How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults

Nicky van Melick, Bart M Meddeler, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Robert E H van Cingel, Nicky van Melick, Bart M Meddeler, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Robert E H van Cingel

Abstract

Context: Since decades leg dominance is suggested to be important in rehabilitation and return to play in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. However, an ideal method to determine leg dominance in relation to task performance is still lacking.

Objective: To test the agreement between self-reported and observed leg dominance in bilateral mobilizing and unilateral stabilizing tasks, and to assess whether the dominant leg switches between bilateral mobilizing tasks and unilateral stabilizing tasks.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: Forty-one healthy adults: 21 men aged 36 ± 17 years old and 20 women aged 36 ±15 years old.

Measurement and analysis: Participants self-reported leg dominance in the Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire-Revised (WFQ-R), and leg dominance was observed during performance of four bilateral mobilizing tasks and two unilateral stabilizing tasks. Descriptive statistics and crosstabs were used to report the percentages of agreement.

Results: The leg used to kick a ball had 100% agreement between the self-reported and observed dominant leg for both men and women. The dominant leg in kicking a ball and standing on one leg was the same in 66.7% of the men and 85.0% of the women. The agreement with jumping with one leg was lower: 47.6% for men and 70.0% for women.

Conclusions: It is appropriate to ask healthy adults: "If you would shoot a ball on a target, which leg would you use to shoot the ball?" to determine leg dominance in bilateral mobilizing tasks. However, a considerable number of the participants switched the dominant leg in a unilateral stabilizing task.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Leg domiance questionaire used in…
Fig 1. Leg domiance questionaire used in this study.
The original questions of the WFQ-R are marked with a *.

References

    1. Cug M, Wikstrom EA, Golshaei B, Kirazci S. The effect of sex, limb dominance, and soccer participation on knee proprioception and dynamic postural control. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(1): 31–39.
    1. Alonso AC, Brech GH, Bourquin AM, Greve JM. The influence of lower-limb dominance on postural balance. Sao Paulo Med. 2011;129(6): 410–413.
    1. McGrath TM, Waddington G, Scarvell JM, Ball NB, Creer R, Woods K, et al. The effect of limb dominance on lower limb functional performance–a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(4): 289–302. doi:
    1. Ruedl G, Webhofer M, Helle K, Strobl M, Schranz A, Fink C, et al. Leg dominance is a risk factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female recreational skiers. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(6): 1269–1273. doi:
    1. Brophy R, Silvers HJ, Gonzales T, Mandelbaum BR. Gender influences: the role of leg dominance in ACL injury among soccer players. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(10): 694–697. doi:
    1. Negrete RJ, Schick AE, Cooper JP. Lower limb dominance as a possible etiologic factor in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1): 270–273. doi:
    1. Demura S, Yamaji S. Lateral dominance of legs in maximal muscle power, muscular endurance, and grading ability. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;93(1): 11–23. doi:
    1. Nunome H, Ikegami Y, Kozakai R, Apriantono T, Sano S. Segmental dynamics of soccer instep kicking with the preferred and non-preferred leg. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(5): 529–541. doi:
    1. Peters M. Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2): 179–192.
    1. Chapman JP, Chapman LJ, Allen JJ. The measurement of foot preference. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(3): 579–584.
    1. Elias LJ, Bryden MP, Bulman-Fleming MB. Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36(1): 37–43.
    1. Hart S, Gabbard C. Examining the mobilizing feature of footedness. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;86(3 Pt 2): 1339–1342.
    1. Hart S, Gabbard C. Examining the stabilising characteristics of footedness. Laterality. 1997;2(1): 17–26. doi:
    1. Hardyck C, Petrinovich LF. Left-handedness. Psychol Bull. 1977;84(3): 385–404.
    1. Schneiders AG, Sullivan SJ, O’Malley KJ, Clarke SV, Knappstein SA, Taylor LJ. A valid and reliable clinical determination of footedness. PMR. 2010;2(9): 835–841.
    1. Ebersbach G, Dimitrijevic MR, Poewe W. Concurrent tasks on gait: a dual-task approach. Percept Mot Skills. 1995;81(1): 107–113. doi:
    1. Beling J, Wolfe GA, Allen KA, Boyle JM. Lower extremity preference during gross and fine motor skills performed in sitting and standing postures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(6): 400–404. doi:
    1. Kalaycıoğlu C, Kara C, Atbaşoğlu C. Aspects of foot preference: differential relationships of skilled and unskilled foot movements with motor asymmetry. Laterality. 2008;13(2): 124–142. doi:
    1. Bacelar AM, Teixeira LA. Footedness across ages: distinction between mobilization and stabilization tasks. Laterality. 2015;20(2): 141–153. doi:
    1. Grouios G, Hatzitaki V, Kollias N, Koidou I. Investigating the stabilising and mobilising features of footedness. Laterality. 2009;14(4): 362–380. doi:
    1. Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomeé P, Silbernagel K, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, et al. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;14(8): 778–788.
    1. Engelen-van Melick N, Van Cingel REH, Van Tienen TG, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Functional performance 2–9 years after ACL reconstruction: Cross-sectional comparison between athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone, semitendinosus/gracilis and healthy controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5): 1412–1423. doi:
    1. Laudani L, Giombini A, Mariani PP, Pigozzi F, Macaluso A. Application of the sit-to-stand test movement for the early assessment of functional deficits in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(3): 189–199. doi:
    1. Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J. Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(6): 571–580. doi:
    1. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(255): 204–214.
    1. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, et al. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(11): 1798–1805. doi:
    1. Thomeé R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, et al. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6): 1143–1151. doi:
    1. Teixeira LA, de Oliveira DL, Romano RG, Correa SC. Leg preference and interlateral asymmetry of balance stability in soccer players. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(1): 21–27. doi:
    1. Gstöttner M, Neher A, Scholtz A, Millonig M, Lembert S, Raschner C. Balance ability and muscle response of the preferred and nonpreferred leg in soccer players. Motor Control. 2009;13(2): 218–231.
    1. Trzaskoma Z, Ilnicka L, Wiszomirska I, Wit A, Wychowański M. Laterality versus jumping performance in men and women. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(1): 103–110.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir