Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review

Ellen L Mozurkewich, Julie L Chilimigras, Deborah R Berman, Uma C Perni, Vivian C Romero, Valerie J King, Kristie L Keeton, Ellen L Mozurkewich, Julie L Chilimigras, Deborah R Berman, Uma C Perni, Vivian C Romero, Valerie J King, Kristie L Keeton

Abstract

Background: Rates of labour induction are increasing. We conducted this systematic review to assess the evidence supporting use of each method of labour induction.

Methods: We listed methods of labour induction then reviewed the evidence supporting each. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library between 1980 and November 2010 using multiple terms and combinations, including labor, induced/or induction of labor, prostaglandin or prostaglandins, misoprostol, Cytotec, 16,16,-dimethylprostaglandin E2 or E2, dinoprostone; Prepidil, Cervidil, Dinoprost, Carboprost or hemabate; prostin, oxytocin, misoprostol, membrane sweeping or membrane stripping, amniotomy, balloon catheter or Foley catheter, hygroscopic dilators, laminaria, dilapan, saline injection, nipple stimulation, intercourse, acupuncture, castor oil, herbs. We performed a best evidence review of the literature supporting each method. We identified 2048 abstracts and reviewed 283 full text articles. We preferentially included high quality systematic reviews or large randomised trials. Where no such studies existed, we included the best evidence available from smaller randomised or quasi-randomised trials.

Results: We included 46 full text articles. We assigned a quality rating to each included article and a strength of evidence rating to each body of literature. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and vaginal misoprostol were more effective than oxytocin in bringing about vaginal delivery within 24 hours but were associated with more uterine hyperstimulation. Mechanical methods reduced uterine hyperstimulation compared with PGE2 and misoprostol, but increased maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity compared with other methods. Membrane sweeping reduced post-term gestations. Most included studies were too small to evaluate risk for rare adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: Research is needed to determine benefits and harms of many induction methods.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram.

References

    1. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, Lee JF, Wong L, Shaffer BL, Tran SH. et al.Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. [Review] [168 refs] Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. 2009;176:1–257.
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol [Protocol] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Clinical Evidence Glossary: Helping You to Practice Evidence-Based Medicine.
    1. Creating a Framework for "Best Evidence" Approaches in Systematic Reviews, Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol.
    1. Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2008;22(3):471–482. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.003.
    1. Critical appraisal: notes and checklists.
    1. Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
    1. Cates C. Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Mathodology. 2002;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-1.
    1. Visual Rx, Version 2.
    1. EBM Tools: Glossary.
    1. Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J. et al.Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy. 2009;64(5):669–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x.
    1. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.
    1. Moher D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009;62(10):1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
    1. Kelly AJ, Malik S, Smith L, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010.
    1. Boulvain M, Kelly AJ, Irion O. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour [Systematic Review] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour [Systematic Review] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;2:2.
    1. Kunt C, Kanat-Pektas M, Gungor ANC, Kurt RK, Ozat M, Gulerman C, Gungor T, Mollamahmutoglu L. Randomized Trial of Vaginal Prostaglandin E2 Versus Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Term Premature Rupture of Membranes. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;49(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60010-1.
    1. Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Howarth G, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Hofmeyr JG, Gulmezoglu MA, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010.
    1. Alfirevic Z, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Gaffaney CAL, Saul L, Rumney P, Morrison E, Thomas S, Nageotte M, Wing D. Outpatient oral misoprostol for prolonged pregnancies: a pilot investigation. American Journal of Perinatology. 2009;26(9):673–677. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220790.
    1. Nagpal M, Raghunandan C, Saili A. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term. International journal of gynecology and obstetrics. 2009;106(1):23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.014.
    1. Muzonzini G, Hofmeyr GJ. Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Bartusevicius A, Barcaite E, Nadisauskiene R. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91(1):2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.07.002.
    1. Souza ASR, Amorim MMR, Feitosa FEL. Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;115(11):1340–1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01872.x.
    1. Lo TK, Lau WL, Wong KS, Tang LC. Sublingual misoprostol compared to artificial rupture of membranes plus oxytocin infusion for labour induction in nulliparous women with a favourable cervix at term. Hong Kong Med J. 2006;12(5):345–350.
    1. Elhassan EM, Nasr AM, Adam I. Sublingual compared with oral and vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(2):153–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.014.
    1. Boulvain M, Kelly AJ, Lohse C, Stan CM, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010.
    1. Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008;199(2):177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.005. discussion 187-178.
    1. Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;203(5):418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.
    1. Moraes Filho OB, Albuquerque R, Cecatti J. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010;89(8):1045–1052. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499447.
    1. Boulvain M, Stan CM, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Kaul V, Aggarwal N, Ray P. Membrane stripping versus single dose intracervical prostaglandin gel administration for cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;86(3):388–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.04.035.
    1. Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Baradaran H, Samiee MM. Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(1):41–44. doi: 10.1159/000091842.
    1. de Miranda E, van der Bom JG, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP, Rosendaal FR. Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial. Bjog. 2006;113(4):402–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x.
    1. Hill M, McWilliams G, Garcia-Sur D, Chen B, Munroe M, Hoeldtke N. The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;111(6):1313–1319. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816fdcf3.
    1. Yildirim G, Gngrdk K, Karadağ OI, Aslan H, Turhan E, Ceylan Y. Membrane sweeping to induce labor in low-risk patients at term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Maternal - Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2010;23(7):681–687. doi: 10.3109/14767050903387078.
    1. Hamdan M, Sidhu K, Sabir N, Omar S, Tan P. Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;114(4):745–751. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b8fa00.
    1. Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Smith CA, Crowther CA. Acupuncture for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Smith CA, Crowther CA, Collins CT, Coyle ME. Acupuncture to induce labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008;112(5):1067–1074. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b46bb.
    1. Asher G, Coeytaux R, Chen W, Reilly A, Loh Y, Harper T. Acupuncture to initiate labor (Acumoms 2): a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Maternal - Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2009;22(10):843–848. doi: 10.1080/14767050902906386.
    1. Modlock J, Nielsen BB, Uldbjerg N. Acupuncture for the induction of labour: a double-blind randomised controlled study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2010;117(10):1255–1261. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02647.x.
    1. Selmer-Olsen T, Lydersen S, Mrkved S. Does acupuncture used in nulliparous women reduce time from prelabour rupture of membranes at term to active phase of labour? A randomised controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(12):1447–1452. doi: 10.1080/00016340701645287.
    1. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Smith CA. Homoeopathy for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010.
    1. Omer H, Sirkovitz A. Failure of hypnotic relaxation in the treatment of postterm pregnancies. Psychosom Med. 1987;49(6):606–609.
    1. Hutton EK, Mozurkewich EL. Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Luckas M, Bricker L. Intravenous prostaglandin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010.
    1. French L. Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Hapangama D, Neilson JP. Mifepristone for induction of labour.[update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD002865; PMID: 11034779] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009. p. CD002865.
    1. Thomas J, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Corticosteroids for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Relaxin for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Habib SM, Emam SS, Saber AS. Outpatient cervical ripening with nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labor. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. 2008;101(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.027.
    1. Osman I, MacKenzie F, Norrie J, Murray HM, Greer IA, Norman JE. The "PRIM" study: a randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2 gel with the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening before the induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):1012–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.812.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir