or by reporting percentiles.

Results: Normative data for global cognition resulted in a mean MMSE score of 25.6 ± 3.1 (range = 17-30; interquartile range = 24-28). Vision problems and fatigue often complicated the ability to complete tests, and these problems explained 41% and 22% of the missing test scores, respectively. In contrast, hearing problems (4%) and task incomprehension (6%) rarely complicated test performance. While educational level was associated with performance on the majority of the tests, sex and age were only weakly associated with test performance.

Conclusions: We generated normative data for 15 common neuropsychological tests in a large sample of cognitively healthy centenarians, while taking age-related sensory impairments into consideration. These normative data allow the detection of deficits across a wide range of cognitive domains. Our results suggest that, next to education level, vision ability and the level of fatigue should be taken into account when evaluating cognitive functioning in centenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:759-767, 2019.

Keywords: centenarians; cognitive functioning; neuropsychological tests; normative data; oldest-old.

© 2018 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of test scores. Boxplots represent raw test scores. See footnote in Table 3 for possible range of scores for each test. BW, backward; DART, Dutch Adult Reading Test; FW, forward; IQ, intelligence quotient; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination; RBMT, Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test; TMT, Trail Making Test; VAT, Visual Association Test.

References

    1. United Nations, New York, NY. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2002). World population ageing, 1950‐2050. United Nations Publications.
    1. Corrada MM, Brookmeyer R, Paganini‐Hill A, Berlau D, Kawas CH. Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest old: the 90+ study. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:114‐121.
    1. Peltz CB, Corrada MM, Berlau DJ, Kawas CH. Cognitive impairment in nondemented oldest‐old: prevalence and relationship to cardiovascular risk factors. Alzheimer's Dementia. 2012;8:87‐94.
    1. Poon LW, Woodard JL, Stephen Miller L, et al. Understanding dementia prevalence among centenarians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67:358‐365.
    1. Arosio B, Ostan R, Mari D, et al. Cognitive status in the oldest old and centenarians: a condition crucial for quality of life methodologically difficult to assess. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017;165:185‐194.
    1. Harada CN, Natelson Love MC, Triebel KL. Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29:737‐752.
    1. Beeri MS, Schmeidler J, Sano M, et al. Age, gender, and education norms on the CERAD neuropsychological battery in the oldest old. Neurology. 2006;67:1006‐1010.
    1. Hagberg B, Bauer Alfredson B, Poon LW, Homma A. Cognitive functioning in centenarians: a coordinated analysis of results from three countries. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56:P141‐P151.
    1. Miller LS, Mitchell MB, Woodard JL, et al. Cognitive performance in centenarians and the oldest old: norms from the Georgia centenarian study. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2010;17:575‐590.
    1. Mitchell MB, Miller LS, Woodard JL, et al. Norms from the Georgia centenarian study: measures of verbal abstract reasoning, fluency, memory, and motor function. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2013;20:620‐637.
    1. Miller IN, Himali JJ, Beiser AS, et al. Normative data for the cognitively intact oldest‐old: the Framingham Heart Study. Exp Aging Res. 2015;41:386‐409.
    1. Engberg H, Christensen K, Andersen‐Ranberg K, Jeune B. Cohort changes in cognitive function among Danish centenarians: a comparative study of 2 birth cohorts born in 1895 and 1905. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26:153‐160.
    1. Gondo Y, Hirose N, Arai Y, et al. Functional status of centenarians in Tokyo, Japan: developing better phenotypes of exceptional longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:305‐310.
    1. Holtsberg PA, Poon LW, Noble CA, Martin P. Mini‐Mental State Exam status of community‐dwelling cognitively intact centenarians. Int Psychogeriatr. 1995;7:417‐427.
    1. Inagaki H, Gondo Y, Hirose N, et al. Cognitive function in Japanese centenarians according to the Mini‐Mental State Examination. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28:6‐12.
    1. Davey A, Elias MF, Siegler IC, et al. Cognitive function, physical performance, health, and disease: norms from the Georgia centenarian study. Exp Aging Res. 2010;36:394‐425.
    1. Rahman‐Filipiak A, Woodard JL, Miller LS, et al. Octogenarian and centenarian performance on the Fuld object memory evaluation. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22:438‐451.
    1. De Santi S, Pirraglia E, Barr W, et al. Robust and conventional neuropsychological norms: diagnosis and prediction of age‐related cognitive decline. Neuropsychology. 2008;22:469‐484.
    1. Whittle C, Corrada MM, Dick M, et al. Neuropsychological data in nondemented oldest old: the 90+ study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29:290‐299.
    1. Holstege H, Beker N, Dijkstra T, et al. The 100‐plus study of cognitively healthy centenarians: rationale, design and cohort description. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33:1229‐1249.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini‐Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189‐198.
    1. Nelson HE, O'Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult reading test. Cortex. 1978;14:234‐244.
    1. Schmand B, Bakker D, Saan R, Louman J. The Dutch reading test for adults: a measure of premorbid intelligence level. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1991;22:15‐19.
    1. Schmand B, Lindeboom J, van Harskamp F. Dutch Adult Reading Test. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1992.
    1. Wechsler D. WAIS‐III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
    1. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8(3):271‐276.
    1. Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Sivan A. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates; 1989.
    1. Van der Elst W, Van Boxtel MP, Van Breukelen GJ, Jolles J. Normative data for the animal, profession and letter M naming verbal fluency tests for Dutch speaking participants and the effects of age, education, and sex. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:80‐89.
    1. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1996.
    1. Balen HGG, Groot Zwaaftink AJM. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Nederlandstalige Bewerking. Handleiding. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitling; 1987.
    1. Wilson BA, Cockbum J, Baddeley AD. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1985.
    1. Lindeboom J, Schmand B, Tulner L, Walstra G, Jonker C. Visual association test to detect early dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:126‐133.
    1. Warrington EK, James M. The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
    1. Munang L, Chan M, Lim W. Diagnostic performance of the clock drawing test using a pre‐drawn circle in persons with early dementia. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;5:54‐61.
    1. Shulman KI. Clock‐drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:548‐561.
    1. Unesco E. (1997). International Standard Classification of Education‐ISCED 1997: November 1997. Unesco.
    1. Mahoney, F., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 12, 61‐65.
    1. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) recent evidence and development of a shorter violence. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1‐2):165‐173.
    1. Kahle‐Wrobleski K, Corrada MM, Li B, Kawas CH. Sensitivity and specificity of the mini‐mental state examination for identifying dementia in the oldest‐old: the 90+ study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:284‐289.
    1. Baldelli MV, Salvioli G, Neri M, Pradelli JM. A survey of a centenarian population in Italy, focusing on self‐sufficiency and cognition. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1996;22(suppl 1):345‐354.
    1. Bauco C, Borriello C, Cinti AM, et al. Correlation between MMSE performance, age and education in centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1998;26:23‐26.
    1. Mossakowska M, Broczek K, Wieczorowska‐Tobis K, et al. Cognitive performance and functional status are the major factors predicting survival of centenarians in Poland. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1269‐1275.
    1. Brumback‐Peltz C, Balasubramanian AB, Corrada MM, Kawas CH. Diagnosing dementia in the oldest‐old. Maturitas. 2011;70:164‐168.
    1. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini‐mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922‐935.
    1. Mitchell AJ. A meta‐analysis of the accuracy of the mini‐mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. J Psychiatr Res. 2009;43:411‐431.
    1. Marcopulos BA, McLain CA, Giuliano AJ. Cognitive impairment or inadequate norms? A study of healthy, rural, older adults with limited education. Clin Neuropsychol. 1997;11:111‐131.
    1. Sachdev PS, Levitan C, Crawford J, et al. The Sydney Centenarian Study: methodology and profile of centenarians and near‐centenarians. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25:993‐1005.
    1. Corrada MM, Brookmeyer R, Berlau D, Paganini‐Hill A, Kawas CH. Prevalence of dementia after age 90: results from the 90+ study. Neurology. 2008;71:337‐343.
    1. Yang Z, Slavin MJ, Sachdev PS. Dementia in the oldest old. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:382‐393.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir