Comparison of post-operative bleeding incidence in laser hemorrhoidoplasty with and without hemorrhoidal artery ligation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Shu Yu Lim, Retnagowri Rajandram, April Camilla Roslani, Shu Yu Lim, Retnagowri Rajandram, April Camilla Roslani

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation supplementation in reducing the incidence of post laser hemorrhoidoplasty bleeding has not been investigated.

Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative bleeding incidence in patients undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) only versus LHP with hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL). Outcome measures included post-operative bleeding and its severity (i.e. verbal rating scale and Clavien-Dindo classification), presence of perianal swelling and pain score (visual analog score) at 1-day, 1-week and 6-weeks post-operatively. Statistical tests were performed and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Seventy-six patients were randomized. There was no difference in median operating time. The bleeding incidence was highest at 1-week post-operatively (17.1%), and decreased to 1.3% at 6-weeks. There was no significant difference in bleeding incidence between both groups at any of the measured timepoints (P > 0.05). Severity of bleeding and incidence of post-operative perianal swelling were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference in median pain scores.

Conclusion: Supplementation of HAL to LHP does not reduce the post-operative bleeding incidence. LHP is sufficient as a stand-alone procedure for treating haemorrhoids.

Trial registration: National Registration Number is NMRR-15-1112-24065 (IIR). The trial start date was 1st January 2015 with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier and registration number as NCT04667169.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Hemorrhoidal artery ligation; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Laser hemorrhoidoplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

None. All authors declare not to have any conflict or competing of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The randomized control trial consort diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Grading of the extended Clavien-Dindo classification for post-operative haemorrhage [7]

References

    1. Ganz RA. The evaluation and treatment of haemorrhoids: a guide for the gastroenterologist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2013;11(6):593–603. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.020.
    1. Sandler RS, Peery AF. Rethinking what we know about hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2019;17(1):8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.020.
    1. Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of haemorrhoids: a coloproctologist's view. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(31):9245–9252. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9245.
    1. Ul Ain Q, Bashir Y, Eguare E. Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients' contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study. Ir J Med Sci. 2018;187(3):647–655. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1715-8.
    1. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatments: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg J. 1997;40(1):14–17.
    1. Longchamp G, Liot E, Meyer J, Toso C, Buchs NC, Ris F. Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(3):485–496. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03142-8.
    1. Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, Cocorullo G, Giordano P, Mistrangelo M, Trompetto M. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(2):145–164. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02149-1.
    1. Won LS, Real LK, Yean HD. The efficacy of a Nd:YAG laser in a hemorrhoidectomy. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1999;15(3):203–208.
    1. Weyand G, Theis CS, Fofana AN, Rudiger F, Gehrke T. Laserhemorrhoidoplasty with 1470 nm diode laser in the treatment of second to fourth degree hemorrhoidal disease—a cohort study with 497 patients. Zentralbl Chir. 2019;144(4):355–363. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120449.
    1. Plapler H, Hage R, Duarte J, Lopes N, Masson I, Cazarini C, Fukuda T. A new method for haemorrhoid surgery: intrahemorrhoidal diode laser, does it work? Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(5):819–823. doi: 10.1089/pho.2008.2368.
    1. Gupta PJ, Kalaskar S, Taori S, Heda PS. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):439–444. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0780-7.
    1. Avital S, Inbar R, Karin E, Greenberg R. Is Doppler ultrasonography essential for hemorrhoidal artery ligation? Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16(4):291–294. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0844-3.
    1. Ng KS, Holzgang M, Young C. Still a case of "no pain, no gain"? An updated and critical review of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management options for hemorrhoids in 2020. Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):133–147. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.05.04.
    1. Eskandaros M, Darwish A. Comparative study between Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, stapled hemorrhoidopexy, and laser hemorrhoidoplasty in patients with third degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study. Egypt J Surg. 2020;39(2):352–363. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_214_19.
    1. Poskus T, Danys D, Makunaite G, Mainelis A, Mikalauskas S, Poskus E, Jotautas V, Dulskas A, Jasiunas E, Strupas K. Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(3):481–490. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03460-6.
    1. Qamar Naqvi SR, Qamar Naqvi SS, Rashid MM, Sheikh IA, Ali M, Nafees AUA. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation operation without Doppler guidance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30(Suppl 1):S664–s667.
    1. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Elia M, Gracia JA, Martinez M. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation in the management of symptomatic haemorrhoids. Rev Espanola Enfermed Digest Organo Off Soc Espanola Patolog Digest. 2005;97(2):97–103. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082005000200004.
    1. Nikam V, Deshpande A, Chandorkar I, Sahoo S (2018) A prospective study of efficacy and safety of rubber band ligation in the treatment of Grade II and III haemorrhoids—a western Indian experience. J Coloproctol. 38.10.1016/j.jcol.2018.03.006.
    1. Chong HY, Roslani AC, Rajandram R, Kumar S, Malik AA, Law CW, Rajasingam V, Kasipillai J. Clinical short-term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidplasty: a multicenter study. J Health Transl Med (JUMMEC). 2022 (in press).
    1. De Nardi P, Tamburini AM, Gazzetta PG, Lemma M, Pascariello A, Asteria CR. Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: results from a multicenter prospective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(7):455–459. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1479-6.
    1. Giamundo P, Braini A, Calabro G, Crea N, De Nardi P, Fabiano F, Lippa M, Mastromarino A, Tamburini AM. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): indications and clinical outcome in the long-term. Results of a multicenter trial. Surg Endosc. 2021; 10.1007/s00464-020-08248-2.
    1. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, Tsubosa Y, Satoh T, Yokomizo A, Fukuda H, Sasako M. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46(6):668–685. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x.
    1. Maloku H, Gashi Z, Lazovic R, Islami H, Juniku-Shkololli A. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure vs open surgical hemorrhoidectomy: a trial comparing 2 treatments for hemorrhoids of third and fourth degree. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(6):365–367. doi: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.365-367.
    1. Song Y, Chen H, Yang F, Zeng Y, He Y, Huang H. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of haemorrhoids: a PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(29):e11502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011502.
    1. Danys D, Pacevicius J, Makunaite G, Palubeckas R, Mainelis A, Markevicius N, Strupas K, Poskus T. Tissue coagulation in laser hemorrhoidoplasty—an experimental study. Open Med (Wars) 2020;15:185–189. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0027.
    1. Margetis N. Pathophysiology of internal haemorrhoids. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32(3):264–272. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0355.
    1. Giamundo P. Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(1):1–4. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.1.
    1. Rosen L, Sipe P, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Trimpi HD. Outcome of delayed haemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(8):743–746. doi: 10.1007/bf02048364.
    1. Place RJ, Coloma M, White PF, Huber PJ, Van Vlymen J, Simmang CL. Ketorolac improves recovery after outpatient anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(6):804–808. doi: 10.1007/bf02238018.
    1. Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Tsai WS, Tang R. Effective management of posthemorrhoidectomy secondary haemorrhage using rectal irrigation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(2):234–238. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6154-8.
    1. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11):1837–1845. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8.
    1. Porrett LJ, Porrett JK, Ho YH. Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review. Int Surg. 2015;100(1):44–57. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00173.1.
    1. Béliard A, Labbé F, de Faucal D, Fabreguette JM, Pouderoux P, Borie F. A prospective and comparative study between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(4):257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.03.009.
    1. Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):777–779. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir