The role of FDG-PET/CT in gynaecological cancers

Andrea G Rockall, Susan Cross, Sean Flanagan, Elizabeth Moore, Norbert Avril, Andrea G Rockall, Susan Cross, Sean Flanagan, Elizabeth Moore, Norbert Avril

Abstract

There is now a growing body of evidence supporting the use of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in gynaecological malignancies. Although this molecular imaging technique is becoming increasingly available, PET/CT remains an expensive imaging tool. It is essential to be familiar with the circumstances in which FDG-PET/CT can add value and contribute to patient management and indeed to know when it is unlikely to be of benefit. It is also important to understand and recognize the potential pitfalls. FDG-PET/CT has been most widely adopted for staging patients with suspected advanced disease or in suspected recurrence, offering a whole-body imaging approach. However, there is great potential for this technique to act as a predictive biomarker of response to treatment, as well as a prognostic biomarker. In addition, FDG-PET images may now be incorporated into radiotherapy planning in order to refine the delineation of dose according to metabolically active sites of disease. This article reviews the literature that provides the evidence for the use of FDG-PET in gynaecological malignancies, identifies areas of real benefit and future potential, and highlights circumstances where there is limited value.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient being investigated for a uterine mass. Sagittal T2 (a) and axial T2 (b) MRI demonstrate a mass arising from the uterus (arrow). The mixed high signal intensity of the mass raised the possibility of a leiomyosarcoma. FDG-PET/CT (c) demonstrated marked FDG uptake within the mass with some central necrosis. After surgical resection, the mass was confirmed to be a benign fibroid that had undergone degenerative changes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient with suspected recurrent ovarian cancer. Contrast-enhanced CT (a) demonstrates 2 sites of recurrent disease along the bowel serosa (arrows) that are very difficult to identify with confidence. The accompanying fused FDG-PET/CT (b) clearly demonstrates the 2 highly metabolically active serosal deposits.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient with CA-125 relapse but no clear evidence of recurrence on CT imaging. Fused FDG-PET/CT (a) and accompanying contrast-enhanced CT (b) demonstrate a serosal deposit along a loop of bowel within the stoma (arrow) that is very difficult to appreciate on CT. Repeat imaging after the first cycle of chemotherapy demonstrates a significant reduction in the metabolic activity of the serosal deposit, highly suggestive of a likely responder to treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patient with recurrent ovarian cancer. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of FDG-PET study prior to treatment (a) shows widespread avid uptake at multiple sites of metastatic disease in the neck, chest and abdomen. Two months after the start of chemotherapy, follow-up imaging demonstrates no residual FDG-avid tumour sites, consistent with a complete metabolic response.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Preoperative imaging assessment in a patient with high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI (a) demonstrates a large tumour mass in the endometrial cavity (arrow), which demonstrated deep myometrial invasion. No enlarged nodes could be seen on MRI in the pelvis or para-aortic positions. The stage on MRI alone was FIGO IB. Coronal fused FDG-PET/CT image (b) demonstrates focal uptake within a para-aortic lymph node, up-staging the patient to FIGO IIIC2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Patient with a history of high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer treated 2 years previously presented with a painful left shoulder and suspicious radiograph. FDG-PET/CT confirmed metabolically active disease confined to the left shoulder (arrow).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Patient with FIGO stage IIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. (a) Initial pretreatment MRI (axial T2-weighted image) demonstrates primary cervical tumour with parametrial invasion (long arrow) and left pelvic node involvement (short arrow). No para-aortic lymphadenopathy was demonstrated on abdominal sequences. Fused FDG-PET/CT confirmed highly FDG-avid primary tumour and a single pelvic nodal metastasis (b). Therefore the patient was not suitable for radical surgery and underwent primary chemoradiotherapy treatment. FDG-PET/CT was performed 3 months after completion of treatment (c,d). This demonstrates complete response to the irradiated tumour in the pelvis (c). However, there is disease relapse above the radiotherapy field in the para-aortic region (arrow, d). This finding indicates an adverse prognosis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Stage IIa adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI (a) demonstrates an ill-defined tumour in the cervix (arrow). MIP image of an FDG-PET study (b) demonstrates intermediate- to low-grade FDG uptake in the primary tumour (arrow). The level of tumour metabolic activity has been reported to be a predictor of survival.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Patient with advanced cervical carcinoma at presentation. Fused FDG-PET/CT demonstrates a highly metabolically active primary tumour (a). Nodal evaluation is difficult on the fused image (b). However, on the contrast-enhanced CT, there is bilateral nodal necrosis (arrows). These could not be mistaken for the ovaries in this case, as there was ovarian hyperstimulation prior to egg retrieval (d).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Patient with advanced carcinoma of the cervix, imaged 6 months after treatment with primary chemoradiation. Axial T2-weighted MRI (a) demonstrates an area of intermediate T2 signal intensity at the site of the original tumour. This was suspected to be residual disease. Fused FDG-PET/CT (b) demonstrates no evidence of FDG-avid disease. The patient has remained well on clinical follow-up.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Patient with recurrent vulval carcinoma. On the axial T2-weighted MRI (a), there is a large lymphocyst in the left groin due to previous groin node dissection (small arrow). The recurrent tumour is seen in the vulva (large arrow). The patient underwent percutaneous drainage of the lymphocyst. Following this, FDG-PET/CT was undertaken to exclude other sites of disease prior to planning further surgery. Fused FDG-PET/CT confirmed multifocal disease in the vulva (small arrows). Low-grade FDG uptake is seen in the wall of the drained lymphocyst, consistent with probable inflammatory change. No FDG-avid disease was seen elsewhere.

References

    1. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012.
    1. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047787.
    1. Weber WA, Avril N, Schwaiger M. Relevance of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology. Strahlenther Onkol. 1999;175:356–73. doi: 10.1007/s000660050022.
    1. Short S, Hoskin P, Wong W. Ovulation and increased FDG uptake on PET: potential for a false-positive result. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:707. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000178248.98702.9e.
    1. Subhas N, Patel PV, Pannu HK, Jacene HA, Fishman EK, Wahl RL. Imaging of pelvic malignancies with in-line FDG PET-CT: case examples and common pitfalls of FDG PET. Radiographics. 2005;25:1031–43. doi: 10.1148/rg.254045155.
    1. Stahl A, Weber WA, Avril N, Schwaiger M. Effect of N-butylscopolamine on intestinal uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in PET imaging of the abdomen. Nuklearmedizin. 2000;39:241–5.
    1. Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:589–95. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3281afa256.
    1. Fenchel S, Grab D, Nuessle K, et al. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2002;223:780–8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2233001850.
    1. Grab D, Flock F, Stohr I, et al. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:454–9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5768.
    1. Nam EJ, Yun MJ, Oh YT, et al. Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:389–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.059.
    1. Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:123–9.
    1. Kawahara K, Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, et al. Evaluation of positron emission tomography with tracer 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in selected women after ultrasonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:505–16. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200407000-00011.
    1. Risum S, Hogdall C, Loft A, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer–a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:145–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.022.
    1. Kim SK, Kang KW, Roh JW, Sim JS, Lee ES, Park SY. Incidental ovarian 18F-FDG accumulation on PET: correlation with the menstrual cycle. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:757–63. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1771-6.
    1. Nishizawa S, Inubushi M, Okada H. Physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the ovaries and uterus of healthy female volunteers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:549–56. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1703-x.
    1. Lerman H, Metser U, Grisaru D, Fishman A, Lievshitz G, Even-Sapir E. Normal and abnormal 18F-FDG endometrial and ovarian uptake in pre- and postmenopausal patients: assessment by PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:266–71.
    1. Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kawahara K, et al. Incremental benefits of FDG positron emission tomography over CT alone for the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:227–33.
    1. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1912–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0890-2.
    1. De Rosa V, Mangoni di Stefano ML, Brunetti A, et al. Computed tomography and second-look surgery in ovarian cancer patients. Correlation, actual role and limitations of CT scan. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1995;16:123–9.
    1. Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, Sun L, Huang G. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:164–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.019.
    1. Nakamoto Y, Saga T, Ishimori T, et al. Clinical value of positron emission tomography with FDG for recurrent ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1449–54.
    1. Sebastian S, Lee SI, Horowitz NS, et al. PET-CT vs. CT alone in ovarian cancer recurrence. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:112–18. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9218-0.
    1. Thrall MM, DeLoia JA, Gallion H, Avril N. Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.060.
    1. Iagaru AH, Mittra ES, McDougall IR, Quon A, Gambhir SS. 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:1046–51. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32831089cb.
    1. Mangili G, Picchio M, Sironi S, et al. Integrated PET/CT as a first-line re-staging modality in patients with suspected recurrence of ovarian cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:658–66. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0306-0.
    1. Cho SM, Ha HK, Byun JY, Lee JM, Kim CJ, Nam-Koong SE. Usefulness of FDG PET for assessment of early recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:391–5.
    1. Sironi S, Messa C, Mangili G, et al. Integrated FDG PET/CT in patients with persistent ovarian cancer: correlation with histologic findings. Radiology. 2004;233:433–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2332031800.
    1. Simcock B, Neesham D, Quinn M, Drummond E, Milner A, Hicks RJ. The impact of PET/CT in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:271–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.004.
    1. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1439–48. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0776-3.
    1. Weber WA. Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3282–92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.6068.
    1. Avril NE, Weber WA. Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43:189–204. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.09.006.
    1. Avril N, Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, et al. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7445–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.965.
    1. Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:546–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.009.
    1. Suzuki R, Miyagi E, Takahashi N, et al. Validity of positron emission tomography using fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for the preoperative evaluation of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:890–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00859.x.
    1. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1652–8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3372.
    1. Nayot D, Kwon JS, Carey MS, Driedger A. Does preoperative positron emission tomography with computed tomography predict nodal status in endometrial cancer? A pilot study. Curr Oncol. 2008;15:123–5.
    1. Picchio M, Mangili G, Samanes Gajate AM, et al. High-grade endometrial cancer: value of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:506–12.
    1. Signorelli M, Guerra L, Buda A, et al. Role of the integrated FDG PET/CT in the surgical management of patients with high risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: detection of pelvic nodal metastases. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:231–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.07.020.
    1. Nakamura K, Kodama J, Okumura Y, Hongo A, Kanazawa S, Hiramatsu Y. The SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET correlates with histological grade in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:110–15. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181c3a288.
    1. Chung HH, Kang WJ, Kim JW, et al. The clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1081–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0687-8.
    1. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY, et al. Clinical impact of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the posttherapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma: evaluation of 88 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:1332–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2008.01197.x.
    1. Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Nakamoto Y, et al. Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1490–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1440-2.
    1. Sugawara Y, Eisbruch A, Kosuda S, Recker BE, Kison PV, Wahl RL. Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1125–31.
    1. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3745–3749.
    1. Belhocine T, Thille A, Fridman V, et al. Contribution of whole-body (18)FDG PET imaging in the management of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:90–97. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6769.
    1. Narayan K, Hicks RJ, Jobling T, Bernshaw D, McKenzie AF. A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: potential impact on treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:263–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.011004263.x.
    1. Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology. 2001;218:776–82.
    1. Xue F, Lin LL, Dehdashti F, Miller TR, Siegel BA, Grigsby PW. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in primary cervical cancer as an indicator of prognosis after radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:147–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.005.
    1. Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:353–9.
    1. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:759–66.
    1. Chou HH, Chang HP, Lai CH, et al. 18)F-FDG PET in stage IB/IIB cervical adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 37:728–35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1336-1.
    1. Magne N, Chargari C, Vicenzi L, et al. New trends in the evaluation and treatment of cervix cancer: the role of FDG-PET. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:671–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.08.003.
    1. Tran BN, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Siegel BA. Occult supraclavicular lymph node metastasis identified by FDG-PET in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:572–6. doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00402-5.
    1. Singh AK, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Siegel BA. FDG-PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:489–93. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04521-2.
    1. Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Pelvic lymph node F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a prognostic biomarker in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer. 2010;116:1469–75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24972.
    1. Cervical cancer 1.2011. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines™) (accessed 30 January 2012; login required)
    1. MacManus M, Nestle U, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006–2007. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.008.
    1. Taylor A, Rockall AG, Reznek RH, Powell ME. Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1604–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.062.
    1. Grigsby PW. PET/CT imaging to guide cervical cancer therapy. Future Oncol. 2009;5:953–958. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.70.
    1. Babar S, Rockall A, Goode A, Shepherd J, Reznek R. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of recurrent cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:637–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00849.x.
    1. Ryu SY, Kim MH, Choi SC, Choi CW, Lee KH. Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:347–52.
    1. Chung HH, Jo H, Kang WJ, et al. Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:529–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.009.
    1. Sironi S, Picchio M, Landoni C, et al. Post-therapy surveillance of patients with uterine cancers: value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:472–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0251-y.
    1. Mittra E, El-Maghraby T, Rodriguez CA, et al. Efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1952–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1206-x.
    1. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2040–7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0979-9.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of cervical cancer. 2008. (accessed 30 January 2012)
    1. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. [(18)F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [(18)F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:682–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1120-6.
    1. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2167–71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.035.
    1. Grigsby PW. The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:S27–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.034.
    1. Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. JAMA. 2007;298:2289–95. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2289.
    1. Imperiale A, Heymann S, Claria M, et al. F-18 FDG PET-CT in a rare case of Bartholin's gland undifferentiated carcinoma managed with chemoradiation and interstitial brachytherapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2007;32:498–500. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318053783d.
    1. Husain A, Akhurst T, Larson S, Alektiar K, Barakat RR, Chi DS. A prospective study of the accuracy of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) in identifying sites of metastasis prior to pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:177–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.018.
    1. De Hullu JA, Pruim J, Que TH, et al. Noninvasive detection of inguinofemoral lymph node metastases in squamous cell cancer of the vulva by L. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999;9:141–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.09909.x.
    1. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY, et al. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:486–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.044.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir