Changes in health-related quality of life and work-related outcomes for patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis receiving short-term and long-term treatment with multimatrix mesalamine: a prospective, open-label study

Mary Kaye Willian, Geert D'Haens, Aaron Yarlas, Ashish V Joshi, Mary Kaye Willian, Geert D'Haens, Aaron Yarlas, Ashish V Joshi

Abstract

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and with disease activity predicting lower HRQoL and worse work-related outcomes. The current study examined the burden of UC on patients' HRQoL, as well as changes in patients' HRQoL and work-related outcomes following short-term and long-term treatment with multimatrix mesalamine, and their correspondence with changes in disease activity.

Methods: Data were from an open-label, multinational, prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01124149) of 717 adults with active mild-to-moderate UC who were treated with 4.8 g/day multimatrix mesalamine tablets once daily for eight weeks (acute phase). Four-hundred sixty-one patients who achieved partial or complete clinical and endoscopic remission subsequently received treatment with daily 2.4 g/day multimatrix mesalamine for 12 months (maintenance phase). At baseline, Week 8, and Month 12, patients were administered patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures of HRQoL (the SF-12v2® Health Survey [SF-12v2] and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire) and work-related outcomes (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, UC-specific version). SF-12v2 scores were compared to the U.S. general population using Analysis of Variance models to assess burden of UC on HRQoL. Mixed-effects repeated-measures models compared PRO scores across visits to assess change in PRO scores over time. Correlations examined the correspondence of changes in PRO scores with changes on a modified UC disease activity index (UC-DAI).

Results: Baseline burden of disease observed on all SF-12v2 domains was partially eliminated at Week 8 and completely eliminated at Month 12. Statistically significant improvements from baseline were observed at both Week 8 and Month 12 for all PRO scores (all P < 0.001). Decreases in UC-DAI scores significantly predicted improvements in PRO scores during the acute treatment phase.

Conclusions: Patients with UC receiving daily multimatrix mesalamine treatment showed significant improvements in all measured domains of HRQoL and work-related outcomes. Patients who achieved partial or complete clinical and endoscopic remission maintained these improvements for most of these domains over 12 months with continued daily treatment. Changes in HRQoL and work-related outcomes were inversely related to changes in disease activity. Findings support the effectiveness of multimatrix mesalamine for improving, and sustaining improvements, in HRQoL and work-related outcomes.

Keywords: Absenteeism; Health-related quality of life; Inflammatory bowel disease; Multimatrix mesalamine; Presenteeism; Productivity; Ulcerative colitis; Work-related outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

The study protocol, the final approved informed consent document, relevant supporting information, and all types of subject recruitment information were submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) for each site, and approval was gained from the IRB/IEC and regulatory agency (if appropriate) prior to study initiation. Drug supplies were not released and subject recruitment did not commence until this written approval was received by the CRO. Shire and the IRB/IEC approved any amendments to the protocol prior to implementing changes in the study. The investigator was responsible for keeping the IRB/IEC informed of study progress and of any changes made to the protocol as deemed appropriate, in addition to reporting any serious and significant adverse events. This study was conducted in accordance with current applicable regulations, International ICH Good Clinical Practice and local ethical and legal requirements, and with the principles of the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki 1964) and amendments of the 29th (Tokyo 1975), 35th (Venice 1983), 41st (Hong Kong 1989) and 48th (South Africa 1996) World Medical Assemblies, Declaration of Helsinki. The subject’s informed consent was mandatory for study participation and was obtained in writing. The subject’s informed consent was documented (on an appropriate form approved by the Ethics Committee) by the dated signature of the subject and investigator (investigator signature as required by IRB/IEC). To guarantee subject confidentiality, personal details and consent documentation was kept by the investigator in the subject file.MKW and AVJ were employees of Shire at the time of the study and analysis and were holding stock and/or stock options at Shire. GD has received financial support for research from AbbVie, Janssen Biologics, Given Imaging, MSD, Dr. Falk Pharma, and Photopill; received lecture fees from AbbVie, Tillotts, Tramedico, Ferring, MSD, UCB, Norgine, and Shire; and consulted for AbbVie, Actogenix, Centocor, Cosmo, Engene, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biologics, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novo Nordisk, PDL Biopharma, Pfizer, SetPoint, Shire, Takeda, Teva, and UCB. AY is an employee of Optum, which received funds from Shire Development LLC for data analyses and manuscript development.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for disposition of trial patients. aThe safety population within each phase was defined as all patients who took at least one dose of the investigational product during that phase. bThe efficacy population within each phase was defined as all patients who took at least one dose of the investigational product and had at least one post-dose efficacy assessment during that phase
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SF-12v2 score differences between trial patients and an age- and gender-matched US general population sample. PF: physical functioning; RP: role physical; BP: bodily pain; GH: general health; VT: vitality; SF: social functioning; RE: role emotional; MH: mental health; PCS: physical component summary; MCS: mental component summary. Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals around mean differences. Significantly different from US general population sample based on P-values: * P < 0.05; † P < 0.01; ‡ P < 0.001

References

    1. Bernklev T, Jahnsen J, Lygren I, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease measured with the short Form-36: Psychometric assessments and a comparison with general population norms. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2005;11:909–918. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000179467.01748.99.
    1. Hodgkins P, Yen L, Yarlas A, et al. The impact of MMX mesalamine on improvement and maintenance of health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2013;19:386–396. doi: 10.1002/ibd.23022.
    1. Janke KH, Klump B, Gregor M, et al. Determinants of life satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2005;11:272–286. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000160809.38611.f7.
    1. Janke KH, Raible A, Bauer M, et al. Questions on life satisfaction (FLZM) in inflammatory bowel disease. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2004;19:343–353. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0522-z.
    1. Nordin K, Pahlman L, Larsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in a population-based sample of Swedish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002;37:450–457. doi: 10.1080/003655202317316097.
    1. Pallis AG, Vlachonikolis IG, Mouzas IA. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in Crete, Greece. BMC Gastroenterology. 2002;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-2-1.
    1. Mokrowiecka A, Jurek K, Pinkowski D, et al. The comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with GERD, peptic ulcer disease and ulcerative colitis. Advances in Medical Sciences. 2006;51:142–147.
    1. Bernklev T, Jahnsen J, Aadland E, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease five years after the initial diagnosis. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;39:365–373. doi: 10.1080/00365520310008386.
    1. Casellas F, Arenas JI, Baudet JS, et al. Impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A Spanish multicenter study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2005;11:488–496. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000159661.55028.56.
    1. Cohen BL, Zoega H, Shah SA, et al. Fatigue is highly associated with poor health-related quality of life, disability and depression in newly-diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease, independent of disease activity. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2014;39:811–822. doi: 10.1111/apt.12659.
    1. Gibson PR, Vaizey C, Black CM, et al. Relationship between disease severity and quality of life and assessment of health care utilization and cost for ulcerative colitis in Australia: A cross-sectional, observational study. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis. 2014;8:598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.11.017.
    1. Han SW, McColl E, Barton JR, et al. Predictors of quality of life in ulcerative colitis: The importance of symptoms and illness representations. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2005;11:24–34. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200501000-00004.
    1. Hjortswang H, Jarnerot G, Curman B, et al. Validation of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire in Swedish patients with ulcerative colitis. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;36:77–85. doi: 10.1080/00365520150218093.
    1. Larsson K, Loof L, Ronnblom A, et al. Quality of life for patients with exacerbation in inflammatory bowel disease and how they cope with disease activity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2008;64:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.10.007.
    1. Poole CD, Connolly MP, Nielsen SK, et al. A comparison of physician-rated disease severity and patient reported outcomes in mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis. 2010;4:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2009.11.010.
    1. Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Bala M, et al. Response and remission are associated with improved quality of life, employment and disability status, hours worked, and productivity of patients with ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2007;13:1135–1140. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20165.
    1. Zahn A, Hinz U, Karner M, et al. Health-related quality of life correlates with clinical and endoscopic activity indexes but not with demographic features in patients with ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2006;12:1058–1067. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000234134.35713.d2.
    1. Connolly MP, Poole CD, Currie CJ, et al. Quality of life improvements attributed to combination therapy with oral and topical mesalazine in mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis. Digestion. 2009;80:241–246. doi: 10.1159/000235916.
    1. Feagan BG, Reinisch W, Rutgeerts P, et al. The effects of infliximab therapy on health-related quality of life in ulcerative colitis patients. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007;102:794–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01094.x.
    1. Irvine EJ, Yeh CH, Ramsey D, et al. The effect of mesalazine therapy on quality of life in patients with mildly and moderately active ulcerative colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2008;28:1278–1286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03854.x.
    1. Solomon D, Yarlas A, Hodgkins P, et al. The impact of MMX mesalazine on disease-specific health-related quality of life in ulcerative colitis patients. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2012;35:1386–1396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05107.x.
    1. Bernklev T, Jahnsen J, Henriksen M, et al. Relationship between sick leave, unemployment, disability, and health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2006;12:402–412. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000218762.61217.4a.
    1. Bernstein CN, Kraut A, Blanchard JF, et al. The relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and socioeconomic variables. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96:2117–2125. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03946.x.
    1. Boonen A, Dagnelie PC, Feleus A, et al. The impact of inflammatory bowel disease on labor force participation: Results of a population sampled case-control study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2002;8:382–389. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200211000-00002.
    1. Gibson TB, Ng E, Ozminkowski RJ, et al. The direct and indirect cost burden of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008;50:1261–1272. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318181b8ca.
    1. Hoivik ML, Moum B, Solberg IC, et al. Work disability in inflammatory bowel disease patients 10 years after disease onset: Results from the IBSEN study. Gut. 2013;62:368–375. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302311.
    1. Neovius M, Arkema EV, Blomqvist P, et al. Patients with ulcerative colitis miss more days of work than the general population, even following colectomy. Gastroenterologia. 2013;144:536–543. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.004.
    1. Siebert U, Wurm J, Gothe RM, et al. Predictors of temporary and permanent work disability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2013;19:847–855. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e31827f278e.
    1. van der Valk ME, Mangen MJ, Leenders M, et al. Risk factors of work disability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease - a Dutch nationwide web-based survey: Work disability in inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis. 2014;8:590–597. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.11.019.
    1. Rubin David T., Bradette Marc, Gabalec Libor, Dobru Daniela, Márquez Juan, Inglis Susi, Magee Elizabeth, Solomon Dory, D’Haens Geert. Ulcerative Colitis Remission Status After Induction With Mesalazine Predicts Maintenance Outcomes: the MOMENTUM Trial. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis. 2016;10(8):925–933. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw049.
    1. Sutherland LR, Martin F, Greer S, et al. 5-Aminosalicylic acid enema in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, proctosigmoiditis, and proctitis. Gastroenterologia. 1987;92:1894–1898. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90621-4.
    1. Maruish ME, editor. User's manual for the SF-12v2 survey (3rd edition) Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Incorporated; 2012.
    1. Irvine EJ, Zhou Q, Thompson AK. The short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: A quality of life instrument for community physicians managing inflammatory bowel disease. CCRPT investigators. Canadian Crohn's relapse prevention trial. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1996;91:1571–1578.
    1. Han SW, Gregory W, Nylander D, et al. The SIBDQ: Further validation in ulcerative colitis patients. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2000;95:145–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01676.x.
    1. Jowett SL, Seal CJ, Barton JR, et al. The short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire is reliable and responsive to clinically important change in ulcerative colitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96:2921–2928. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04682.x.
    1. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics. 1993;4:353–365. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
    1. Efron B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1987;82:171–185. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2012;4:279–282. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
    1. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
    1. Aarts S, van den Akker M, Winkens B. The importance of effect sizes. The European Journal of General Practice. 2014;20:61–64. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.818655.
    1. Fisher RA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 1915;10:507–521.
    1. Fisher RA. On the 'probable error' of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metro. 1921;1:3–32.
    1. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925.
    1. Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63:581–592. doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.
    1. Kirby KN, Gerlanc D. BootES: An R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods. 2013;45:905–927. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5.
    1. Casellas F, Lopez-Vivancos J, Badia X, et al. Influence of inflammatory bowel disease on different dimensions of quality of life. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2001;13:567–572. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200105000-00017.
    1. Hjortswang H, Jarnerot G, Curman B, et al. The influence of demographic and disease-related factors on health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2003;15:1011–1020. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200309000-00012.
    1. Panes J, Su C, Bushmakin AG, et al. Randomized trial of tofacitinib in active ulcerative colitis: Analysis of efficacy based on patient-reported outcomes. BMC Gastroenterology. 2015;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0239-9.
    1. Devlen J, Beusterien K, Yen L, et al. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease: A patient-reported qualitative analysis and development of a conceptual model. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2014;20:545–552. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000440983.86659.81.
    1. Sammut J, Scerri J, Xuereb RB. The lived experience of adults with ulcerative colitis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2015;24:2659–2667. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12892.
    1. Waljee AK, Joyce JC, Wren PA, et al. Patient reported symptoms during an ulcerative colitis flare: A qualitative focus group study. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2009;21:558–564. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328326cacb.
    1. Jansen Femke, van Uden-Kraan Cornelia F., Braakman J. Annemieke, van Keizerswaard Paulina M., Witte Birgit I., Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M. A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014;23(6):1689–1697. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2528-1.
    1. Wolfe BJ, Sirois FM. Beyond standard quality of life measures: The subjective experiences of living with inflammatory bowel disease. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17:877–886. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9362-1.
    1. McCormick JB, Hammer RR, Farrell RM, et al. Experiences of patients with chronic gastrointestinal conditions: In their own words. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012;10:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-25.
    1. Cohen RD, Yu AP, Wu EQ, et al. Systematic review: The costs of ulcerative colitis in western countries. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2010;31:693–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04234.x.
    1. Hay JW, Hay AR. Inflammatory bowel disease: Costs-of-illness. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1992;14:309–317. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199206000-00009.
    1. Longobardi T, Jacobs P, Wu L, et al. Work losses related to inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: Results from a National Population Health Survey. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;98:844–849. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07378.x.
    1. Brereton N, Bodger K, Kamm MA, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of MMX mesalazine compared with mesalazine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis from a UK perspective. Journal of Medical Economics. 2010;13:148–161. doi: 10.3111/13696990903562861.
    1. Bodger K, Yen L, Szende A, et al. Medical resource utilization and associated costs in patients with ulcerative colitis in the UK: A chart review analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2014;26:213–221. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Buckland A, Bodger K. The cost-utility of high dose oral mesalazine for moderately active ulcerative colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2008;28:1287–1296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03856.x.
    1. Connolly MP, Boersma C, Oldenburg B. The economics of mesalazine in active ulcerative colitis and maintenance in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Journal of Medicine. 2012;70:272–277.
    1. Mitra D, Hodgkins P, Yen L, et al. Association between oral 5-ASA adherence and health care utilization and costs among patients with active ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterology. 2012;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-132.
    1. Prenzler A, Yen L, Mittendorf T, et al. Cost effectiveness of ulcerative colitis treatment in Germany: A comparison of two oral formulations of mesalazine. BMC Health Services Research. 2011;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-157.
    1. Yen EF, Kane SV, Ladabaum U. Cost-effectiveness of 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;103:3094–3105. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02130.x.
    1. Feagan BG, MacDonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;10:CD000543.
    1. Feagan BG, MacDonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;10:CD000544.
    1. Ware JE, Jr, Gandek B, Kosinski M, et al. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1167–1170.
    1. Kamm MA, Sandborn WJ, Gassull M, et al. Once-daily, high-concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterologia. 2007;132:66–75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.011.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir